Leogirl, Israel fired the first rockets and the ACTIONS would in fact be apples to apples.
If we want to take over the entire country of Mexico like Israel wants the 'promised land', yes. We should be allowed to attack.
Morally, we shouldn't and Israel should not have acted the way they did. People can't think objectively in the US. Both sides are wrong.
2006-07-27 09:01:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by DEP 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Stop trying to use logic to analyze this situation. There is nothing logical about what is going on now. Surely you've hear the definition of insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. We lost what 3,500 on 9/11 and how many hundreds of thousand have we killed since then? As long as some nations have a significant edge in technology and the ability to inflict massive casualties against inferior opposition, terrorism will flourish. The reason is simple, the haves will always tend to throw their weight around and the have nots will always respond with undercover operations that inflict pain upon the haves. Our only real alternative is genocide which we are culturally disinclined to pursue. So we'll continue these half baked actions and continue to support Israel even when they respond to provocation in disproportionate force. But you can count on being called names because you see that the simple explanation of killing all Islamics is probably immoral and impractical.
2006-07-27 09:08:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by McGrath 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are to apreciate press do not bash around critisizm on foreigners and wars. Drug dealers make a living on necessity and demand for party enhancers, it is a honest aproach to recognise their importance not their nonexistant crime, under the law. According to law in the world, medicines are privilege of understanding and control. These folks do see the privilege they have on behalf of comerce without borders and taxes. That aids other merchants with ordinary trade and liquour. If people do not apreciate the goodies that is their loss, now some want extra fun, so they go to brothels, drink unexpensive liquour, have unexpensive drugs and have great sound systems for less than $200. If that is not style, then what is?
Now, changing subject, in Palestine there is a serious problem with radio waves and electric discharges, lets not believe everything we see on tv, it is of no importance the explosion of these cities so far from home, is it? I mean, some politicians are already there, and if there was someone already winning we would know of it and un citizens would not be killed. This is the third time un officers are killed, first in Sudan, then in Bosnia, now in Israel. Will someone tell these folks nobody apreciates their presence in those murderers´ neighbourhoods?
Now, you maniac, be aware your words can be taken very seriously, nobody likes to have his or her city torn ablaze with missiles from a hated country such as yours. Bye.
2006-07-27 09:08:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Manny 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK then, my question to you is 'How far should have Isreal went?' Should they have only taken as many hezbollahs as Israelis that were taken? I'm sure if the drug lords began to shoot rockets into the US, Mexico would not be a country anymore. To me if a country can't stop there drug lords, then someone else will. Since Lebenon has decided not to deal with Hezbollah, then Israel has decided to take matters into there own hands. That's just my opinion.
2006-07-27 09:03:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by freemanbac 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Has Mexico threatened to push the United States into the ocean? Is Mexico allied with a regime in Iran that is developing nuclear weapons? Does the president of Mexico (whoever he is?) claim the Holocaust never happened? In the last 50 years how many Mexicans have strapped bombs to themselves and blown up coffee shops in El Paso? I think it's more like apples to pears.
2006-07-27 08:59:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nuke Lefties 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are you blaming the Mexican government? The Guards had an ordeal with the aid of a jury 12 individuals, they have been got here across to blame. do you be responsive to each and all the info of the trial? Do have self assurance each thing this is published on the cyber web? study the courtroom transcripts. sure, the shield exchange into overwhelmed. yet tortured? What are you basing torture on ? What did Bush pardoned Johnny Sutton for? below the regulations of the land Jimmy Sutton did his interest. If the guards shop on with approaches and the regulation, and earlier warnings to the two guards approximately approaches and hiding evidences. They have been stated with the aid of their supervisor and co-workers. Jimmy Sutton document criminals charged base on their statements, so their supervisor & co-workers filed fake statements?? Are you attacking different Border brokers & supervisor based on your ideals or illusions? Now you're accusing Jimmy Sutton is a Drug broker pardoned with the aid of the President Bush the place are your info? you're reaching.
2016-10-08 09:37:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, to some degree "smaller" Mexican dealers get drugs into the country. But they aren't the ones bringing in millions, billions of dollars worth of drugs. The "War on Drugs" has two faces. It keeps the local and state cops busy busting the smaller dealers, while politicians allow for Cartels to bring their loads in. What do the politicians get out of the deal? That's the power of a dollar my friend.
2006-07-27 08:57:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Izzy L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The United States should have annexed Mexico years ago. Why should Israel not attack to recover a soldier? If that soldier were my son, I would prefer him to come back alive, but if he didn't, I would surely want my governement to act. Before you ask, yes I have a son, yes he is in the Army and yes he is in Iraq. No, I do not think the Israel has gone too far.
2006-07-27 09:00:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by bkfussner 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
we have just not so you would notice.- we tried for years to force them to become completely democratic and accept our ways the same as evey other country in the americas .with out extending trade to mexico and slowly creating good jobs in mexico we have seperated the haves in america from the have nots in mexico .a couple of good border towns and some active trade and employment would of saved the divisonists from having there way .now most americans want to blame mexico for everything instead of the government who hasbeen and is proceeding to head south of the boarder in a big way in the next ten years .its the democrats turn at the helm of the ship with no one knowing the ship is on a track and no matter who is at the helm it is already going to where it was designed to and little can be done except to hold on and enjoy the ride .
AMERICA is a giant popularity contest and the winners are white good looking and can read and write .
GET use to it .
2006-07-27 09:09:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by playtoofast 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really do not see your point. Hezbollah and Al Qaeda are out to destroy Israel. What does that have to do with Mexico? Even if drug dealers kidnapped American border guards, our government would negotiate with Mexico and solve the problems. Hezbollah does NOT want to settle anything. They want ALL Jews dead, and Islam taking their place.
2006-07-27 09:02:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by ginaforu5448 5
·
0⤊
0⤋