One way to solve this is through matrices. Cramer's Rule or solving an augmented matrix with Gaussian Elimination shouldn't be too bad, if you've learned them.
Otherwise, you could use plain old algebra. Remember that when solving a system of equations, you need at least as many equations as you have variables to find a unique solution.
4x + 6y - 3z = 20
x - 5y + z = -15
-7x + y + 2z = 1
From the second equation, you have
x = 5y - z - 15
You could substitute this expression for x in the other two equations to get rid of one of the variables.
4(5y - z - 15) + 6y - 3z = 20
-7(5y - z - 15) + y + 2z = 1
(20y - 4z - 60) + 6y - 3z = 20
(-35y + 7z + 105) + y + 2z = 1
26y - 7z = 80
-34y + 9z = -104
You could multiply the top row by 9 and the bottom by 7, then add to eliminate the z's. (It's easier than multiplying the top by 17 and the bottom by 13 to eliminate the y's!)
9(26y - 7z) = 9(80)
7(-34y + 9z) = 7(-104)
234y - 63z = 720
-238y + 63z = -728
-4y = -8
y = 2.
Now that you know y, substitute it into one of the y-z equations to find z. Once you have both y and z, substitute those into one of the x-y-z equations, and you're done.
26y - 7z = 80
26(2) - 7z = 80
52 - 7z = 80
-7z = 28
z = -4.
x = 5y - z - 15
x = 5(2) - (-4) - 15
x = 10 + 4 - 15
x = -1.
Your solution is
x = -1, y = 2, and z = -4.
2006-07-27 09:07:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
4x+6y-3z = 20
x-5y+z= -15
-7x+y+2z = 1
Multiply the second equation by 4 and subtract from first eqn
4x+6y-3Z = 20
4x-20y+4z = -60
26y-7z = 80 by subtraction ..... ( 4)
Multiply the second equation by 7 and add to the third eqn
7x-35y+7z = 105
-7x+ y + 2z = 1
by adding 36y + 9z = 106 ........(5)
26y - 7z = 80 ......(6)
36y + 9z = 106 ......(7)
multiply 6 by 9 and 7 by 7
234y - 63z = 720 .....8
252y + 63z = 742 .....9
adding 8 and 9 we have
486y = 1462
y = 1462/486 = 3
26y-7z = 80
26x3 -7z = 80
7z = 78 - 80 = -2
z = -2/7
take x - 5y + z = 15
x -5x3 - 2/7 = 15
x = 15 + 15 + 2/7 = 212/7
2006-07-27 17:32:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Subhash G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
4x + 6y - 3z = 20
x - 5y + z = -15
-7x + y + 2z = 1
x - 5y + z = -15
-7x + y + 2z = 1
multiply top by -2z
-2z + 10y - 2z = 30
-7x + y + 2z = 1
-9x + 11y = 31
11y = 9x + 31
y = (9/11)x + (31/11)
4x + 6((9/11)x + (31/11)) - 3z = 20
4x + (54/11)x + (186/11) - 3z = 20
44x + 54x + 186 - 33z = 220
98x - 33z + 186 = 220
-33z = -98x + 34
z = (98/33)x - (34/33)
x - 5((9/11)x + (31/11)) + ((98/33)x - (34/33)) = -15
x - (45/11)x - (155/11) + (98/33)x - (34/33) = -15
33x - 135x - 465 + 98x - 34 = -495
-4x - 499 = -495
-4x = 4
x = -1
y = (9/11)x + (31/11)
y = (9/11)(-1) + (31/11)
y = (-9/11) + (31/11)
y = (-9 + 31)/11
y = (22/11)
y = 2
z = (98/33)x - (34/33)
z = (98/33)(-1) - (34/33)
z = (-98/33) - (34/33)
z = (-98 - 34)/33
z = (-98 + (-34))/33
z = (-132/33)
z = -4
x = -1
y = 2
z = -4
2006-07-27 13:15:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sherman81 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
multiply one of the equations by a whole number so that you have 2 eqns dat have the same coefficient for a specific variable. for instance multiply the second eqn by 4. then subtract eqn 1 and 2 so as to eliminate variable x. then u can solve those 2 eqns simultaneously. then after solving for those 2 variables just substitute them on the third and solve for the third variable.
2006-07-27 08:47:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by cuervo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
5x + 2y = 15 -5x - 2y = -5 _____________ 0 = 10 you sparkling up making use of combining words, you upload both equations. 0=10 skill this equipment of equation has no answer in any respect, because the slopes of both strains are an identical, in different words are parallel strains, so there is not any longer aspect of interception
2016-11-26 19:21:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by capua 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
u can use Cramar's rule for solving determinants
also u can use substitutions of every variable in terms of the other one but it will be too long
i suggest Cramar's rule, its more easy & never make error if u substituted the variables & constants right in every determinant
i hope u know how to do Cramar's rule
& i hope u got ur point from my explanation
2006-07-27 08:45:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kevin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
matrix method or cramer's rule
2006-07-27 08:43:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by paul van dyk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋