Existence demands explanation! Evolution posits that a Big Bang formed the universe as it is, but what caused the circumstances for the Big Bang, and the circumstances for those circumstances? If there is an infinite regress or an actual beginning, evolutionists are claiming ex nihilo, which is not something I think they would support. The existence of an infinite spiritual Cause would solve this problem. I.E. As far as I know, evolution claims that there are no self-existing objects, which is a problem because there needs to be a cause for the existence of the space-time continuum; only something not bound by natural laws (the supernatural) could cause the natural.
2006-07-27 23:31:03 · 8 answers · asked by David B 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
1st answer: you ignorant fool! Why disparage a position I am not advocating? Who said I am a creationist? Why don't you answer the real question (what is the scientific explanation for the source of our finite system) and not focus on a technicality?
3rd answer: The supernatural does not need to be bound by the laws of nature; it is a problem for nature to be self-existent because science says that there is no such thing, but it is not a problem for 'God' to be self-existent because He is super-natural (by definition not bound by natural laws like cause/effect).
2006-07-27 23:55:54 · update #1
5th answer: Is this the opinion of all evolutionists? That the universe (space-time) spontaneously occured?
2006-07-28 00:00:19 · update #2
Outside of spacetime I see no good reasons why a universe should not appear spontaneously. Okay, its wrong, its bad and its blasphemous, but I see no impossibility. The big bang is no more proveable than the existence of gods - science can't touch it because events in the first 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds were to hot to conform to the "laws" of physics - which fit the universe we know. I would suggest learning the story of evolution, even if it's not true, also learn about chaos theory and quantum physics, because between the tree of them they leave little if any need for the "supernatural".
2006-07-27 23:53:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The thing is that is not necessary to posit God who created universe.
Consider: Saying that God always existed is as satisfying of an answer as "Universe always existed" both have the infinite regress problem.
But the God is cut out by Occam's razor as an unnecessary entity.
2006-07-28 07:42:45 · answer #2 · answered by hq3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there are countless medical theories as to how the universe grew to become into created. i don't are responsive to all of it that properly, yet those theories do not instruct or disprove a god or different bigger skill triggering this or being in contact in some way. the comparable is going with evolution. Evolution basically explains what occurred as quickly as existence have been given started. all of us comprehend that the situations mandatory for existence on earth existed, yet how existence started can not be proved, and no scientist has ever been able to create existence from non-existence. Evolution is actuality and in case you like to talk it you're in simple terms an ignorant guy or woman. you're finding at issues from the incorrect perspective. You have been indoctrinated with a gaggle of comments and function been brought about have faith that what you have been taught is the only threat and that if the finished subject is in simple terms ordinary incorrect then there is not any purpose to existence by any ability. extremely of in keeping with a gaggle of mythology, you may desire to easily understand that we do not likely comprehend the respond. no person knows how the universe grew to become into created, how they have been given right here, what's there (if something) after death, or what the destiny holds. The earth will now not exist in some billion years, and who knows how lots longer humanity as all of us comprehend it is going to final. All you're able to do is to attempt to be a stable guy or woman, be happy which you're right here, attempt to stay a stable existence and be happy, and attempt to make this international a greater effective place. in case you get happiness and delight out of your religious ideals, it quite is large. yet once you're going approximately attempting to persuade those that your faith is nice and everybody else's ideals are incorrect, all you're doing is hastening the tip of humanity.
2016-12-10 16:15:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yet again the creationists demonstrate their complete lack of understanding of the thing they criticise. The big bang has nothing to do with evolution.
One day they will make an attempt to understand the theory. Until then, their criticisms are laughable.
2006-07-27 23:37:58 · answer #4 · answered by iansand 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the big bang is the event for the physical and energy universe if you can imagine the pressure of all the matter in the universe collected on a pin head .... then B A N G
2006-07-27 23:51:21 · answer #5 · answered by q6656303 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So, if God created the Universe, who created God?
Why is a self-creating God more plausible than a self-creating Universe?
2006-07-27 23:48:55 · answer #6 · answered by Sean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
call it the spegetti monster in the sky if you want ,but we were created, we all know it, but dening this is for those who dont want to be beholding to a greater power
2006-07-27 23:40:54 · answer #7 · answered by thankuberry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
'..........the end is the beginning is the end."
...Al -Quran.
2006-07-28 04:36:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋