English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or would they just say if we get attacked again it's our own fault.

2006-07-27 06:10:59 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

hey hich, you might be tired of this crap but Bill Clinton had 8 years of papers saying we would be attacked. USS Cole, 1st World Trade Center bombing,etc. All he cared about was his next ******* from a fat intern.

2006-07-27 06:22:17 · update #1

HaHa, love these liberals answers.

2006-07-27 06:26:15 · update #2

hnda96, ask Bill Clinton if he remembers Bin Laden, he said he was the biggest threat to the country but let him go THREE times!

2006-07-27 06:31:54 · update #3

31 answers

We would have all the Neocons sign up for war duty, and free up some College cash to pay your taxes with. Have the Neocons line up on the American boarders and keep illegal immigrants out, and terrorist, since you are so good about preaching we are protecting you....You don't get any weapons either because you can't be trusted, just use your mace and get your hands dirty.

2006-07-27 06:20:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This pretty much sums it up....

"Are you a Democrat, Republican or Southern Republican? What with elections coming up, perhaps this could assist you in determining which way to vote:

Question: How do you tell the difference between Democrats, Republicans and Southern Republicans?
The answer can be found by posing the following question:

You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock .40, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.
What do you do?


Democrat's Answer

Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!
Does the man look poor or Oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack? Could we run away? What does my wife think? What about the kids? Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand? What does the law say about this situation? Does the Glock have appropriate safety built into it? Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children? Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me? Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me? If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me? Should I call 9-1-1? Why is this street so deserted? We need to raise taxes, have a paint and weed day and make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior.

This is all so confusing!

I need to debate this with some friends for a few days and try to come to a consensus.


Republican's Answer

BANG!

Southern Republican's Answer

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
*click*"

2006-07-27 13:19:14 · answer #2 · answered by freedom_isnt_free1 2 · 0 0

Has anyone actually answered the question yet?

I don't think so. A matter of fact I see fantasy girl has given a fantasy answer. Bush had security bulletins given to him "everyday" that stated that Bin Laden was going to fly airplanes into a building. Wow! Missed that but that is because that didn't happen. Then a second paragraph that is so filled with inaccurasies it is sadly laughable. To be so nieve, especially as the world of terrorists has been so vividly thrown back in the spotlight in Israel again, that terrorism is not done by one man and it is not something new or created in the last few years, is hideous.

To have the same people who claim that 9/11 was created and/or caused by the US to then point to the 9/11 commission as their bible is a riot. Of course, they have read the 9/11 commission as well as they read the bible so I guess it is fitting.

2006-07-27 13:28:28 · answer #3 · answered by Donut44 3 · 0 0

Well the first thing I would do is bring every last one of our soldiers home, then I would close our borders to every body. Then stay 100% out of world affairs, just let them kill each other. and since were not spending all that money fighting wars based on lies, and keeping all the overseas bases open I would take that extra money and use it to build the best defense system in the world, that way everyone else would think twice about attacking us! and the U.S. would be a virtual fortress that would be impenetrable by an invading or attacking force.

2006-07-27 14:40:37 · answer #4 · answered by The Prez. 4 · 0 0

To best answer that question I would have to refer to the 911 commission when questioning Bush's cabinet members about 9/11. They were all asked repeatidly why nothing was done against Bin Laden prior to 9/11 and since Clinton was in office. Apparently since Bush took office all covert activities to thwart and halt Bin Laden ceased. So the commission wanted to know why these programs were not continued and why the presidential security bulletin given to him everyday that stated Bin Laden plans to hijack planes to fly into buildings was not heeded. There were no response to these questions. Matter of fact Rice's answer was very dumb. She said the security bulletin was too vague. She said it said something about Bin Laden flying planes into buildings. The commission was insulted by her act of ignorance.

So would Gore have prevented 9/11 who knows. Maybe he would have paid attention to the security bulletins. Maybe he would have gave the order to kill Bin Laden when the drone plane found him the summer of 2001 when Bush refused. Who knows. I do feel he would have concentrated his efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan to find Bin Laden, the man that did attack us. Instead of attacking Iraq that had nothing to do with 9/11 and destabilizing the entire middle east region. To quote Clinton when Bush took over as president and Clinton made his final words of advice to Bush; "The concerns are Bin Laden and North Korea and Iraq is not an issue."

So draw your own conclusions.

2006-07-27 13:31:49 · answer #5 · answered by Fantasy Girl 3 · 0 0

simple we would first need to end all military weapons building and with draw all our troops home --close every embessey in the world and have all americans who wish to return home ahead of the troops .after 30 days all those americans abroad are on there own .NOW we have all the troops home and the coast guard patroling vigerously to prevent any foriegn ships from coming here without approval from our allies .all the money in our banks from foriegn investors and countrys becomes ours .we simply tell them we have closed shop and america was taken over by the liberals and all deals are off .then we talk to our neighbors the mexicans about oil and tell south america we are sorry for all the trouble in the past and lets work as a continent for the good of all people .while we are busy in north and south america builkding a better continent with prosperity for all we will be to busy to notice the rest of the world and let them deal with there own problems .YOU now will ask what about terrorists .WELL i liberaly support the use of nukes on the rest of the world at this point and refuse to back down one bomb goes of here and the middle east is gone just that simple they are across the ocean and any americans who can not find fufillment among the lands of north and south america deserves what they get for leaving a safe and protected continent .FIRST we must beg our neighbors for forgiveness and adopt a more enlightened view of what freedom means to all of us and not the judao christian crap .BUT a spiritual one in which all people have freedom to be happy and free fro mgovernment controls on personel choices .

2006-07-27 13:42:03 · answer #6 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0 0

If a liberal was in power then the US wouldn't be THE No1 most hated country on the planet and therefore wouldn't have got attacked in the first place!
You can thank your war mongering Republican **** President for any future attacks cos they'll be on his head.

Grow a brain will you! All your beloved Bush is doing now is ensuring more terrorist attacks! If you can't see that then you truly are a Republican.

2006-07-27 13:16:35 · answer #7 · answered by Bapboy 4 · 0 0

I don't understand the liberal perspective. Why would you want the Iraqi people to suffer any longer under Saddam's rule? Don't you want to help people? Keep in mind that this is the same person who assinated his own cabinet leaders when he took over as president and executed 140 Shiites because he thought they were ALL in a plot to kill him. What about the thousands of Kurds that he used chemical weapons on? ....his own people. Is this the kind of world you want to live in? That man should not be leading a country, I know and don't care what excuses we had to make up to get soldiers over there and bring him down. It made the world just a little less evil.
As for a liberal president protecting us, lets go back one president......Who opened up trading with China? Who gave them #1 trading status? Who gave them supercomputers that gave them the technology to MIRV their missles? BILL CLINTON...that's who. And in turn, who is the greatest threat to our country? CHINA.

You mentioned FDR and JFK, how dare you put their names in the same line with Al Gore. Those two presidents had balls and let the world know it. What if after Pearl Harbor we just attacked Japan? They were the only ones who hurt us right? Germany had nothing to do with it....let the rest of the world deal with them. Abandon our european brothers to fight their fight without us and Adolf Hitler's successor would be signing alliance treaties with Kim Jong il today. Same situation, we used an act of violence to give us an excuse to help the rest of the world.

2006-07-27 14:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by Josh 2 · 0 0

Perhaps we would read the piece of paper that says YOU ARE GOING TO BE ATTACKED, and do something about it. I'm so tired of this crap. If you think that Bush did a great job preventing the 9/11 attacks, you haven't read the NON PARTISAN 9/11 commission report. If you think he hasn't created MORE terrorists, than you aren't using your brain. Get ready, we're coming to take our country BACK!

2006-07-27 13:15:39 · answer #9 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0 0

We would focus on actually trying to combat the real terrorists who are in charge of 9/11.. AKA Osama Bin Laden, in Afghanastan. Unlike you Republicans who forget about Osama, the man who planned the 9/11 attacks killing thousands of Americans. Oh nooo, instead you want t start some stupid war to "combat terrorism" yet terrorism is on the INCREASE in Iraq, not the decrease. The ppl are sick of America in there and joining al qidea.

2006-07-27 13:37:36 · answer #10 · answered by Jacques 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers