"I hate Bush...Do you hate Bush, too ?" IS THis ALL Liberals can come up with ???

Answer 1

Yes I hate Bush. I have been to 9 of my best friends funerals because of him. People that I partied with, played football with, faught side by side with, and swore to be friends for ever.
I had to comfort their parents as their sons (my best friends) bodies were lowered into a hole.
I knew that they went over there to fight. I understood that. But they died AFTER the " war" was over. After they did what they went over there to do.
Yeah I hate Bush

Answer 2

I used to, but it is hard to hate a stupid, manipulative and manipulated fool. This idiot sold his soul to the Devil, literally! American blood will spill all over the world forever because of the chain of events this administration allowed to happen and the chain of events they manufactured afterwards.

You have to learn to hate Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfiwitz and many other superior intellects using Dubya as the front man. But to answer the back end of your question, Liberals do not need to do a blessed thing really. Just sit back and watch this administration destroy the American way of life and with it the American Dream. Money for war and nothing else.

Uncle 'Yosemite' Sam says "Give me the poor and indigent folk as well as all newcomers and I'll give you a Nation of the richest protected from global evil - WE NEED YOU!

Answer 3

I don't know whether you would count them as liberals, but some people say Bush is the Antichrist (or at least his spitting image).
http://covenantnews.com/baldwin020412.htm
http://www.markswatson.com/bushac.htm
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=798

There is even some "proof" for it on this website:
http://www.bushisantichrist.com/

According to some, pope John Paul II thought Bush was the antichrist too.
http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2005/05/pope_john_paul_.html

You can even sign a petition for his successor, asking him to declare that Bush is indeed the Antichrist.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?B6U6S6H&1

Answer 4

It's all their feeble minds can come up with. When they do in fact ask a question, it normally is full of lies and half truths, or takes the form of a rage against that which they don't understand. They are discontent with their lives,not working(judging by the times they are on this site) so they sit around filing up their boring lives with this. Suggestion.....go get a REAL job.

Answer 5

Personally, I don't hate Bush. I just don't think he has any business being the President. He's got one of those "It's my way or the highway" mentalities, and people like that are simpletons.

Answer 6

Some of the worlds most influential minds are liberals. So not all liberals are dumb.

Bill Gates
Warren Buffet

For example.

Answer 7

I am a Liberal,, I do not hate,, anyone,,, I hate what Bush has done to our country,,, he and his fiscal Conservative crony's,,,, your just another typical Republican who will not state a position other than make statements that you say are made by others,,,,,

Answer 8

Lol, we don't hate Bush anymore than we hate anyone that's born ret*rded. We feel pity and a sense of regret for him and wish that he didn't have to make all these "hard and taxing decisions" when they are CLEARLY above his CAPABILITIES. He needs a "sponsor," someone who can guide him and lead him and tell him when to potty, things like that.

Hate, no, pity, yes.

Answer 9

He is doing an extremely difficult job... and I'm certain he is trying to do what is best for this country... he lives here too!
I am glad I don't have the stress & responsibility he has, but I stand behind our President. I think he has overall made good decisions. Some better than others... but Pres. Bush has definitely accomplished a lot. There have been many positive results from his efforts, despite the devistating situations he has had to deal with.

Not everyone likes the President, but they should consider it could be much worse. They could live in a country where the leaders use their own people as guinea pigs to test chemical weapons on them.

Here is a little food for thought --

Some claim that President Bush shouldn't
have started this war; consider the following:

1. FDR led us into World War II.
Germany never attacked us; Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...
an average of 112,500 per year.

2. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea.
North Korea never attacked us .
From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ...
an average of 18,334 per year.

3. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.
Vietnam never attacked us.

4. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire
From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost ...
an average of 5,800 per year.

5. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.
Bosnia never attacked us.

Clinton was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three
times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on
multiple occasions.

*** In the years since terrorists attacked us , President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. ***

People are complaining about how long the war is taking...
but it took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound... that was a 51-day operation.

We've been looking for evidence for chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and our Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!

*** Pres. Bush has pledged $15 billion to fight the AIDS pandemic in Africa. Last year the US gave $114 million to Ethiopia alone. ***

Both artists, Bono and Bob Geldof have praised Pres. Bush for his efforts and support in Africa.

ABC News reported Bono as saying, "Well, I think the message is right on target, and the president deserves a great deal of credit there."

A Washington Times article read, Mr. Bush recently pushed a $15 billion AIDS bill through Congress.
"His $15 billion commitment is unparalleled," said Melvin Foote, executive director of the nonpartisan Constituency for Africa. "Clinton offered $300 million, parking-meter money, even though he knew it was a tremendous challenge."
Even liberals have credited Mr. Bush with doing more than his predecessor to help Africa. In May, Live Aid founder Bob Geldof said Mr. Bush is far more committed than Mr. Clinton to fighting AIDS and famine on the continent.
"Clinton talked the talk and did diddly squat, whereas Bush doesn't talk but does deliver," said Mr. Geldof, an Irish musician and activist who in 1985 staged the world's largest rock concert to combat starvation in Africa.
"You'll think I'm off my trolley when I say this, but the Bush administration is the most radical, in a positive sense, in the approach to Africa since Kennedy," he said.

In February actor Richard Gere lashed out against Mr. Clinton's record during an AIDS benefit attended by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat.
"Senator Clinton, I'm sorry, your husband did nothing for AIDS for eight years," Mr. Gere said from the podium.

Answer 10

Hahahahhahahahah!

yes. Actually all liberals can really do is grunt and signal to eachother. Farr less developed individuals than the likes of you.