This President has taken this nation to an illegal and unconstitutional war . President is not a king who does not have the power to take the nation to war without congress first authorizing it, first either declaring war or taking equivalent action. Congress never authorized this war, despite the myth of what congress did in October 2002 and the president never had the authority, therefore, to launch this first strike invasion against Iraq. Furthermore, beyond that trampling of the constitution, in taking this nation to illegal war, causing thousands of deaths, we now know that the president lied to the united states congress and to the American people about the reasons for taking a nation to war. Weapons of Mass Destruction, none of which have been found, alleged links to al- Qaeda, none of which have been proven true. This President and his senior advisers who took this nation into a serial war should be now be held accountable for these impeachment offenses. These are the highest of all crimes that could possibly be considered as an impeachable offense and the charge should be made. There is no immunity even in an election year to presidents being charged with impeachable offenses if they have committed them. This president should be charged with having taken this nation to illegal war and having violated the oath of office in the constitution and deserving impeachment.
2006-07-28 00:21:33 · 18 answers · asked by tough as hell 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes
2006-07-28 00:24:12 · answer #1 · answered by christin r 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If the president did anything to be impeached don't you think the democrats would have been all over it? For Christ sake, look at what Clinton did while in office with Monica, and we wanted to hang him by the balls. The sad thing is that most man who called him on it, are the same hypocrites that was cheating or has cheated on their wives.
The crimes you are charging bush of are worst then those of Clinton, yet bush was voted back into office. This is not time to cry about what has already happened if indeed he did do something wrong, this is the time to stick together because we might be heading into world war 3 because of those terrorist morons in the middle east.
Finally, I am sad for all the deaths in Iraq and those brave soldiers over there that are still dying as a matter of fact my brother in law just went back. But something had to be done, because terrorism is spreading all over the world, are you sleeping?
Did 911 open your eyes to what radical killing mongrels are capable of? Remember all those people that died, someone had to pay for it and it is not like Saddam was sending us his best wishes for all our lost. He was hiding those terrorist sons of a biatch and funding them. Lets not spend time here pointing fingers, let’s be grateful that those crazy, sick war mongrels have not been able to bomb us again.
Do you really realize what we are up against here, these people will strap bombs to their own wives and mothers and send them to die to prove a point. If not for the urgent and radical thinking of our good president we would not be able to take the trains to work today. He is doing something or believe me 911 would be 9/12, 9/13, 9/14, and so on. Hopefully our soldiers will come home so, and now what they need is our prayers and support. OK.
2006-07-28 01:02:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a little late to impeach now. Why isn't the country banning together to find someone who will actually care about legal Americans and work for the people? Democrats and Republicans are all a like. They get in office to get rich and don't care about the people they are supposed to serve. Why do you think you only hear about about the things they are doing when election is near? Why don't the people get out and vote in the primaries? When it gets down to the lesser of two crooks, it's to late. The middle class is being destroyed in this country.
2006-07-28 00:47:02 · answer #3 · answered by jackie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why does this question save getting requested? Impeachment is a mindset to criminal prosecution. President Bush has no longer commited a criminal offense -- hence there ought to correctly be no impeachment. I do not forget that you're adversarial to the conflict. maximum likey you've been poisoined with suggestions from the media. in aspect of incontrovertible reality that our president has taken us to a conflict that develop into already being waged adversarial to us previously we arrived on the conflict floor. we gained't enable radical Islam attack us on our own soil back. it is a conflict we are waging to guard our very way of existence
2016-11-26 20:28:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand your frustration but not your understanding of constitutional law. Can you draw up a legit case against Bush, worthy of impeachment? If so, maybe you should be kickin' it with high powered Democrats and not squandering your talents on Yahoo! Answers at 5 am.
Lemme guess...you took PoliSci 101 at State College
2006-07-28 00:27:03 · answer #5 · answered by The Oregon Kid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get over it...
Another election is coming... then you'll have 4 more years of whining and finding fault with the NEW guy we get in there.
You Dem's are SUCH bad sports. You'd rather our country FAIL then admit, that OUR GUY... is doing a great job.
And the sad part is... You color the situation Dark GRAY... then... you say SEE?
You guys are UNBELIEVABLE.
If KERRY EDWARDS were in there... Or AL GORE were in there... we'd be overran by terrorism right now.
2006-07-28 00:27:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Granted Bush's record is one of the worst ever, second only to Jackson who committed the American Indian genoside (his genoside was larger than Hitlar's). If we impeached Bush, Cheney would be worse. I believe that is the reason that it isn't being persued.
2006-07-28 01:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by vertical732 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can prove that Bush knowingly committed a criminal offense, then you can impeach him. Since there are smarter folks than you in Washington who have done nothing yet, then perhaps there is nothing that they are able to do.
2006-07-28 00:26:42 · answer #8 · answered by Chief BaggageSmasher 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You sound like the guy that yelled for help from a burning building and then sued the fireman for breaking your door in to get to you.
2006-07-28 00:35:08 · answer #9 · answered by DS143 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wish that you weren't right. you are very correct in what you are saying. he has treated this like a monarchy. he has used his personal beliefs in stead of what is best for the American people to "rule" over this country on top of all that you have said. (not that it is a legal reason, but it a good ethical reason.)
2006-07-28 00:26:27 · answer #10 · answered by singitoutloudandclear 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No . Not till he sticks his d__ in some poor little teenagers mouth like Clinton did.
2006-07-28 01:08:59 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋