2006-07-27 18:11:09 · 6 answers · asked by Torrey O 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No. The US needs more troops in Baghdad, haven't you heard? (Wink, wink, nudge, nudge...) Seems like we have to try to be better policemen.
But tell me, why would we send our best special forces, Rangers and Marines to be policemen in Baghdad? Maybe because it is only a thousand kilometers from Tehran.
Forget about Beirut. We have to take down the big daddy, Iran. And while we are there, we are going to scare the sheets off the sheiks in Saudi Arabia, too.
By this time next year, they will all be singing a different tune, believe me.
2006-07-27 18:17:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't send the into Lebanon,but I would send them into Syria,if Hezbollah runs from Lebanon to Syria we would be there to cut off their retreat,and maby once and for all the terrorism called Palestine would be stopped cold.
2006-07-28 01:15:38 · answer #2 · answered by starfish50 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems like it is going to be France and Turkey that are going to send troops.
2006-07-28 01:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America should open its eyes and stop israeli savages!!!!
ps: 10000 palestinians are in israeli prison, without any trial!!!!! america isn't that beautiful, and fair after all.
2006-07-28 01:15:35 · answer #4 · answered by David F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you're sending them in to expel the Israeli army.
2006-07-28 01:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by bradcymru 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amer-Ka needs to bring her troops home!! and fix our roades and schools!! and tell the mid-east to Kiss our A**! will see you when you all kill each-other!!! and they will.........
2006-07-31 00:17:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋