Seems they always whine about how nobody reports on the good things, can't they just send a reporter and camera man out there.. They've got reporters in Lebonon right next to Hezbollah, can't they go to Iraq as well or is it too far?
2006-07-27 17:27:32 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I chose fox news because they whine about it the most.. Every right wing pundit on there cries about the news from Iraq. They could very easily send a reporter..
2006-07-27 17:32:32 · update #1
Journalists have been to requested not to cover "good things" in Iraq because terrorists watch TV too, and use it to target reconstruction projects.
2006-07-27 17:36:41 · answer #1 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The occupation of Iraq is a smashing success. Sure there have been setbacks. But it's obvious we are in the last throws of the insurgency. Darn liberals are always trying to ruin a good thing.
2006-07-28 00:35:25 · answer #2 · answered by CORSO 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The news seems to get more attention when they report the bad things that are going on in the world verses the good things going on.
2006-07-28 15:09:21 · answer #3 · answered by babybro35 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your just talking about the ten square miles of the green zone. That is the Iraq government, outside that is chaos and the American military as the Government.
2006-07-28 00:42:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good things are boring. The old journalism sayings are "If it bleeds, it leads" and "Jews are news". Put those 2 together and you get wall to wall coverage of Hezbollah yet little coverage where there are tons more deaths. Chalk it up to the business of journalism.
2006-07-28 00:30:49 · answer #5 · answered by Brand X 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They could perhaps report on a good old stoning. Or hanging someone for being gay. Good times.
2006-07-28 00:31:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Didnt know there was ANYTHING good to report on in Iraq?!?!
2006-07-28 00:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They cant keep people all stirred up, if they report the good stuff!!! Their rating would go down, so they get some good ole propaganda goin, and people eat it right up!
2006-07-28 00:32:41 · answer #8 · answered by Katz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why can't any news agency have reporters cover the good things in iraq? its not just fox, its cnn, msnbc, etc...
2006-07-28 00:31:08 · answer #9 · answered by flyguy03 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would cut into The O'Reilly Factor's NO SPIN ZONE rhetoric!
2006-07-28 00:41:25 · answer #10 · answered by CBNYMETS 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋