who is she?
2006-07-27 11:50:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe not shot but she is not guilty because she was insane at the time she did this. That is the most ridiculous ruling since the OJ trial. She still did what she did and should be on death row. Not evaluated in the nut house and released in a couple of years after some a**hole decides she is ok to get back into society.
2006-07-27 16:51:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by dolfan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I must not be with the times- who is Andrea Yates??
2006-07-27 16:46:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Debs 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I always say eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, life for a life and in this case times 5
2006-07-27 17:35:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by tweety 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i totally disagree with the jury this is like opening a flood gate for mothers to kill there children,, and plead insanity,, heck I'm a little krazy but killing my children never crossed my mind she is nothing but a cold blooded killer and should be sentenced to death but that's just my thoughts
2006-07-27 16:46:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by TeNNeSSee PrIde 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think shooting her would be too kind compared to what she did. I think she should be tortured in the same manner and the same fear put into her that she put into her children.....then killed!!
2006-07-27 16:52:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by saturnsl2_98 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not me. Publicly & televised drowned, YES!!!
2006-07-27 16:44:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by grrl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't care if she is a sick *itch. She needs to pay for what she did. Yeah, she's sick, she killed her children.
2006-07-27 21:34:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Birdlegs 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
can u show me her picture first? then i'll tell u
2006-07-27 16:44:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by WHAT!!! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
drowned, revived, drowned, revived, drowned, revived, drowned, revived and then drown one last time.
2006-07-27 16:45:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋