why are there men that call themselves christian have all of these lld dr things that are sameto the pharisees

Question

denomonation or without denomonation, every individual group have no understanding in the word and do what the world does. wear make up, pierce their bodies, women wearing pants when the word says that women should not wear clothing that is similar to mans. then, they call them selves christian. the denomonated christians are blinded and they only care about there creeds and TBN networks. what sin, what a shame. thats going round the world but its kiling the souls in their denomonation. their denomonation is like the pharisees. they dont teach no word, they teach make believe, unbelief. there are some christians who say that there is a trinity but the word says nothing like that and they believe there is a three spririts in one god. why? there is no such thing because if there was it would say, but in revelation 16 shows you bout three unclean spirits like frogs going out into the world out of thje dragon, beast, and false prohpet working miracles. a true christian knows more.

Answer 1

I responded to your other identical post.

Regarding the Trinity, admittedly, that word is not in the Bible. But then again, neither is "Bible" either, yet you continue to call the concept of 66 books joined together describing the lives of the Hebrews and of Jesus Christ, "Bible". The Trinity is not literally "3 spirits in one God", but rather "3 beings who are a single God". It is akin to "egg" being made of "shell, yolk, and white". It is akin to "me" being "Mom (to my kids), Seraphim (my creative self as gamer, game designer, and artist), and [insert real name here ^_~] (as my physical existance)". It is akin to "family" being "mom, dad, and child". They are all seperate from one another, yet, comprise a single existance.

If I may ask, who was there at Jesus' baptism? God spoke, Jesus was baptised, and the Holy Spirit decended. All three were present, within a single scene. Who raised Jesus? Acts 5:30 - God did. John 2:19 - Jesus did. 1 Peter 3:18 - Holy Spirit did. All three did, but each treated as a single act, not as three working together. In Genesis 1:26, "Let US make man in OUR image"? Who is Us and Our? Man does not bear 4 faces or wings, eliminating the possibility of God speaking to angels. "Elohim" is plural, a composite unity. If God was truly a single being, the proper Hebrew word would have been "Eloha", yet, "Elohim" was chosen to represent God's Triune nature.

"My Lord and My God" - John 20:28. No obediant Jew would use the words "Lord" and "God" as a blasphemous epithet, and Thomas was not praying, but proclaiming his belief to Jesus.

"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace." - Isa 9:6
"The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto the mighty God." - Isa 10:21
"I and my Father are one." - John 10:30

Jesus is the Child spoken about, and He is called "The Mighty God, The Everlasting Father". Both God and Jesus are called "the mighty God". Both God and Jesus are called "Father". How could this not be so, unless they are "one", in the way that a man and woman, upon being joined in marriage and intimacy, are no longer as two, but as one soul (Gen 2:24). Two seperates, but equal in status, position, and existance.

Just as beast begets beast, equal in status and existance to their parents, and just as mankind begets, not a lesser beast, but rather mankind, hence God must beget, not a lesser man, but rather God. Angels neither beget, nor are begotten, since they do not marry nor are given in marriage. Since the Son of God was born in a man's body, He has both the full qualities of man and of God. Otherwise, if Jesus is not God, if he would have had a child, it would have been beast, and that grandchild would be insect, and that great grandchild would have been plant, if God did not beget an equal, but rather a lesser being.

And above all, John 1:1 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God". It doesn't get any plainer than that.

"Show us the Father". "Have you been with Me so long that you don't see Him? If you know me, you know the Father".

If you know Seraphim, you know the person who is behind the avatar, for we are one. One you see the pic of, and read the words of, the other, you cannot, yet you know of her existance. Yet, we are one and the same, but seperated by the available senses given by the 'net.

Answer 2

It is up to the individual christian, each is responsible for himself and his family, or herself and her family. If a christian fails to read his Bible and depends solely on another's interpretation of the Word, he will not receive all he needs. There is nothing wrong with women wearing pants, as long as they look feminine. After all, in many cultures, males wear what we would consider dresses. It matters more that the female look female and the male look male, so there is no question as to the person's gender. I, too, think that the tv evangalists are only out for money, what they do is no different than an infomercial. I think the belief in the Trinity comes from God sending Jesus, and Jesus giving us a Comforter (the Holy Spirit) in his absence. The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Answer 3

If christianity is the nicely suited faith, then i think of that each and each denomination has it bit incorrect and somewhat suitable. no person faith or denomination interior is right or extra effectual than the different. i'm neither atheist nor non secular. i'm usually humanist, yet i do no longer low fee the possibility that there is gods or despite. yet I place self assurance in people extra suitable than any prayer i could make. "i'm a god unto myself, i'm going to come to a determination what it maximum suitable for myself" form of element. one element I definitely have observed exchange into that maximum christians view mormonism as a cult. **further** As defined to me with the aid of a mormon buddy in the previous, all and sundry can hear the voice of their god, yet purely the Prophet (Hinkley) is in a position to do something approximately it for church doctrine. they suspect the Pope is a pretend prophet, if I keep in mind properly. one among those pissed me off, with the aid of fact its like the pot calling the kettle black. Prophet and Pope are the comparable element, in basic terms 2 distinctive people in 2 distinctive denominations asserting the top comparable element approximately one yet another.

Answer 4

I'm guessing there's nothing in your Bible about proper spelling and grammar.