Many countries like India,Pakistan,USA,France,Russia and many others have got the technology.
Are they something special?
People say thet USA are very civilized nation so they can have such technology.But do you think a warrior nation like USA which invaded many countries like Iraq,Afghanistan,Vietnam etc is a civilized nation.
As far as I think war is the most uncivilized way to get something.
And are Pakistanis more civilized than Iranians?
Israel says that Iran with nuclear technology is a great danger for them.Then is India with this technology not dangerous for Pakistan?
And USA is continuosly supporting its nuclear technology.Should not they both be unarmed from nuclear weapons?
2006-07-28
05:04:51
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Zaire
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Didn't USA actualy used it?
Tell me Japanese.....
2006-07-28
05:09:34 ·
update #1
Who declared America as WORLD POLICE.We don't want such a police.
2006-07-28
05:11:13 ·
update #2
For Uncleneal,India and Pakistan also threat each other that they will wipe each other out.
You don't know the situation in South Asia.
2006-07-28
05:13:14 ·
update #3
For Faco,if you don't wanna give weapon to a mad guy then why USA posseses nuclear weapon?
2006-07-28
05:15:04 ·
update #4
For snakeman,India always says that it will destroy Pakistan any time.
Same about Pakistan.
2006-07-28
05:17:17 ·
update #5
You a**hole if you take a look at India's history you will come to know India never went for a war, never tried to capture any foreign land but has always worked for peace. Pakistan, on the other hand, has always tried to attack India, tried to capture their land with the help of so called Jehadi groups or in simple English MOTHER FU**ING TERRORISTS. Pakistan has always been a pain in the a** for others and they are the black sheep of Asia. There is no difference between Iran and Pakistan cuz they both encourage terrorism and making Iran another nuclear power is as good as starting the 3rd world war.
2006-07-28 05:35:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by maxvijay2003 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the USA was trying to take over the world don't you think we've had a plethora of chances. If all we are is invasive and warrior-like how do you explain the fact that that every country we've been at war with was allowed their own government. We don't want none of your piece of sh!t countries. We'll take the oil but you can have the rest. What other country would leave all these places we've invaded. Invasion is obviously a key part of the beginning of a war, you would be retarded to go to war without warriors.
And though our military also f*cks up at least they are the exception to the rule and not brainwashed, starving, nut sacks who are just following orders.
Right now is a bad time to talk **** about us but if you approach the question honestly and if you seem to have researched and have been informed, you'll get honest answers.
Every country has it's flaws.
2006-07-28 12:25:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by crazygreeniis 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So if your friends jumped off a cliff to their death, would you?
If your freind put a loaded gun to his head and shot himself, would you?
Atomic bombs are antiques! They have been replaced with newer tech that is NOT radioactive.
If Iran wants Nuclear power as they claim! Then why not build the cheaper Nuclear power plant that doesn't allow Atomic bombs to made from their use.
The US invented the atomic bomb NOT Iran. Iran has NO rights to use OUR tech.
I know Arabs want to say we bombed Japan and we're bad! The truth is Japan exploded their Atomic bomb 3 days after Hiroshima. If the US hadn't bombed Japan first, Japan would have bombed the US. We just had no other option, seeing as Japan sneek attacked Pearl Harbor, before declaring war!
Iranian leaders have stated on TV that they would Atomic bomb the US. The US has never even threatened Iran with Atomic weapons. If Iran becomes too big of an a$$ we can blow the entire country clean off the map from 60,000ft any time we wish.
We can blow away entire nations, without Nuclear weapons, we have MOABs. 22,000lb conventional smart bombs with nuke blast power but NO radiation.
M…..Mother
O…..of
A…..all
B…..bombs
WE have Tomahawks with fuel-air explosive war heads. The big Tomahawks can carry 10 war heads. They can burn entire cities with fuel-air explosive.
First the MOAB, when the shock wave clears, in comes the Tomahawk. The entire city is flattened and then burned with fuel-air explosive. The fuel-air explosive burns everything left and it burns off all the oxygen. There is no way to survive!
With our satellites we can target every Arab city in any terrorist nation, and then lock them all into a firing solution. Then at 3am any morning the order was given, every Arab city targeted could be blown clean off the face of the Earth, all at the same time.
We could land troops 30 minutes later and own the nation, there would be no one to shoot at our soldiers. This would not be a good thing! Give your friends a heads up! Tell them this, maybe you can save them from becoming " Dust in the Wind"!
2006-07-28 12:28:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boy, a lot of lame answers. Parochial at best. Indeed, why shouldn't Iran have nuclear technology? A Iran with a peaceful nuclear energy program is better than a Iran boycotted by what seems like a hostile world. Mad men? Better look at North Korea.
2006-07-28 12:18:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ElOsoBravo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you ever heard the Iranian government officials speak? They want to destroy Israel (last time I checked they are our ally, whether you agree or not). They are also crazy. This is a country that executed a handicap girl because she was raped. Yeah BECAUSE SHE WAS RAPED. Would you want these people having nuclear capability. Oh yeah if the U.S.A. is such a terrible warrior nation and you are such a peace loving individual, then why don't you move to Iran. It seems like you like them more.
2006-07-28 12:13:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by chkibo2000 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
because if Iran had that technology then right now so would Hezbollah and Hamas.
Pakistan isnt going to use it
Neither is india or the united states
And neither is Israel
Noone is that stupid to set them off
Not even North Korea
But Iran would
You can bet on that
Theyve already said they would
2006-07-28 12:14:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by snakeman11426 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You dumb crackpot. To equate the moral equivalence of Iran fascist leaders to leaders of the USA, Russia, England, France, etc., you are one dumb idiot.
Your reasoning is a sign of a brain malfunction, seek help immediately.
2006-07-28 12:07:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran would have no problem using the nukes. If any of the people of the Muslim faith was to be killed by their nukes they would be martyrs for their faith. If you are not an Iranian or of any other Muslim faith I suggest you start doing a little research.
2006-07-28 12:10:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran has publically stated that the US and Israel should be wiped out of existence...
so, do you think they should have nukes? Wake up!
Fight Islamic fascism!
Liberty Over Liberalism!
2006-07-28 12:09:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Iran would actually use them.
We used nukes before there were laws in place. Now the only time the U.S. would use a nuke is in retaliation of a nuke launched at us.
2006-07-28 12:07:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jake 2
·
0⤊
0⤋