I CAN REMEMBER BUSH SAID "WE'VE GOT TO GO TO IRAQ BECAUSE THEY HAVE WMD AND THE INTELLIGENCE IS 'DARN GOOD'" AND ALL THE NEOCONS WERE LIKE, YES IRAQ HAS WMD, THEY ATTACKED NEW YORK ON 9/11 AND WE HAVE TO GOTO WAR IN IRAQ. THEN AFTER IT WAS SHOWN THAT THE INTELLIGENCE WAS FLAWED, BUSH FINALLY ADMITTED IT WAS FLAWED BUT BY THEN HE HAD EVOLVED THE REASONS WE WENT TO WAR AND THE REST OF THE NEOCONS HAD EVOLVED WITH HIM. THEN THEY SAID " YOU CAN'T HOLD IT AGAINST BUSH BECAUSE HE HAD FLAWED INTELLIGENCE" EVEN THOUGH THE DEMOCRATS HAD SAID IT WAS FLAWED ALL ALONG.
2006-07-27 14:56:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually if you read the congressional statement supporting the war there were many reasons given, not just WMD. Same for Bush. Additionally, Bush never said that Iraq was responsible for 9/11. He said they supported terrorism. I don't believe everything he says, but I actually listen to it.
2006-07-27 15:01:04 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not all American's take every word to be the truth, however, in past experience the word of our government is usually more trustworthy than the word of another. The reasons for war are far deeper than WMD's or Israel. The middle east is a breeding ground for Terrorist. Most of the governments are comprised of terrorist groups to some level. A democracy in the middle east will help the G-5 in their attempts to stabalize that area. There is a very clear Axis of Evil in the world today. Iran, Syria, North Korea, China, Cuba, Venenzuela, and a great connection of terrorist groups mostly lead by these governments. These governments upon the receipt of WMD's will have no problem using them against civilian's (SEE: Sept 11th) and misconscrue it so as to appear that a government did it thus the beginning of WWIII. This information is not from our government, but from several governments around the world who take a great deal of interest in the middle east and finding a solution to the problems they face and create.
2006-07-27 15:24:30 · answer #2 · answered by Johnny B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are wrong on so many levels.
1.Noone ever said Iraq was responsible for 9/11..they said that they had Al Qaida links. Which they do. Remember, Zarqawi was killed there????
2. There were more reasons to go to Iraq, WMD was number on on the list.
3. Congress voted to go to war...yes, even your Democrat darlings believed Hussein had WMD...they just can't stand Bush so now they are all bailing...it shows the weakness of the party.
2006-07-27 15:09:22 · answer #3 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dude...take off the cap locks.......President Bush had the same intelligence that his predecessor had and those members congress. Any one with even a shred of intelligence would see the flip flop democridiots agenda. But they were sure on the band wagon like everyone else. The Democrats did not say it was flawed all along. There you are incorrect. Lieberman and Clinton both agree on the war (still not enough to give hillary my vote), You need to start listening to more than just your handlers voice.
2006-07-27 15:04:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flawed or not we went to Iraq and thank God Almighty we did.
We went to Afghanistan before that and now Israel is going
after Hezbollah. Sooner or later, and I believe sooner we are
going to crush these Islamo Fascist criminal terrorist, once
and for all.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
EDIT: Bush is good but he's got a long way to go to secure
the southern border. He and most politicians have gone against
the American people on this issue.
2006-07-27 15:12:01 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Critics will always look into the words of others in order to find loopholes and mistakes to point. Criticism is good but it must be constructive.
2006-07-27 15:03:37 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservative or Liberal, some people believe anything, or they believe wha they want to believe.
Sometimes democracy sucks, but nobody has thought up a better system yet.
2006-07-27 15:00:26 · answer #7 · answered by aka DarthDad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is easier to watch infotainment on the television and put a bumper sticker on your car then to read.
2006-07-27 15:01:50 · answer #8 · answered by pkb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is things like Faux news and people like Rush (wiffy stiffy) Limbaugh that gives them their ideas. They do not have a original thought. Just watch their post here and you can determine that, I have.
2006-07-27 15:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
2006-07-27 15:09:14 · answer #10 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋