2006-07-28 03:12:25 · 15 answers · asked by DARKORD 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
bush wants to control the middle east as the west is dependant on the oil from the worlds largest reserves. blair is dragging us into a dirty little war against Lebanon to further the US hold and its possible striking of Iran. We are all in the crapper with this which may escalate into a world war. The US is a fundamentalist society and bush is playing to these christian crackpots who believe armageddon is just around the corner - he will have no problem in engaging a war that fulfills his country's deepest beliefs. Fannybaws.
2006-07-28 03:22:33 · answer #1 · answered by Allasse 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Of course they should.All the the foreign interference of USA and Britain during the last 30 years has been a disaster..Backing the Shah in Iran,then withdrawing their support.Backing Saddam Hussein,then supporting his foes in overthrowing him.Supporting all the autocratic rulers in other Gulf states against the wishes of the democratic majority.Unreserved support of Israel in their land grabbing and genocidal practices.A few years ago,both countries were giving military aid to the Taliban backed Mujahedeen to fight against their own government and the Russians.Now they bomb the cr*p out of them at every opportunity.Both countries also have a longer track record of ruinous foreign policy.The Treaty of Versaile,Suez and Indian partition for example.Will these idiots never learn.
2006-07-28 03:32:12 · answer #2 · answered by morasice17 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Morasice 17 well put I agree 100%.America has caused untold grief to many citizens of the world and as far as i can recall they have never won a war on their own!
2006-07-28 20:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by braw 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not with the global economies so interconnected.
If countrys want our help
or
if they are doomed to be overthrown by rebels, guerrillas, or some anti-governmental, non-democratic, oppressive faction
then as the most powerful nation on Earth...i think it's our responsibility to help.
2006-07-28 03:23:58 · answer #4 · answered by Warrior 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, why bush and Blair is killing people in other countries?? they play many diplomatics roll and that makes people fighting each other! if bush was not in this earth, people could live better!!!
2006-07-28 03:31:13 · answer #5 · answered by love 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have, but won't, they've benn dancing the Texas Two Step since before 9/11. I think the Brits may get damn tired of the dance, though.
2006-07-28 05:09:48 · answer #6 · answered by friscolady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel that we should only get inmvolved when it is in our best interests or if lookes like someone is working their way to controlling the world.
Remember we were dragged into WWI an II, it was not of our own free will.
2006-07-28 03:41:53 · answer #7 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, if it doesn't affect our own affairs. But just about every conflict has long-term effects, and we should at the very least pay attention to what's going on.
2006-07-28 03:20:18 · answer #8 · answered by ccrider 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should have Roosevelt and Churchhill stayed out of WWII?
2006-07-28 03:32:49 · answer #9 · answered by Mags 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People look to the large nations for help, and we feel it is our responsibility to try and help. What? Does it piss off all you terrorist that you can't rape, murder, pillage, and dictate to the world your stupid views?
2006-07-28 03:21:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋