2006-07-27 23:31:31 · 7 answers · asked by love_ocean125 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe that this government has a good system of checks and balances, designed to spread the power and protect any once branch from wielding too much of it. It can, however, be used indiscriminately at times, as can nearly all government powers.
No, I do not think it should be canceled.
2006-07-27 23:36:40 · answer #1 · answered by rrrevils 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, it is important to our system of checks an balances.
ON another note, the veto power in the UN for the Security Coucil. That should be cancelled. Nations like Russia and China often abuse this power.
2006-07-27 23:34:53 · answer #2 · answered by Jon H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Veto power NO
Line Item Veto power - maybe
I am assuming you are referring to the current debate over line item veto. Line item veto is a good idea because it gets rid of a lot of bologna(pork, not beef hehe) added to bills BUT when you have an ignorant idiot in office, it might be a bad idea.
Once again, the lack of trust in an adequate leader has thrown our entire system for a loop. I would have never guessed in 1000 years that I would not support line item veto because of an out of control president...
2006-07-27 23:38:49 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it should be left alone, it is part of the checks and balance in the system, there is even relief with a two thirds majority of congress it can be over thrown. It is a good system, embrace it, do not change the constitution.
2006-07-27 23:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the US has used way too many VETO's in the UN....sad really..just to get their own way.
2006-07-27 23:34:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
U.N.F.A.I.R......
I think it should definitely be cancelled!
2006-07-27 23:34:51 · answer #6 · answered by Natasha 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not
2006-07-28 00:43:16 · answer #7 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋