Do you think politicians should ( or must) be tested medically and psychologically before they take charge ?

Answer 1

yes i think that would be a good step to bringing the governments by to order with sufficient leaders.

Answer 2

No, because a politician might have a psychological disorder but is able to keep it under control with therapy and/or medication. But if he/she was tested, it might show up and then they would have to deal with the stigma that comes with mental disorders. Also, having a medical or psychological problem doesn't always make a person less capable of their job.

Answer 3

Do you think citizens should (or must) be tested medically and psychologically before they are allowed to vote?

Or, how about a plain ol' civics test to weed out the morons and nincompoops among voters?

Answer 4

Yes, and I wish Clinton would have released his medical records the way Bush did.
Maybe we should also test the idiots that vote.

Answer 5

Need to find a medicine for PLCS( politicians losing common sense).A disease where politians lose all sense of reality and common sense (day by day) the longer their in office.

Answer 6

No, we should get what we vote for...good or bad. If we vote in someone that is in poor health, medically or mentally, then we should accept the consequences of our actions.

Answer 7

I dont think there party would let them run if they werent excactly like the average american. And no, that isnt a stab at anybody.

Answer 8

is the pope a catholic. do you want another hitler insident? who gives a **** if can't take responsibility for our actions for votting a nut case in, everyone makes mistakes, i demand a saftey net

Answer 9

And often throughout their term of office.

Answer 10

I think potential voters should be tested!