English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They look like little ignorant kids whenever they do. Don't they know human nature? If America disbanded our military the rest of the world would be willing to take dominance of the world in our place. If you have something you don't give it away, or else you will be taken advantage of. Don't the liberals get this? Or do they live in a little fantasy world?

2006-07-27 09:31:36 · 21 answers · asked by New Jersey Steve 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Mike: Clinton attempted to disband 80% of our military. Do some research

2006-07-27 09:36:40 · update #1

21 answers

They base all of their political views for votes! That is why the Republicans are viewed as racist and haters of the middle class and the poor. Without those votes they would never ever take office. I am a Republican and I am middle class and have never been a racist. They are the one's who fuel the fire in this country to spread hatred instead of trying for peace. How about that for a turn around. By making Republicans out to be racist bad guys who care about nothing more than money is malicious, vicious an unneccessary. Peace for them is just an illusion. You are absolutely correct about Bill Clinton and disbanding the military. That was one of his first goals as soon as he entered office. I hope none of the people answering this question vote because they clearly do not know fact from fiction.

2006-07-27 09:45:10 · answer #1 · answered by Andi 2 · 2 0

And since you like war so much, why are you here? Shouldn't you be over in Iraq, fighting the war you believe in SO MUCH (scathing scarcasm)? Not another chicken hawk are you like Rumsfeld and Cheney and Rush Limbaugh and all the rest of the pro war crowd who never got within a thousand miles of combat, are you? A conservative hypocrite? Oh, a redundancy, sorry.

Re Clinton "disbanding" the military...Remember that the Soviet Union disbanded in 1991, the military was geared to fight a land war in Europe v. the Soviet Union, so keeping the military in that configuration would have been a gigantic waste of money. I mean if the enemy you are geared to fight does not even exist any more, why be prepared to fight that enemy? There is zero doubt conservatives would have bi t ched like he ck if President Clinton HAD kept the military in that expensive and needless configuration.

2006-07-27 09:38:45 · answer #2 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0 0

Are you kidding me??!! lol!

Don't know that I know of ANYONE who thinks that the military should be disbanded. I think you are just talking out of your butt.

Sometimes war IS necessary, sometimes war ISN'T necessary. Fighting isn't going to solve ALL of the problems in the world. Sometimes it's better to use ones brain than ones fists.

The liberals and people such as yourself both sound like ignorant kids as far as I'm concerned - only seeing the world in black OR white is a dangerous thing.

Add:
I wasn't aware that you were speaking in terms of something that Clinton attempted to do 14+ years ago, as your question is stated in the present tense.

2006-07-27 09:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by sugarlovenugget 3 · 0 0

Nobody is advocating that we disband the military, it is still (obviously) a need and a (lessening) deterrent.

Humans evolved from cavemen and anarchy into civilization, why is it so hard to believe that eventually we can achieve a peaceful world? The alternative to achieving a peaceful world is that in time we will likely wipe ourselves out. While I am positive we will not achieve an equitable and peaceful world in my lifetime, it doesn't mean it will never happen. So take your head out of your *** and try and start thinking for yourself vs. just along party lines.

2006-07-27 09:44:30 · answer #4 · answered by Bobby W 2 · 0 0

we are saying that because they're whining. i'm particular all them patriotic, "genuine human beings" must be proud that the President of u . s . of u . s . has received so prestigious of an honor. Oh, wait, patriotism for some stops even as a guy from the 'different' party occupies the White abode, correct? rather, we do imbecilic such issues as celebrate an American city no longer being chosen for the Olympic video games because we are expecting of it by some ability diminishes the President. We have interaction in a lot gnashing of tooth even as the President receives the Nobel Peace Prize because we are full of such blind hatred that the solid for u . s . and for our status international huge is trumped by the blind hatred for the guy that received it. Sorry, I very nearly offered the fallacy that 'conservatives' are patriotic. satisfied I got here decrease back to my senses.

2016-10-15 06:49:22 · answer #5 · answered by pantle 4 · 0 0

I think it's some kind of mental disease - deluding yourself that if you say "peace, peace, peace" -all will turn out to be o.k. But they lack the comprehension that some nation s in this world are not so friendly no matter what you do.
Add to that the peculiar phenomenon the many americans have some sort of self hatred towards their own nation and anything it represents.

2006-07-27 09:40:21 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Y 2 · 0 0

You're brainwashed. (most) Liberals support the military just like cons do. Liberals though, don't just want to willy-nilly send troops in for no good reason.

Diplomacy and pursuit of peace should always be the first course of action. Its much less costly in human tolls, monetary costs and good-will in this global society.

2006-07-27 09:39:04 · answer #7 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0 0

Why do right wingers always ask stupid questions? The rest of the world would be willing to take dominance? WTF? Oh that's right, I forgot that before 9/11 the whole world was conspiring against America. Do you know why Russia said they would never attempt to destroy us? The reason is because America will self-destruct within itself and if we have another President like your precious GWB, that's exactly what's going to happen!

2006-07-27 09:38:54 · answer #8 · answered by Shelby67grl 3 · 0 0

I am going to have to go with the "they live in a little fantasy world" answer because it's true. They base all of their thoughts off of feeling instead of logic or fact. Their intentions are usually good but seriously misguided.

2006-07-27 09:37:48 · answer #9 · answered by Matt I 2 · 0 0

B: Fantasy world

2006-07-27 09:35:35 · answer #10 · answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers