How can any reasonable person explain WTC7 coming down without explosives?

Question

If you don't know what I'm talking about download Loose Change.

http://www.question911.com/links.php

Or just look up pyroclastic flow in the encyclopedia and watch the towers go down.

I went back and read the popular mechanics which only mentions WT7 once and never makes any claim about how it went down. It was across the street (plenty of other buildings just as close) and collapsed at freefall speed. I'm still waiting for a real answer.

And yes Nuke Lefties people did die on that day, wouldn't you like to make sure all the killing we are doing in their name is directed at the right people.

Did anyone you know die that Day Nuke Lefties?

If name calling constituted a reasonable explanation you would be the king of rational thought.

OK dipixelator, thank you for at least trying to provide me with a rational argument, but that report doesn't give one good reason for a 47 story steal and concrete skyscraper collapsing neatly into its own footprint. They even use the term KINK in the penthouse, which is a demolition term to describe the initial building shift as the internal core structure is shattered.

WTC7 coming down like 8 times and as far as I can tell it falls straight down in a freefall. Look at it and tell me, honestly, you believe it could have been a structural failure in the atrium.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

Answer 1

Hey "Jared H":

Are you trying to trick us into telling you how it can be done without explosives, so you can collect the 1 million dollar prize offered, in the following website ?
http://www.reopen911.org/Contest.htm

Don't waste you're time trying to prove it. We have finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those building went down. I present to you some of the most recent non-refutable evidence.

1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."

2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is representative of temperatures, again beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source below, for detailed information, reguarding structural steel melting points etc.

3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by FEMA, and discarded.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.

I found the following video clips, while conducting research. They do have a bias slant, but they are also very intriguing. Once you see them, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4258946892514662399&q

Answer 2

Fire and damage from the falling for WTC buildings.

One of the WTC buildings seriously damaged WTC7 when it fell. If you have ever been there, you would seen just how close WTC7 was to WTC1 (or 2-- don't remember which was closer).

It fell after several hours (like 5p on 9/11) of burning plus I'm sure being weakened by being hit with stuff.

update-- go to link below.... I just read it... It appears to have rather plausible explanations for why it collapsed. Basically, damage and subsequent failure of columns propagated thru the structure and led to "global" failure of the building. It actually did not fall straight, it fell towards the damaged corner.

The kink was from the failure of 1 or more colunsn in the building. That caused the entire column-- up to top of building to fall down and stress the rest of the structure.

btw-- the lobby of the building was like a 5 floor atrium. I can certainly see that with some significant damage, thing would get out of kilter and fail.

Answer 3

How can any reasonable person think that WTC7 came down WITH explosives? Where it was located, it did sustain EXTENSIVE damage on one side from the other two towers collapsing. Therefore, like WTC1 and WTC2, the integrity of the building was compromised, which caused it to collapse.
Go to www.popularmechanics.com for a better explanation. Search for the story "9/11: Debunking the Conspiracy Myths".

Answer 4

I feel your pain. There are a lot of interesting facts that don't align here. Reasonable people, however, generally don't play on Yahoo forums, because they are too busy doing what reasonable people do. (except me :))

If you dont question even a little bit, then either you haven't opened up to the facts, or have a bad case of group think.

I also want to mention that Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation, which happens to belong to one of the richest families in the U.S. and that has also been redebunked (if that is a word)

Two Cents.

Answer 5

There are two thing not mentioned. One- The towers were built to withstand a 707 flying into them. So conceivably a 767 wouldn't bring them down the way they did. Second- The steel from the towers was more or less not discarded. It was recycled...to China. So any evidence is long gone!

Answer 6

The only explosion was when the planes hit the towers. After the burning and weakening of the towers then the buildings collapsed on them selves, their was not a another explosion and then a collapse.

Answer 7

It wasn't the government, it was Elvis and the space aliens being held at Area 51. You're scum. People died on that day or did you forget that?

Edit
Only juvenile lunatics don't realize that it is being directed in the right place.

Answer 8

Yo, Jared, ya gotta get a life man. Everbuddy noes it wuz Geo. Bush the Evil thet did ut!

Answer 9

oh get over it... wake up! no conspiracy here! the terrorists are responsible! Those towers were not built in the traditional manner!

Liberty Over Liberalism!

Answer 10

Dumberer and dumberer.