English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know the answer but it wouldnt be a question if I said it, so you may answer. Its really too bad that our president allowed it to happen and then tried to pawn it off on the incoming president. Will the Clintons ever stand trial for the murders?

2006-07-27 09:15:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Thank you god, i thought among all these idiots i wouldn't find some one that knows Clinton is to blame, him and his soft attitude toward the terrorist, to busy getting his dicked sucked to prevent 911

it was his fault, bush cam into office and immediately took us out of that stupid anti killer satellite treaty

2006-07-27 09:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

The Clintons did not murder those people any more then you or I. Billy should have elimintate Bin Laden in the eight years that he was in office. Big George should have eliminated him in the 4 that was in, and Ronnie should have never helped to create him. Hind site is 20/20 on 9/10 a highjacked plane meant the plan was being taken to a foreign country and that we could barter for the release of the hostages. 9/11 that all changed. None of the 4 men that had been president could have imagined what was going happen. That is why they were able to pull it off. I do not like the Clintons, I truely beleive they are corupt, but to blame any president for what happened is wrong. If you are going to beleive that, then you may as well beleive the security guard was to blame for letting the planes enter the buildings. It may sound totally rediculous, but it is the same.

2006-07-27 17:15:53 · answer #2 · answered by Bill S 3 · 0 0

ACTUALLY, that's the BUSH Dynasty your talking about.

Its a KNOWN and published FACT that Jeb Bush dined with Osama's brother on 09/10/'01 (the night prior to 09/11/'01) so that perhaps he could get the dirt firshand, possbily?? And WHOA, Prez. Bush JUST HAPPENED to be in Florida the NEXT DAY (Jeb Bush Country???). How convienient is that? Just my opinion. Who knows, I could be wrong, but see, that's the difference between us, I'll say that much where you won't.

So, WHILE THE ONLY, ONLY people allowed in American AIRSPACE on 09/11/'01 by Presidental ORDERS were Saudi Arabians and member's of the bin Laden Family (do the research) why weren't anyone else allowed to fly out after the towers fell? I'm sure OTHER WEALTHY FAMILIES were worried too!!! Easy, it ALL COMES DOWN TO CONNECTIONS.

Also, since Bill and Hillary were out of the White House how many years? they had what kind of impact? roflmao! and even Cundaleeza Rice said about the infamous memo "Osama bin Laden determined to strike INSIDE the U.S." months before the Twin Tower's fell.

2006-07-27 16:25:38 · answer #3 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0 0

This is sad.
you are sad

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/interviews/drumheller.html

"Something terrible is going to happen," and he just can't get anybody to focus on it. He said, "Tenet's been talking to the White House."

Then, by the end of July, he said, "It seems to have gone away." Then in early August, they did the PDB [President's Daily Brief] piece for the president on that. But there was a sense. I saw it in [Deputy Director of Operations James] Pavitt; I saw it in Tenet; I saw it in my friend -- [then-CTC Director] Cofer Black's a very close friend of mine. I saw it in all these guys, that they were desperately trying to get the people to focus on this. This was a real threat.

It wasn't that people were blasé about it. It's just that the new administration had a million different things, and this wasn't what they were -- it just didn't seem to be resonating.

2006-07-27 16:20:28 · answer #4 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0 0

The Clintons didn't kill anyone, why should they stand trial? They were partly the cause by never giving a strong response to such things as the first WTC attack.....The Cole.....emabssies.....etc etc......learn to hold responsible those that do the deeds....Clinton you can hold reesponsible for not letting the terrorists that we don't F*uck with people like that....Bush is letting them know now

2006-07-27 16:19:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It isn't a valid question anyhow. I suppose it was Clinton's fault that Bush senior left Saddam in power, too. Easier to blame a popular president. Anyhow, you guys are just mad that he did a great job, and got a BJ, as well. Get over it. We will give you someone else to blame in a couple of years...

2006-07-27 16:38:42 · answer #6 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0 0

I thought Cheney was secretly our president all these years...you mean to tell Clinton has been the one?
Hey dumb *** Bush was the guy on 9-11, and when given reports of the possibility of an attack, he blew it off.

2006-07-27 16:26:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ummm....we all know it was Bush who allowed it to happen. advisors told him that bin laden was active since his inauguration, he went for for how many months (from inauguration to 9/11) without ANY action to prepare or prevent this tragedy? it was Bush who failed to stop the attack. ever hear of Richard Clark, security advisor to Regan, H W Bush, and Clinton? He came on as security advisor to W Bush and immediately informed Cheney, Rummy, Rice and Bush about Al Quaeda. All they wanted to talk about was Iraq. Do a little research and you might learn something. in addition, Bush's handling of the attack was completely incompetent. why weren't intercepting air force units deployed? you are so backwards it's a shame.

2006-07-27 16:26:18 · answer #8 · answered by jimvalentinojr 6 · 0 0

Still try to blame Clinton for everything!!

And who said Bush wasn't involved in 9/11??

What has all those killed in Iraq have to do with 9/11???

2006-07-27 16:19:46 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

Because the Bush Administration was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
Is this a trick question?

2006-07-27 16:19:26 · answer #10 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 0

You are the biggest idiot out there. Wait, Bush is. He is the one that let 9/11 happen so he could invade Iraq. It was his officals who ignored the warnings. He should be put on trial. No, he should be kept in prison without any rights, just like he is doing.

2006-07-27 16:20:34 · answer #11 · answered by Red Sox Fanatic 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers