If Bush could be elected for a 3rd term, how many of you would vote for him again?

Answer 1

bush is a man of character and backbone.

i'd vote for him in a second, AND im in iraq RIGHT NOW

Answer 2

Fortunately for Americans, the maximum length of time a person can be president is 2 terms, unlike here in Canada where the leader of a party can be re-elected over and over again until they either die or get voted out of office.

That being said, there is no guarentee that by ousting a leader or for that matter having their length of terms cease, that you will get anyone better the next time around.

It's been voiced by many that George W.Bush is probably the worst president the United States has ever had. Although that is a current opinion, I am sure that going back since the beginning of the country's origin, there have been numerous presidents who the citizens of the time would say were the worst of all times as well.

The president of the United States, or the leader of any country that is non communist, is basically a fronts person who does not do so much as what the people wish, but more so be the puppet controlled by Big Business.

There is a power much more stronger then any one individual when it comes right down to it.

Bush makes decissions based upon what his advisors tell him to, and they inturn take their orders from Big Business or anyone with money to sweeten the pot so to speak. The levels of corruption run very deep within the political circles, and without anyway of delving into it, or proving it, we are mere patsys to the system we elect.

Perhaps one may wonder as to what the country's shape in the world would be at present if run by someone like Gore,Kerry or for that matter Bill Clinton, given the events that have unfolded since Bush's first term.

I can't help but wonder if the same people would voice approval for anyone of their actions if they were in power at the time of 9-11 or the situation within the middle east.

It's obvious by the majority of those asked, if they indeed support the freedoms they enjoy at the price that is paid through casualties of wars,would support or show lack of support for a war to protect their homeland.

Damned if you do, and of course...damed if you don't show some defense ability when the call of war comes.

Would you rather be victims of some radical terrorist group or some cult of unstable thinking individuals over the government you now have?

It's all to easy to cristisize what we don't support and to defect from the unpopularity issues of those that we do support. We have that option to change sides and either support the one party or the other or to jump back and forth as some people do.

All I know, is that I am damned glad, that I live on this side of the world and not the other.

Answer 3

I wouldn't and probable only 20% of people in this country. But if during the election they used electronic voting machines Bush would get 55% of the votes and would win.

Don't believe the neocons have things rigged up, click on this link http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3695211834018080649

Answer 4

If he could run again, I would vote for him.
He had the stones to make some unpopular decisions that needed to be made. He will take the heat for it throughout history.
It would be nice to let him finish what he started. Hopefully whoever replaces him won't do the "popular" thing and let all those lives given up go to waste by not finishing what was started. A free middle east would most certainly be in our best interest.

Answer 5

NOT A CHANCE!!!!!! I would rather eat my lunch off the floor of a bathroom in a strip club than vote for that looser. I didn't vote for him the last two time ether, I love my country too much to vote for him!

Answer 6

I think it would depend on who the alternative was. If the alternative was another John Kerry or Al Gore, I'd probably go with Bush.

Answer 7

If he could be elected for a 3rd term?......You're trying to make me leave the country aren't you? As too the question, my answer is triple NO.

Answer 8

Bush is so lame now that
some of his government is or should
be turning against him .Think of all the turmoil he has caused
in iraq when all he wanted was theyre unlimited supply of iol
Theyre ppl too!

Answer 9

I voted for him twice.. who the hell was the allternative?! I would absolutely not vote for him again. I would not vote for his brother either, I think the Bush family political dynasty is over forever once he leaves office. Thank God!

Answer 10

I couldn't vote AGAINST him the first two times, but I'd be out passing out fliers about why he sucks if he could try for a third term!

Answer 11

ok i dont think i woudl vote for him but people need to get a f&#$$# clue. Bush didn't go into iraq for oil or else our oil prices wouldn't be 3.30 cents all around the country. Get a clue ignorant people!