English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, an Islamic Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, praises Allah, raises the knife, and charges at you. You are carrying a Glock 40, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do?

Democrat's Answer:

Well, that's not enough information to answer the question! Does the man look poor or oppressed?

Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack?

Could we run away?

What does my wife think?

What about the kids?

Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?

What does the law say about this situation?

Does the Glock have appropriate safety built into it?

Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?

Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me?

Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me?

If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me?
Should I call 9-1-1?

Why is this street so deserted?

We need to raise taxes, have paint and weed day and make this happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior.

This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some friends for few days and try to come to a consensus.

Republican's Answer:

BANG!

2006-07-27 07:48:08 · 9 answers · asked by Hippie Hunter 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Ahh and arises a liberal squalk box in the form of jps , im assumeing jps stands for Just Pull Strings since your appearently another lefty parrot , you sheeple amuse us

2006-07-27 09:21:10 · update #1

9 answers

A-fu*****-MEN! Thanks, man...I needed a good laugh....some of these people are just downright STUPID (because they choose to remain ignorant)...here's the link of one of my favorite pics....it's been around for a while, you might have already seen it...not sure how much circulation it has gotten, so here it is for any that haven't seen it...

2006-07-27 08:03:09 · answer #1 · answered by mjboog2 4 · 1 2

Republican's full answer:

BANG!

Then he steals his wallet, money, his license with his address, and siphons the gas out of his car.

Then he sends the family home and kills everyone in the terrorist's neighborhood. He accidentally kills some of their wives and children in the process, but hey, stuff happens

Then he goes after another family three towns over because he thinks there might be a connection, seeing as how they also look the same and he's been angry at them for years. Only this time he pays the kids that mow his lawn to do it for him, giving them subpar equipment to do it with. And then he stiffs the ones that make it back.

Then he calls his friends in another town and gives them guns because the same type of people are in their neighborhood, and they've been having problems too.

And the sad part is, this is exactly what the first terrorist wanted, because now he died a hero, according to his neighbors anyway.

2006-07-27 08:14:41 · answer #2 · answered by jps245 2 · 0 0

Actually pop him in the knees and as he is sprawled out on the side walk, take your time and use the other 12 rounds in the clip in a progressive manner that tells this rag head how much you want to send him on to his 72 virgins--one in each elbow, then the wrists, the nuts, the ankles, etc. and the last two into the stomach and liver, so he will bleed out before rescue.

2006-07-27 07:54:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can not support however realize you do not specify the "loopholes" you're speaking approximately. By definition, a crook, no less than one that has a prison list, could not legally own a firearm besides. Last time I checked although, criminals do not honestly have a tendency to obey legislation, thus their monicker. I'll anticipate you imply the "gun exhibit loophole" so wildly proclaimed via the anti-gun crowd. This "loophole" is not anything greater than the sale of firearms among individual residents who attend gun indicates. People who desire to promote a gun take them to those indicates due to the fact (shock) there are men and women there who would desire to shop for them. It is an same transaction to promoting a gun by way of a categorized advert, handiest you simply cross to wherein there maybe purchasers. Anyone who purchases a gun from a trader at a gun exhibit has to go by way of the historical past tests. Sales among individual residents aren't (and will have to now not be) blanketed via the ones legislation.

2016-08-28 16:58:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes, your right. Take him off the count. And if he should get 72 virgins up there I hope he also discovers that for eternity his virgins will remain just that. Virgins!!.

2006-07-27 08:01:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not entirely accurate:

Republican's answer:
Bang! Bang! Bang! How was my grouping?

2006-07-27 07:58:22 · answer #6 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 0 0

Yep, Bang that just about says it for me.

2006-07-27 07:52:06 · answer #7 · answered by alwaysbombed 5 · 0 0

Are you Ted Nugent?

2006-07-27 07:52:14 · answer #8 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 0 0

bang bang bang bang bang bang,
reload
continue until done!

2006-07-27 07:51:54 · answer #9 · answered by digital genius 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers