English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Um, no.... I don't think you understand the principles of evolution. The idea is not that all apes miraculously morphed into people overnight. The idea is that very small genetic mutations occur and are passed down that family line. If they are beneficial, then individual creatures with those mutations will gain an advantage and pass this advantage onto their offspring. Only those directly descended from the individual in which the mutation occurred will inherit it. Other mutations will occur in other lineages, hence the diversity of species otherwise closely related (humans, chimps and gorilla, for example).

2006-07-28 01:25:54 · answer #1 · answered by Entwined 5 · 2 0

> I dont belive interior the thought that our grand grand Ancestors have been monkeys? good, best for you. you may circulate decrease back some extra generations to get to the monkeys. Our final monkey ancestor exchange into approximately 25 million years in the past. > Then why Monkeys exist now a days they could be human beings. human beings are descended from Europeans, so why could Europeans nonetheless exist? this is because of the fact human beings do no longer stay interior the comparable places as Europeans. Edit: I see multiple otherwise knowledgeable human beings pulling the "person-friendly ancestor" nonsense, which clouds the subject. specific, we are actually not descended from as we communicate's monkeys; those adult men are cousin species fairly than ancestral. yet make no mistake, we are descended from previous international monkeys. An previous international monkey who's been lifeless three hundred and sixty 5 days is a dull monkey. An previous international monkey who's been lifeless 25 million years is likewise a dull monkey. i'm descended from filipinos even however my final filipino ancestor died interior the Nineteen Forties. There are nonetheless filipinos residing in yet another component to the international as we communicate. i'm no longer descended from them, yet i'm a "cousin."

2016-11-03 04:40:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This is a scientist theory, and something explored by Charles Darwin I think. Many are against this "Theory of Evolution" I'm not sure if I agree with it, but I don't mind listening to the evidence presented and the story behind the theory. I'm open to ideas, and I love to hear about this theory. I think those who are interested more research should be done, and those who are not feel free to walk away, those who aren't sure might be interested in hearing about it.

2006-07-28 01:17:54 · answer #3 · answered by JBWPLGCSE 5 · 0 0

Homo sapiens and the monkeys of today have the same roots, so why should the monkeys be abolished. That's like saying the horses and the zebras have the same root, so we better abolish the zebras.. Your question doesn't make sense?

2006-07-28 05:05:08 · answer #4 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

The theory claims that we descended from the same ancestor and we branched out and adapted to our own environments.

2006-07-28 01:16:17 · answer #5 · answered by GoateeBoy 3 · 0 0

Where did you pick up that tidbit of non-knowledge? Man did not descend from ape; man and ape descended from a common primate ancestor. I do believe that there are apes that can speak better English than you do.

2006-07-28 01:16:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Whatever is taught to us is not 100% accurate and true.
Unless the pure scientific experiments.

2006-07-28 01:24:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Youre sayong that were better than monkeys? You racist

2006-07-28 01:16:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no.they are too part of our ecology

2006-07-28 01:23:51 · answer #9 · answered by Mary D 1 · 0 0

? please explain what you mean

2006-07-28 01:15:02 · answer #10 · answered by rami #1 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers