Theories abound, I just want to know yours. We know of the personal links, but saying it might make me anti-American. Pro Bushites, please explain why we haven't caught one man yet, when we seem to be able to catch all his accomplices.
2006-07-27 14:10:42 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chris M, But we were told he is the world's most evil man, Iraq and Afghanistan, and Hezbollah and Hamas and anything you want to destroy was because of him. We should be aiming for the cause not the symptom.
2006-07-27 14:18:39 · update #1
therandman, The world's resources were not concentrated on finding Eric Rudolph.
2006-07-27 14:20:59 · update #2
Oh you mean the man responsible for taking down the World Trade Center. I thought that was Saddam? I'm so confused, I had my head so far up Pres Bush's butt I was told to believe everything he said. Ohhh Yea... Therandman is brilliant. It's much easier to invade a country in 3 years and install a democracy. I'm sure the U.S. had the entire military in N.C. looking for the man. What a Douche Bag.
2006-07-27 14:14:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, given the 4 countries that he could be in...it would be almot impossible to search the 3 million squar kilometers of mountains, desert, brush, towns, caves, etc, that he could be hiding in. Add to that fact, that every time an area is searched, or is about to be searched, they can move to another area or even another country. He may never be found...or he may trust the wrong individaul (like some of his accomplices) and be set up. Although, being the sick, warped terrorist that he is, he is probably way too paranoid to trust anyone except for the few that he has taken with him since the beginning.
(Side note: You ever notice that although these terrorist leaders talk their followers into suicide bombings and such, with all these abstract promises, they don't believe their stories enough to ever do any of the actions themselves? You'd think the followers would catch on eventually.)
2006-07-27 14:24:54 · answer #2 · answered by jimmy h 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well since we are still in the middle of a war that has gone horribly wrong, and is taking way longer than Bush expected, and is much more exp. than bush expected, and is getting huge public backlash, that is the main concern for him right now.
Also the fact that the Bush administration masterfully misled the public into believing that the Iraqis were someway respocible for terrorism, has gotten a majority of Americans to focus on winning the fight in Iraq as a solution to our terrorist fears as opposed to the capturing of BinLaden which most people have mostly forgotten about since is recieves absolutly no headlines, or other media attention.
The bush administration is only concerned with what is going to affect votes now, and this is just not one of them
2006-07-27 14:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by Brocktoon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since Bin Laden and his family have long held and extensive ties with the Bush clan, and since he was probably instrumental in helping BushCo pull off 9-11 and the controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center Towers, and since he handed the Neo-Cons the "New Pearl Harbor" they needed, he will never be "caught". His ties with the Bush family go way back, the beginning can be traced back to the time when Bin Laden was CIA Agent Tom Ossman.
2006-07-27 14:19:55 · answer #4 · answered by JAR2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Havent You Heard??
Hes Living In A Guest House On A Ranch In Crawford Texas
2006-07-27 14:14:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama bin Laden is expert in escape and evasion better than the CIA and other special units. This is the reason why he can roam around the world without being captured unlike Saddam. If ever he is caught, the CIA should get him as a trainer for the excape and evasion course.
2006-07-27 14:15:30 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's another question answer - How long did it take us to find Eric Rudolph in the mountains of North Carolina? 5 years. That's just 1 man in the mountains of NC. Population of NC is 8,049,313.
So to put it into perspective OBL (1 man) in the mountains of Pakistan, surrounded by numerous people protecting him & who don't care for us makes it alittle hard. World population is 6,446,131,400. Statistically speaking it took 5 years with 8 million so it will take much longer to find OBL. We could proably find him quicker if you would like for us to disrespect Pakistan's soveringty and nukes.
2006-07-27 14:13:48 · answer #7 · answered by therandman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's amazing they found Saddam with 100,000 troops...
but all of a sudden finding one man is impossible... it makes it harder when you only have a few thousand looking for him... (there are 20,000 in Afghanistan total... and all of them aren't looking for him) and you won't let your guys go into the country that he is most likely in...
But hey... the Pakistanis are trustworthy and I'm sure they will find him in a region they can't even keep under control... much less find a man in...
and I really doubt they have caught all his accomplices... they catch a low level guy and parade him around like a top general... and for every one we've caught... I bet there are 10 we haven't yet...
2006-07-27 14:33:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush has killed over 2,500 American soldiers in Iraq, injured over 20,000 of them in Iraq, spent nearly HALF A TRILLION dollars in Iraq and he's still BSing us that there is a link to 9/11 and Iraq....
Osama's Bin Forgotten.
2006-07-27 14:15:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bunker Buster - Afghanistan cave
2006-07-27 14:13:50 · answer #10 · answered by likeitis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋