English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The first thing that needs pointed out is that women love sex; if they didn't then there wouldn't be billions of people conceived through sex. Now that may sound obvious but there was a period in the 1990s when feminists ruled even more than they do now and back then they asserted that, 'all sex is rape'. Now, a, the feminists/male-haters are talking rubbish and, b, we all know they're talking rubbish, now; but in the 90s people believed what they had to say. It's unthinkable to us now, but it used to be believed.

Secondly, the whole issue of 'rape' needs put in context, it's an out dated notion; I mean, the concept that a woman's genitals are special is a joke--- huge numbers of women in the west are prostituting themselves to our governments. And let's just focus on the idea of something being put in our bodies without our consent, it means nothing. If a woman put her finger in our mouths then we wouldn't cry rape. And every one of us have had our wives stick her finger in our mouths, just to annoy us. To suggest that it's somehow different when it's a woman's body is discrimination and needs to be treated as such. Also the people who commit such discrimination need to be prosecuted. The days of discriminaton and male-hatred/misandry are over.
On the other hand if we want rape to be an issue because it's a Biblical concept then ok but many other things come with that. If we're going to have Biblical penalties for men then we would need Biblical penalties for women who falsely cry rape. Of whom there are vast numbers it has to be remembered. The penalty is to be equal to the penalty that the man would have got, had he been guilty*. For a list of what this would mean to her see below**.

And what about the so called 'rape' of innocents.
If a woman has sex with a minor, which is rape in law, then why don't women get punished as often?

This is all just discrimination and we need to call it such. Thankfully we're all aware of discrimination now and this let's us all see that women really have had a cosy deal. With virtually everything biased in their favour.

Now some may say that one isn't traumatized when one's wife sticks her finger in one's mouth. Well first I refute that and second the law doesn't say anything about the woman's need to be traumatized. It just says that you have to be having sex after she has decided that she doesn't want you in that location. One micro-second after she has decided.
The law says that you have to prove that she gave her consent. Now how are you going to do that?!! The law needs to be laughed at here and derided. So just think about it, you will have to hand your woman a form and get her signature each time that you sleep with her, and come to think of it then you would need to get her to sign it anew every second just to make sure that she's not changed her mind.
This is the way the government treats every man who tries to help his country. Next time that there's a war on they will want us to fight for them too. And they'll want to shoot us for being frightened too- just as they did in the first, 'world war'. Think about that--- being abused whilst women get to sit by nice warm fires- as allways, traditionally, happened.
I want to point out that I was crying as my wife stuck her finger in my mouth so if that's not trauma then what is? I felt emotionally unable to deal with all of the stuff that she was doing to me, and there was more you can be sure. So I just tried to switch off. If we take physical force out of the equation then my wife is stronger than me, and when she has destroyed my ability to think rationally then my body doesn't have a mind making it do anything, and so physical strength isn't in the equation. Rather it's a question of mental strength, and we already know that it's men who are Learned Helpless, and men who are paralysed by their wife's emotional abuse. Going on a tangent from that, if the point is that trauma makes a rape valid then what about the trauma that men feel as their wives are leaving or abusing them, this must also be 'rape'. We don't call it such because we're brainwashed to be sexist against men. Now brainwashing from mom is a wonderfull thing and it has kept us safe but here it's just gone way too far.
Now a fact is also that it's men who are emotionally disabled and who are not even able to get to the authorities and report what's happening to them, so we really don't need any more excuses for violent women. Rather we need a check put on these women so that men will become freed to report the abuse that they suffer.

*Deut 19:18

**She is, to be locked up in a cell for years, to have her food spat in daily, to be banged up 23 hours a day, to have her family ripped apart, to have her livelihood taken from her, and if she has actually managed to withstand all of this treatment and come out of it in one piece, then, to be brutally beaten when seen outdoors and left brain-damaged, to be driven from her home and friends, to be spat on, to never have any prospects... One could spend forever talking about the things which happen to a man when he's a victim of false allegations. Well if you want the Biblical form of things then this, all, must be done to the woman.

Funnily enough the 'anti rape brigade' don't want the Biblical form of things. That's fine, then the only thing left to do is to treat men and women equal. This means 'rape' being no more of a 'crime' than a woman putting her finger in a man's mouth. We must stop supporting the old discrimination. Period. Those who commit it must be put in prison. Period.

2006-07-28 03:53:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Other - Family & Relationships

12 answers

too much to read,try to shorten it a little

2006-07-28 04:00:44 · answer #1 · answered by osageavenger 4 · 4 4

are you serious? First off rape is done to both women and men. I can't believe that you are trying to compare physical rape with sticking a finger in your mouth. Yeah you may be physically abused by your wife but that is not rape.
And about the war?? what the hell...you are out of your mind to say that women are at home sitting by a fire. If you haven't been up with the news/ the world.....women are fighting and dying in these wars. I think you should go and talk to a counselor..cause something is wrong with your head....and it seems like you have a lot of pain from your wife..you should talk to a professional.

2006-07-28 04:08:50 · answer #2 · answered by angela c 1 · 7 0

I didn't bother to read to the bottom of your epic tirade, but here's MY opinion on rape: NO means NO. If a woman does NOT want to have sex, then it should mean she should have the right to not be forced to participate in such an act. It should not matter if it is a first date, a complete stranger, a family member, or even your own spouse. Rape is (according to Webster's Collegiate Dictionary): TO FORCE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. There is NO consent in that statement whatsoever.

Rape is a VERY violent psychological attack - it just happens to occur upon a person's body; more rape victims are women then men, because women are perceived as being weak and helpless - and sometimes they are (like the 8 year old girl f*cked by her own uncle while he held her head under water in her own bathtub and drowned .... SHE wanted it, right ******?!) There are even historical accounts of women and girls being raped to DEATH. Yeah, THAT was a fun time for those whores ... they DESERVED THAT, didn't they?

Let's just turn the tables for a second - how would you like it if you were strapped down to a table or hog-tied or whatever and something was forcibly shoved into your anus? It would hurt REALLY badly, you would feel exceptionally violated, and you'd be wondering what the hell you did to deserve it. Wouldn't you?
Or how about an entire group of people shoving things - fingers, beer bottles, broom sticks, dildos, penises, or what have you - up your butt... REPEATEDLY (that would be GANG RAPE). Men get raped ALL the time in prison...its a fact.

Rape is NOT a sexual thrill for women...it is a miserable experience.

2006-07-28 04:08:10 · answer #3 · answered by Brutally Honest 7 · 11 1

Rape is VERY relevant in this age. Rape destroys people. It makes them think less of themselves. It takes away years, even decades from their lives from the trauma it causes. It destroys families. It is the most prevalent violent crime commited in the U.S. Your comparison is horrible too. If a man allows a woman to put her finger in his mouth and she does, then it is completely consentual and there is no exchange of power or effect on the people mental state or opinion of themselves. Rape is never consentual. With rape under most people definition, a person uses another as nothing more than a sex object. They take away that person's control of their own body. The victim comes out of that experience thinking less of themselves for a multitude of reasons. Rape is a serious and relevant issue.

2006-07-28 04:13:57 · answer #4 · answered by carora13 6 · 5 0

One wrong does not negate another. Just because one woman may falsely claim to be raped doesn't justify another woman being raped. Women may "love sex", but they love it on their own terms and with the person of their choosing. Feminists took a stand in saying that they were not just sex objects. Their sole existence did not derive from a sexually submissive role. Think about women's roles in society up through the 20th century--wife and mother. Many women still choose to be in relationships with men and have children. But it is their choice. Women hurt men, and men hurt women. Such is human nature. But when we continue to ignore or attempt to explain away atrocities such as rape, murder, etc. we are de-valuing humans and their place
in the world.

The culture of the Bible doesn't begin to justify your argument. Your wife putting her finger in your mouth is any annoyance. Rape is a crime. You can make your wife stop. A rape victim will suffer physically and emotionally. I hope you don't show this to your wife. If you were my husband.....you make me sick.

2006-07-28 04:20:28 · answer #5 · answered by Left-Handed Lady 2 · 9 0

i could say no, i'm no longer a feminist. i'm an equalist. it form of feels the feminist flow began with wanting equivalent rights for women folk yet has perverted right into a guy hating tirade purely attracted to women folk getting each and all the pros and not one of the cons.

2016-10-08 10:20:12 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Couldn't be bothered reading all that spurious CRAP!!! As soon as someone quotes the bible I see red!!!

Rape is very relevant, numbnuts!!! If you violate someone, ANYONE, without their consent, you are liable, by law to be prosecuted and put on a sex offenders register!!!

So, stop talking out of your back hole and crawl back under your rock!!!!

2006-07-28 03:58:40 · answer #7 · answered by Forlorn Hope 7 · 8 1

It is so relevant that it make inmediate breking news in cnn.

2006-07-28 03:56:57 · answer #8 · answered by Carlos 3 · 3 1

You can write a book on it but rape is rape, stupid!

2006-07-28 03:57:34 · answer #9 · answered by moonsister_98 6 · 4 1

allot of workds, but where's the question

2006-07-28 03:56:53 · answer #10 · answered by timestamps 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers