Should Israel have reacted differently to Hezbollah's attacks?

Answer 1

Yes, they should have done this 6 years ago instead of pulling out. To all the Hezbollah sympathizers who complain about the loss of innocent life, thank Hezbollah for hiding amongst civilians, using ambulances and UN posts as launching pads and for not letting the Lebanese people leave the areas that are being targeted. Hezbollah wants the deaths to occur so they get sympathy and recruits.

Answer 2

I cannot believe how inhuman the answers were, I cannot understand how they think, 400 are killed 45% of them were children and the others were just normal parents, who had dreams for their children, most of them were poor they just needed a roof on top of their heads, Hezbollah in not the Lebanese army, and does not live between people, why bombing the food trucks? why bomb the ambulances, if Hezbollah what they are looking for then they should fight them, not those scattered children who cannot even picked up from under their homes, the pictures are so touching, we all have children and we love them exactly like any other parent in America or Lebanon, they made their point, just stop it, no more killing.

Answer 3

Woodwinman is right.............Israel acted as they should have...They have tried to reason with Hezbollah b/4 they decided to go after them....But Hezbollah wouldn't budge,,,,,,they wouldn't even reason with Israel. So Israel did what any country should do
I would like to add that Lebanon needs to stand against Hezbollah by not letting Hezbollah call all the shots from their country.............But they would feel retalliation from Iran and Russia..

Answer 4

Hmm... modern historic past ring any bells? because did not they merely do this many years in the past? besides, i'm somewhat cynical at the same time as the merely source quoted source for the determination and numbers of those 'lengthy determination' missiles (because it really is not any longer lengthy determination, it is medium) is an IDF Brigadier favourite. that is in his interest to construct up the risk. That way at the same time as Hezbollah lob missiles into Israel (which they positively will) he's already prevalent the mandate for rolling each and each and every of how as a lot as Beirut. And apparently they could ought to invade by UN instruments; i ask your self how which could bypass down with Israel's familiar allies?

Answer 5

Yes, Israel has not been brutal enough. They need to finish off Hezbollah for good and not worry about world opinion.

Answer 6

Israel was bit hurry to steal the ssituation I suppose. They could have taken up the matter as a final warning before aacting so harshly. At least they would have recognised for the patience. Once spoiled means it will go on getting rotten. Who will be ultimate sufferers? Israel & Lebanon.....& not Hisbullah!!!

Answer 7

No they did what they know best : killed every human being they can including more than 200 children, destroyed thousands of houses with their residents, bombed the UN forces, cut water and electricity off so many towns in Lebanon and above all : succeeded in making more enemies.

Why should they have acted differently ?

Answer 8

Enough said, whatever you do reflects right back to you, the reflection to lebanon is the reaction from Israel. There should not be a war at first place this is retarded

Answer 9

Israel has a right AND duty to defend its people from terrorists. IMO I think they should hunt down every last terrorist and kill them. Thats what the terrorists want to do to Israelians and the rest of the non-Arab world!

Answer 10

No, they can't allow Hezbollah to stage in Lebanon and fire rockets at them, You think we would have allowed that to happen, even once?