Al Queda's Second in Command redefines Jihad against the US. What do you think ???

Question

Shiites (Hezbollah) and Sunni (Al Queda) are enemies.
Now they are called to be allianced against the US and Israel.
Not only that... He asked all muslims and all "the oppressed and downtrodden" throughout the world to join their Jihad.

Making it very clear that their Terrorism will be starting in the US soon...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060727/wl_afp/mideastconflictqaeda_060727162312

Answer 1

I think that he is a desperate old fool who is losing his popularity. He and his boss have to re-surface every now and then, just to let their followers know they are still kickin. Lately, in the world of Islamic terrorism, the longevity rate has been seriously challenged.

If you want to see a blood bath, just watch how the American civilian population reacts if Muslims in the US, step out of line.

Answer 2

So 9/11 wasnt terrorism in the US?

its propaganda. These arent new words. I wasnt hearing the love between the Shiites and Sunni... Al Queda thinks Shiites are infidels.

Answer 3

form-of, variety of. the unique actors in the civil conflict were the authorities well known Syrians vs something of the Syrians. even if, because the authorities well known ones were a spread of Shi'ite Islam and something were Sunni Islam, it grew to develop right into a religious civil conflict. Radical Islam communities which includes al Quaeda (which also rails adversarial to Shi'ites) then were given in contact. the U. S. has supported the unique secular freedom circulation from the initiating and helped the Arab League deliver them guns (Iran backs Syria it really is the accepted enemy of the Arabs) even if it has develop into murky who's what. I see no way for the U. S. to reveal out the seculars from the radicals so guns receives into the incorrect palms (it really is the administration that employed an al-Quaeda military to guard the CIA the front operation in Benghazi that were given a US Consul killed, after all) . it really is the reason the U. S. has stayed commonly out of it yet our President has little skill to be President so made the stupid mistake of retaining "pink strains" for political motives so has to provide guns or completely lose credibility.

Answer 4

We could only be so lucky. Believe me I pray that an attack doesn't occur but it might be the only thing that will make liberals remove their heads from their rectums and understand that Terrorists don't give a damn which side of the fence you are on - you are on a evil infidel American fence and we all must be destroyed. Maybe then we would be like the Israelis who understand that their way of life is threatened by terrorist. That's why they have a 95% rating for support of the Lebanon war. Even LIBERAL Israeli es understand the danger of whacked out Terrorists!

Answer 5

It already has. It seems like Al Queda is reduced to making video tape of thier rantings and ravings these days. Al Queda is not the inventor of gutless and cowardly terrorist attacks but they have a place at the top of the list of shame.

Answer 6

Good morning! (Lobster was good thanks for advice)

If it stops all the secular violence in Iraq, it could actually do some good...I don't think it will though.

I am actually surprised we have not had smaller scale attacks since 9/11. We have to understand that it took from 2/26/93 (the first attacks on the WTC) to the next attack on 9/11.

Answer 7

Big deal. Do you think this makes a difference. All these groups will attack the west if they have a chance. Ganging up won't change things.

Answer 8

doesn't sound strange to me after what is going on in Lebanon

Answer 9

"the enemy of my enemy is my Friend" old saying they're learned