All I see tonight is Liberals trying to pick actual physical fights! Have the arrogant, condensending, all-knowing, progressive, open minded, TOLERANT, liberals run out of logical facts to debate with US conservatives? Emotion has definately taken over because if you did have something intelligent to say - you would be able to use facts & reports to back up your lies. I see no factual back up only threats and invitation to your bars. Thank you guys for showing all of us your limited brain capacity and that you follow the democratic playbook - When liberal arguements are proven flawed - distract people by personal character attacks. Classy move libs!
2006-07-27
14:58:59
·
35 answers
·
asked by
therandman
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
From Jenny is hot - Wasn't the biggest thing the Neocons avoided this administration the Military other then taxes?
Sissy's boys nobody want's you chicken hawks, your never going to reproduce. Blogging at home about Liberals isn't fighting for your Country. Come on down to the bar with my friends were having a neocon Bar B Q...
2006-07-27
15:08:48 ·
update #1
From - Bill is great - Is it a qualification for neocons to be missing their grill? Did a Liberal knock them out for ya?
Additional Details
40 minutes ago
Try saying George Dumbya Bush with your Tobacky a dripping off ye chin...on ye T-shirt..
2006-07-27
15:09:46 ·
update #2
From Pres Chimp - anybody here ever get into a bar fight with a NEOCON and totally destroy them ?
anybody here ever get into a bar fight with a NEOCON and just drag that cowardly NEOCON by the hair and just drag him outside and kick his teeth in and curbstomp his head and totally destroy the worthless NEOCON ?
2006-07-27
15:10:38 ·
update #3
Enough details Scooby?
2006-07-27
15:11:15 ·
update #4
We don't need Ralph Reed - WE have a true patriot ZEL MILLER
2006-07-27
15:25:27 ·
update #5
since I am considered a RICH republican by you guys - I have a generator for my mansion and plenty of natural gas to power it. See being a conservative I have provided for me & my family - I am not wating on the gov't to be my savior. Don't worry though I have compassion & understanding and will open my doors to you when your power goes out!
2006-07-28
01:56:23 ·
update #6
I disagree. Liberals NEVER have had logical arguments. Liberals bring up anything that will distract from the real issues because they know their views are not popular with the American public and are adopted out of selfishness instead of principled and logical thinking.
2006-07-27 15:03:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr. L 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
OK I have seen lots of facts and invitations to debate, yet when challenged you take the Rove approach and just start with the name calling.
You are a pillar of the Republican party, and that's is why lots of red states right now are turning blue right before your eyes.
For heavens sake you cant even get Ralph Reed elected in Georgia.
So go ahead and keep up with the name calling and the distractions in Congress (flag burning, gay marriage, pledge protection) and ignore the issues that matter to the majority of the people, like the pending energy crisis, and your power will be gone before you know it.
Have a nice evening.
2006-07-27 15:21:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by PARKERD 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lord knows there's nothing wrong in the world, and the way the current administration is handling the issues. I'm not going to argue this topic because the issues are too broad. I will say though that perhaps if there weren't any facts or reports to back it up then the Presidents approval rating would be higher.
2006-07-27 15:09:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steve 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree 100%. If you're ever on Yahoo news message boards, watch how they defend Hezbollah and Hamas! The irony is, and I don't know why they can't see it, is that Islam would behead a liberal in a heartbeat! Abortion, gay marriage etc etc, which we tolerate but may not like, is NOT tolerated there at all, and is rewarded with death by hanging or beheading. And yet they continue to defend the terrorists!
2006-07-27 15:03:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So is it me, or are you just starting crap like the rest of your kind? We need a revolution and you and the leftists are the first to be lined up and shot for destroying this country when it comes.
Be constructive and quit YOUR whining.
This same message goes to any LIB who reads this and thinks THEIR way is the ONLY way.
If there is a left and a right - my god, there must be a middle!
2006-07-28 04:29:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by DEP 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are azz backwards. Conservative have the worst logial argument, just look at the crappy logic used to justify the iraq war. And you're buying it. The problem is the democrats have to reason with those fools.
2006-07-27 15:05:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Facts about bush..heres a few to keep you busy The Bush Administration has spent more than $140 billion on a war of choice in Iraq.
Source: American Progress
2. The Bush Administration sent troops into battle without adequate body armor or armored Humvees.
Sources: Fox News, Boston Globe
3. The Bush Administration ignored estimates from Gen. Eric Shinseki that several hundred thousand troops would be required to secure Iraq.
Source: PBS
4. Vice President Cheney said Americans "will, in fact, be greeted as liberators" in Iraq.
Source: Washington Post
5. During the Bush Administration's war in Iraq, more than 1,000 US troops have lost their lives and more than 7,000 have been injured.
Source: globalsecurity.org
6. In May 2003, President Bush landed on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit, stood under a banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished," and triumphantly announced that major combat operations were over in Iraq. Asked if he had any regrets about the stunt, Bush said he would do it all over again.
Source: Yahoo News
7. Vice President Cheney said that Iraq was "the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault for many years, but most especially on 9/11." The bipartisan 9/11 Commission found that Iraq had no involvement in the 9/11 attacks and no collaborative operational relationship with Al Qaeda.
Source: MSNBC , 9-11 Commission
8. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said that high-strength aluminum tubes acquired by Iraq were "only really suited for nuclear weapons programs," warning "we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." The government's top nuclear scientists had told the Administration the tubes were "too narrow, too heavy, too long" to be of use in developing nuclear weapons and could be used for other purposes.
Source: New York Times
9. The Bush Administration has spent just $1.1 billion of the $18.4 billion Congress approved for Iraqi reconstruction.
Source: USA Today
10. According to the Administration's handpicked weapon's inspector, Charles Duelfer, there is "no evidence that Hussein had passed illicit weapons material to al Qaeda or other terrorist organizations, or had any intent to do so." After the release of the report, Bush continued to insist, "There was a risk--a real risk--that Saddam Hussein would pass weapons, or materials, or information to terrorist networks."
Sources: New York Times, White House news release
11. According to Duelfer, the UN inspections regime put an "economic strangle hold" on Hussein that prevented him from developing a WMD program for more than twelve years.
Source: Los Angeles Times
TERRORISM
12. After receiving a memo from the CIA in August 2001 titled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack America," President Bush continued his monthlong vacation.
Source: CNN.com
13. The Bush Administration failed to commit enough troops to capture Osama bin Laden when US forces had him cornered in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan in November 2001. Instead, they relied on local warlords.
Source: csmonitor.com
14. The Bush Administration secured less nuclear material from sites around the world vulnerable to terrorists in the two years after 9/11 than were secured in the two years before 9/11.
Source: nti.org
15. The Bush Administration underfunded Nunn-Lugar--the program intended to keep the former Soviet Union's nuclear legacy out of the hands of terrorists and rogue states--by $45.5 million.
Source: armscontrol.org
16. The Bush Administration has assigned five times as many agents to investigate Cuban embargo violations as it has to track Osama bin Laden's and Saddam Hussein's money.
Source: Associated Press
2006-07-27 15:03:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by tough as hell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes you are right it is a shame that the Liberals have not made up any fake facts, and false reports to back up there arguments like republicans do to support there made up bull. Welcome to the Divided States of America.
2006-07-27 15:09:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm a Dem and yes we ran out of reasonable arguments years
ago, after Kennedy died. I think that messed up the Democratic
Party for ever.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
2006-07-27 15:06:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Classy move with all the name calling. Stick to debating fact and lose the generalizations.
2006-07-27 15:03:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋