English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The problem is that sometimes you have to hurt to help and that confuses most liberals, they cannot process that equation. They jump to the erroneous conclusion that the hurt that is being afflicted is wrong without considering the positive results being attained. As a matter of fact, most of the time you can determine what is wrong by asking a liberal what they think is right, usually due to their dyslexic logic, the answer they will give you and their perception of right is actually wrong. For example a liberal will say, "it is wrong to take a human life even if the person is a convicted child molesting murderer", at the same time professing that abortion rights, "pro choice" is right. The taking of an innocent life of an unborn child is right while the saving of a child molesting murderer is wrong. As I said, dyslexic logic. Examine a liberals thought process and you will see that I am correct. (Sorry lefties, you need some serious shock therapy).

2006-07-27 15:42:49 · 13 answers · asked by AmericanSwede 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Your logic isn't right. Pro choice means CHOICE. Liberals want choice even though they don't agree with abortion. You're turning the whole situation into something else. If conservatives are so against abortion -- why isn't it a law? Name one conservative who has passed this law. All it needs is a majority vote but the so called moral majority isn't voting against it.

2006-07-27 15:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 1 0

I'm very left wing, but I don't disagree that sometimes you have to do "hurt to help". I believe war is sometimes right when you are saving more people by what you do, like if we invaded a country and removed a dictator, and in doing so killed 2000 innocents, when he would kill 10 000 in the next ten years, then that is okay in my eyes as you have stopped the bad.

You know well enough that the debate about abortion is not about whether killing a child is okay or not but about at what point an egg and a sperm become a child.

"Dyslexic logic" is a rubbish phrase. It doesn't make any sense, does it now? Dyslexic logic would be regular logic, but maybe spelt wrong or something. Go think up a better phrase, at least, and then start working on understanding some arguments.


Other answerer: "Like if you are atacked by an armed intruder in your own home you need to back off and let them do what ever thay want." No, you don't, how about you point your gun at him and tell him to get out of your house? How about you knock him out? the only options aren't totally give in to him (as preached by Jesus) and kill him (as preached by nutters), you know.

2006-07-27 15:51:46 · answer #2 · answered by Levit 3 · 1 0

So, basically what your saying is "no pain, no gain" and that liberals contradict themselves. Funny you should mention contradiction. Conservatives, as you say, stand for protecting the life of an unborn child, but the lives of the brave and noble men and women of the armed forces are expendable? Not to mention the countless innocent civilian lives that have been lost in this bloody conflict, a conflict that's defense has been changed several times as the previous defense for war falls apart, i.e., weapons of mass destruction. And on top of all of this, people on the right claim that they unite, not divide, yet people like yourself constantly post these uninformed distortions of the issues at hand, blaming democrats/liberals for all the problems when it is very clear that the republicans/conservatives have been in power for quite some time. In regards to the death penalty issue, how is it appropriate to show that killing is wrong by killing murderers? The right seems very concerned with following the teachings of the Bible, so why have they forgotten "Thou shalt not kill" from the Ten Commandments? Or how about "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone"?

No, liberals don't have dyslexic logic.

2006-07-27 16:18:56 · answer #3 · answered by StewyP83 2 · 2 0

Of course liberals are illogical. That is like asking if the sky is blue. Let's forget if abortion is right or wrong for the time being (because we all know it is wrong anyway) and take a look at this argument they are always trying to pass off as valid, "The government shouldn't be involved in abortion." Then in the next breathe, they are saying, "The government should pay for abortions." This is illogical. Either the government is involved or they aren't. If they are involved then they should have a say over the legality of it. If they are not involved then they shouldn't have to pay for it, pay for it your ownself, if you want their laws off your body. If you are some crack whore who got knocked up, pay for it yourself, the taxpayers shouldn't have to. If you are some middle class soccer mom who doesn't want another child, pay for it yourself. Your income shouldn't be a factor, if you want to do it then it should come out of your pocket.
Next the whole keep your laws off my body is another illogical premise. If I did the world a favor and strangled Al Franken or Gloria Feldt, you can bet they would be after the local government to lock me up for assaulting these people. They don't want the laws off their bodies then. When it affects them adversely they want the law completely involved, when they want to hurt others then it is "keep your laws off my body."
Liberals are the most deranged people on the planet. They idolize murderers like Stalin, Castro and Mao Tse Tsung and villianize people of peace like Christ, the Pope and your average law-abiding citizen. The only reason that Hitler doesn't top their list as the greatest hero of all time is because with the predominantly Judeo-Christian population in America, it would mean complete ostracization from mainstream society. They are after all, cowards (if you look closely at their rhetoric you will see just how cowardly they really are.) and could never really defend their beliefs if called to do so.
To call their logic dyslexic is an insult to dyslexics everywhere. For dyslexics usually end up doing whatever they can so they can see things the right way. The way the letters or numbers are supposed to be and not the incorrect way their brain processes it. Liberals are all about doing things the wrong way, they revel in it. They don't take steps to do things right. They hate The Right and they hate the very concept of right and wrong. They are immoral and without conscience. Their only guiding factor is, "Does it feel good and does it affect me adversely?" Whereas with conservatives the guiding factor is "Is this moral and will this have an effect on others?" A clergyman put it best, "Liberalism is the mixture of sickness and evil." I am just glad God took that liberal garbage from my mind and instead put it in His truth. God is good like that.

2006-07-27 16:10:54 · answer #4 · answered by Dena L 1 · 0 2

Liberalism is a faith. It is not fact based or result orientated. Remember "choice" is the candy coating so that women don't feel guilty after they kill thier unborn child. Can you imagine the doctor saying to the women. Don't worry miss that little bastard your carrying in there will be dead in 15 minutes. No they say oh it's choice. Conservatives have not been able to outlaw it becuase of the liberal supreme court finding the right to abortion that does not exist in a 2oo+ year old document.

2006-07-27 15:46:10 · answer #5 · answered by chuckles 1 · 0 1

Man it is cool to be RIGHT.
I find that the liberal thinking is really screwed up.
Like if you are atacked by an armed intruder in your own home you need to back off and let them do what ever thay want. Call the cops and if you should happen to own a gun it must be in a locked box with the ammo in another place and a triger lock in place.
What do you think will happen then.
"" hay person that is aiming that loaded gun at me please hold on before you shoot me and my family while I get my gun out of the lock box and find the ammo and load it and then unlock the triger guard, Thank you for waiting."
Ha you will end up with a hole in your body waiting the three hours for the cops to show up.
Kill all liberals and cure the world.

2006-07-27 15:51:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Being a liberal surely calls for uncritical attractiveness of limitless no longer conceivable "data." as an party, no man or woman has ever encountered a liberal who does no longer declare the fastest way out of debt is to borrow extra; who has no longer referred to as a similar unemployment figure both "melancholy-like" AND "miraculously low" and who does no longer robotically make "X can't = X" form claims and who does no longer declare the excellent-high quality route to any purpose is to do the alternative of what were given you there beforehand.

2016-10-15 07:06:32 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You're the perfect example of the conservative monster.
Let's see, it's ok to murder 30,000 innocent Iraqi's & over
2500 of our own soliders?
It's ok to give millions of dollars to the Middle East, while
cutting off the Katrina victims?
You need a rapid course in common sense & humanity, creep.
Call me names - be my guest - I have plenty for people like you.

Sorry righty, I don't approve of a group of old men standing
around, making decisions for my body, whether I'm for it
or not. They were never female, wait - or were they?!

Just once, I'd like them to make a law to keep themselves
from worrying about everyone & to keep their religious views
to themselves.

2006-07-27 15:56:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Logic in politics is not applied because their reasons is always against the other party up to extent that their arguments become irrational.

2006-07-27 15:46:39 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Not ever liberal believes in abortion. And Most Conservatives, also contradict themselves.

2006-07-27 15:45:02 · answer #10 · answered by Still Halloween 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers