English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or better yet, why do so many HATE her? Is it because she is intelligent, powerful, her own woman, or because she is connected to Bill Clinton? Or is it something I have not even thought of? Enlighten me.

2006-07-27 13:33:32 · 36 answers · asked by Pilar L 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

36 answers

You hit the nail on the head. She is intelligent, powerful, does not flip flop nor waver . Billy boy's indiscretion she bore with Grace and dignity. Many men do feel threatened by strong out-spoken women. You see a lot of it on this site.
I don't hate her, I admire her a great deal. I'm proud to be a stand up woman! You go girl!

2006-07-27 13:44:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

hillary is a treasonous turn coat and it will be a circus come 2008 when she opens her lesbian mouth for the first time and announces her run. As a conservative I cant wait to watch it on TV I might even get cable to brighten the picture. Its going to be the vagina monologues if she wins - And she wont - The conservative vote - the people who own a gun or / and a bible are going to come out of their comfort zone to knock her out of the race. This broad has no track record for running anything but her big mouth. I can't say what kind of senator she is - New York deserves what they get from it though. I really dislike that state and the city - A woman president - what a laugh - this country has yet to produce one woman leader of substance on the leftest
side of the issue - not one.On the other side conservatives have Jean Kirkpatrick and Phyllis Shafly ( who has been black balled from the media for being smart and conservative at the same time)

2006-07-27 15:06:48 · answer #2 · answered by PAUL W 2 · 0 0

I hope to God she does not run for the Democratic Party for President of USA. She did such a miss justice to all women around the world and here also, when she treated her husband the President of the USA, at that time, like what he and his White house (I call her girlfriend, as you cannot print what she really was)girl friend were doing while he was suppose to conducting official presidential business, like oh, hum, so what attitude. I don't care what her excuse was, she did no favor to any of us women. It sent a message out to all men, that it is all right to have extra-mart-ital affairs. If it had been her that had carried on this affair we would have not heard the end of it. This is my biggest thing I have against the woman. Oh by the way, did she ever divorce that bum?

2006-07-27 13:53:18 · answer #3 · answered by Pat N 1 · 0 0

She is dishonest and sneaky...she is a lesbian without the courage to come out of the closet. Seven of Bill Clinton's appointments were "out of the closet lesbians", all recommended for high office by Hillary. Were she president, imagine how many of her appointments would not be straight.

Straight people are aware of this and will be there to vote "no" when the time comes.

2006-07-27 13:43:11 · answer #4 · answered by j.ruddy@sbcglobal.net 1 · 0 0

We fear her for the same reason we feared Hitler -- she poses a threat to our freedom. Her socialist policies would put business in chains, and all but end the free market. Even worse, her plans like "Hilary Care" would give the government further power to intrude into our lives.

With the end of freedom, would come the end of prosperity. By nationalizing health care, for example, she will erect a wall of bureaucrats between citizens and their health care; this will increase the time to receive a procedure, and decrease the pay of many talented doctors, driving them from the field. Under Hilary Clinton, all heart attacks may be fatal.

Thus, Hilary puts our freedom -- and the prosperity it makes possible -- in danger

2006-07-27 13:42:49 · answer #5 · answered by evan s 2 · 0 0

She does little for America- she always takes the side of foreign countries. She also flip-flops on issues- as she did with the immigration debate. However, the main reason I don't like her is for her theories that the government and more community interaction are needed for children to be raised. Families are the only thing needed for children to be raised- and thanks to the government/liberal media preaching extreme forms of feminism, many women have children in throw-away marriages (or no marriage at all) and then can't raise them on their own. They then become dependant on government aid and/or their children's child support to live, and often have even more children with the same guy and/or other guys in order to produce more welfare and/or child support babies. In an attempt to cover up their mistakes, they argue that the government does not do enough for families, it’s impossible for single women to raise children in America because of gender-discrimination, etc. and idiots like Hillary Clinton and her liberal friends go along with this in order to get more votes. I'm not saying that they should be for making the purpose of every woman's life to cook, clean, and reproduce, but they also shouldn't be for putting one parent- the mother- per family while the father is out adding more pregnant one-night-stand women to his list of playmates.

You argue that she is intelligent? She comes up with ideas that look good on paper but don't work. (Like communism.....but, I digress.) She also screams to state her points- what intelligent person does that? You argue that she is her own woman? She is playing her cards in a way that changes constantly- her positions change constantly. It's also pretty obvious that she is going to lean towards positions on issues that the feminists support- god knows they are going to want her elected because she is a woman. You also argue that she is powerful? That's something that can't be denied- although she's powerful for all the wrong reason.

P.S. I also agree with riding dirty's theory- something about her face and mannorisms just cry out that she is a child of the beast/the product of the devil himself. XD

2006-07-27 14:53:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. She is a politician. She has changed her stance on issues continuously as polls change.

2. She is a socialist. She wants the government to control every aspect of our lives.

3. She is a leech. She despises her own husband (he's been cheating on her since before he was governor of Arkansas), but rides his coattails just for the political power.

4. She is a carpetbagger. Instead of running for the Senate in her home state of Arkansas (where she knew she'd loose), she ran in New York.

2006-07-27 13:38:08 · answer #7 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 0 0

Because she is a screeching harpy. While in the White House, she treated the military escorts like common trash. She wants power for it's own sake and will use whatever power she gains to bully those she can.

On second thought, the screeching harpy line was too polite.

2006-07-27 13:37:57 · answer #8 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0 0

It is because she is a totally capable woman who truly COULD BE be President and yet is powerful in her own right because even Bill Clinton fears her wrath.

2006-07-27 13:40:12 · answer #9 · answered by crystal.gaze 1 · 0 0

Disagree. she will be able to win,the polarization is overvalued.it is not any longer because they're loud they're with plenty. bill Clinton had his haters too and replaced into seen polarizing.yet he gained and left the white abode with severe approval rankings regardless of the smears and dirt slinging of the right. Hillary will win with a landslide.little doubt in my options.also because the GOP has yet to placed up one extreme candidate.

2016-10-15 07:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I used to hear the stories of ole Hillary when they came to Washington. I had friends on Joints Chiefs who worked for Colin Powell. Let's just say, she is really not a very nice person, and we'll leave it at that.

2006-07-27 13:37:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers