Yes! Going to war on a lie! For which countless lives have been lost
2006-07-27 22:46:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes i agree. Going for a war with another country is not a proper diplomacy .Moreover they could have caught Saddam by using intelligence rather than ruining Innocent peoples day to day life. but unfortunately these two made tension among everybody in the world. We never had this much of tension when bill Clinton was on power. We never heard any bloody war. The world economy was stable. every one travelled and did business.
I think bush and Blair should step down and give the seat to some one else who can think about human values
The name of peace! implementing a war is not a best solution and it never been.
2006-07-27 23:33:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by man123470 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Morons, your all bloody morons, Ok Blair and Bush are idiots, but the war in Iraq was justified, Sadam needed to be braught to justice, there are always casualties of war, Sadam was killing his own people innocent people at that! Untill tyrants are brought to justice there will be wars, there will be casualties, but years down the line these states will be led by honourable leaders who dont kill there innocent. should blair and bush face a tribuneral, what a ridiculous question, remember these are the men that are protecting your country from suicide bombers and so called martyrs, remember that next time people are blowing trains up in London or Crashing planes into buildings in the US. The British and Americans are fighting for a united world, for a peacefull world and yes the only way to do this sometimes is to go to war, you see the Brits and Yanks tried to talk to Sadam on atleast 10 occassions and he was given several deadlines but he ignored all of them, he was duely warned of the consiquences, im actually suprised people can be so blind, the news tells stories about young Iraqi men and women who get killed but some of them would gladdy blow themselves up killing you son, daughter, mother, father, or baby and not even bat an eye-lid, thats what bush and blair are trying to stop.
2006-07-27 22:46:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by andylegendoneill 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blair and Bush can be indicted in a tribunal if the International Court of Justice finds that the wars that their countries fought were not valid under International Law and they acted in abuse of the executive powers.
2006-07-27 22:42:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
George w is a war monger is guilty of a number of war crimes and should be tried in the hague .he is die\rectly or indirectly responsible for the death of many civilians.the death toll in iraq caused by the american army use of illegal weapons and the secterian violence that erupted would have been a fraction of the chaos that now excists.the invasion was not approved by the un.Bushes continued meddling in the affairs of other countries impacts on us all.america also applies double standards eg not a word was said when pakistan and india fired test missiles but when any other country does so they demand some retribution.
2006-07-27 23:37:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, yes but hopefuly it will be after they are gone from power. Between them they have created a global chaos in both east and the west. A movement should be started involving all the familes of dead soldiers. It would get more attention then.
I watched the news conference in Washington 3 days ago and they both looked well past their sell by dates.
2006-07-30 10:32:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe they should.they start a war without a valid reason, based on unreliable information, and after the war Iraq and Afghanistan is not getting any better then the used before
2006-07-27 22:51:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they shouldn't. All Bush and Blair are attempting to do is spread the great right of freedom around the globe.
2006-07-27 22:46:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by some guy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly, death is an uncertain consequence of joining the military in the first place. It is not like they were all drafted and Bush made them sign contracts. Give them a break and learn to tell your kids not to join.
2006-07-28 00:15:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
definite! The Iraq conflict "has destabilized and polarized the international to an better volume than the different conflict in heritage," wrote Tutu, who replaced into provided the Nobel prize in 1984. "those in charge for this suffering and absence of existence might want to be treading a similar route as a number of their African and Asian friends who've been made to respond to for his or her moves contained in the Hague," he extra.
2016-10-15 07:19:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by maget 4
·
0⤊
0⤋