WHY is america scared to use nukes in the middle east .?

Question

ARE we cowards like the enemy says.IF they had them they would use them .SO i say it is because we must be cowards.30,000,000 peole have died needlessly around the world for no reason if we can not use nukes to end the middle east conflict .the billions we spent to make the world a better place wasted . we could of done so much more for the world had we not wasted it building weapons for show .I have the same problem with people who have airconditioned garages to keep thier cars in while people die in heat waves for lack of a fan .
WE are all show and no go and the terrorists are right . america is an amoral society weak minded and powerless against allah .
I am tiered of being the laughing stock of the world .WHAT can america do if we bomb the world trade center and pentegon send us some soldiers to kill what fun .WE need to get off our buts and do something nuke them and quit playing around.
ITS like watching akid torture a cat and we are an ant biteing at his anckle distacting him .

Answer 1

u said that 30,000,000 people have died needlessly around the world... don't u ever think that using nukes on the middle east will just increase that number? nukes aren't like some ordinary weapon that u can set to hunt down and kill only the people u desire. they devastate and kill all living things within a radius of miles.

and why is america so scared to use nukes in the middle east? not the whole world agrees with america's action of invading the middle east. there are people in this world who would rather side with the middle east than with america. and these people are not few in number. what do u think would happen if america goes ahead and use the nukes? are u really that foolish to believe that america is invincible? can u imagine the reaction of the rest of the world if a nuclear is used, not just in the middle east, but anywhere in the world? retaliation is sure under way, and mind u, america is not the only country who owns nukes.

i know that america has let millions or even billions of dollars go down the drain to build nukes and other weapons, but that doesn't mean that america has to use it. come on, using a weapon that has such a massive destructive power 'just because'?

america has everything to lose; it's economy, infrastructures, walmarts and what-have-u. compared to the middle east? they're already war-torn, some of their infrastructures are already destroyed, some of the people are already living in poverty. they have very little to lose as compared to america.

the bottom line is, please ask urself this question: are u really concerned about ending this whole war thing or are u just itching to prove ur country?

Answer 2

You are truly such an idiot, ignorant and misinformed. Think before you open your smelly mouth. We, as the USA of America are controlling the Middle East and the whole world. We can do anything we want. We are so powerful that we can solve any problem and create any problem also. It is not for our interest to solve the conflict in the Middle East. We do not want to solve it and we want it to stay complicated. In this case, our Foreign Policy would mean something. It is all about the "Survival of the Fittest". I do care about innocent people being slaughtered every day, however, killing innocents is part of our politics and Foreign Policy. Life goes on anyway. It is a shame!

Answer 3

You know something, you are so wrong. While we may be viewed as uncivilized and greedy, we are basically kind, loving, hopeful people who want peace. If we want the world to end, we can drop some bombs in the blink of an eye. North Korea, Iran and Venezuela have mad men as leaders and overtly express their hate for our way of life. I think there are some sneaky countries left over from the Soviet Union or other countries that have Soviet weapons that are just waiting for an opportunity to use those weapons on us. Just because you are the biggest kid on the block, you don't go knocking other kids down just because you can.

Answer 4

You apparently don't be responsive to why we invaded Iraq the two with the aid of fact you're connecting it with 9/11, some thing the Bush administration by no ability did. Operation Opera (the Isreali attack on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor) handed off on June 7, 1981 BTW. Operation barren region shelter exchange right into a reaction to Iraq's attempt to annex the self sufficient u . s . of Kuwait with the aid of rigidity of arms in August 1990. Saddam Hussein ordered assaults on Israel in an attempt to get Israel to shoot lower back and for that reason ruin up the Coalition that have been assembled to enforce the U.N. resolutions for Iraq to go away Kuwait. yet howdy, thank you for demonstrating in basic terms how little you be responsive to.

Answer 5

WOW... thats the solution to everything isnt it? Just fu*king nuke every problem you have...but sadly its not the solution... nukes produce extreme amount of radiation that can be released into the atmosphere and can travel around the world affecting hundreds of millions... not to mention the thousands of innocent people that would die from radiation poisoning in the area... and were not the only one with nukes... if we use them whats going to stop other countries from using them?... you cant end violence anywhere with more violence and destruction... you should be asking why were there in the first place... if we werent there then there would be no conflict in the first place

Answer 6

Sorry to say but you must be out of your mind to expect America to use nuclear bombs to contain the chaotic situation in the Middle East and elsewhere created by its own ill-advised policies! Should for instance nuclear bombs are dropped in Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Palestine, basically it will lead to destruction of resources - human and others. But do you think America can continue to exist in such a scenario? Maybe America will have gone under the Pacific and Atlantic oceans by the time USA completes is nuclear-bomb-dropping mission in the Middle East as you suggest!

Answer 7

It's because we don't want it to be like another World War I, and we also don't want things to turn out like Vietnam was. Ever since Vietnam happened we have been more hesitant to enter wars because we are afraid of losing that many people once again.

But also, I think we aren't going to "nuke them" because it's going to cost innocent peoples lives. And it will just be an endless cycle of fighting going back and forth. And by nuking them, then they'll nuke us.. and we'll lose our lives for something that isn't really necessary at the moment.

We're not cowards, we're just actually using our brains for once.

Answer 8

The the reason is that, we can bomb the world to pieces but we can't bomb to peace. What you are feeling right now is what psychologist call "fake-rage". So, calm down, take a breath because I know your better than that comment you just posted brother. Americans have always been masters at communicating, it's time we regain our footing in this respect and lead by example...not by death.

Answer 9

because when we used the bomb, we didnt actually know how bad it would be. if we use it again, we are going to kill EVERYONE and the amount of radiation will destroy the land and future generations for a while. besides, its against the united nations, so if we do it, then every country will be against us, and many of those countries have bombs.

and our president is dumb and he'll just use them all at once and completely devistate that side of the globe with a push of a button.

Answer 10

If we use nukes then the whole world will turn against us. Trust me my friend it is better for the US to use urban warfare than to nuke. The US would kill thousands of innocent civilans thus the word will see us as a big bully.

Besides are military domiantes when it comes to urban warfare.