because we want to free them from a tyrant? After all that is the only remaining excuse for going to Iraq..all the others have proven to be lies...so..does history bear out our one remaining reason?
2006-07-27 14:35:14 · 13 answers · asked by Plan 9 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
actually, the american policy is the best arms dealer of the world, the merchant of death, dogs of war, they are best liar in foreign policy, there is always strings attached to thier donations and loans, they never help poor countries without exchange , that why they called it american economy and policy, attacking nations with all the smiles and dagger and chain on the back hand.
2006-07-27 14:42:32 · answer #1 · answered by lepactodeloupes 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We dont just go around attacking other Countries, you moron!! We were attacked, do you expect us to just sit back and take it like cowards????????
The first time Osama attempted to blow up the Towers was in 1993, it was when Clinton was President, and he did nothing! (NOT SURPRISING) Had he acted like a President should, we may not be in this position right now.
Theres a little History lesson, Im sure you didnt know, now stop saying crap that isnt true!!
2006-07-27 21:55:16 · answer #2 · answered by Katz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have no business attacking other nations with the sole purpose of expanding our form of government. That puts us in a class with the old time Russians. Regardless of how bad Saddam was he was no danger to the U.S. and that has been proved.
2006-07-27 22:13:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All I know is that the United States has helped get rid of many tyrants.
History concerns the past...not the present.
2006-07-27 21:40:38 · answer #4 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We get involved in war only when we must. Iraq was part of a larger terrorist effort against the US because it was headed by a terrorist who was anti-US. He was part of a major effort to destabilize our country.
We did not attack the World Trade Center or our embassy in Africa or our navy ship. Terrorists did and they must be stopped.
How would you stop them?
2006-07-27 21:57:06 · answer #5 · answered by m15 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All presidents attack other countries.
The presidents foreign policies are not governed by congress (not by much).
Its all for the history books, especially in their last term.
2006-07-27 21:55:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmmmmmmmmm. I want to say I believe it, but I am not 100% sure. I still think we did it to finish what Bush 1 forgot to finish and to protect our oil.
2006-07-27 21:41:03 · answer #7 · answered by Boo R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
attacking? i dont think we attack other countries, thats ridiculous. i think of america as the world police. and i still argue with myself that we only help countries that we can benefit from (oil as an example) but still with all good there is still evil. america helps everyone in ned
2006-07-27 21:40:11 · answer #8 · answered by juicy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it seems a bit silly... especially when there are guys out there that make Saddam look like a nice guy
2006-07-27 21:42:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do
the us cant go on without war..
just like blood for humans
2006-07-27 21:41:15 · answer #10 · answered by Jordanian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋