2006-07-27 05:56:45 · 25 answers · asked by ohwiseone 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You see, O J Simpson allegedly killed his ex wife and his trial was on television everyday ! and so was Michael Jackson's alleged molestation of young boys ! You could not escape them.
There has been ZERO coverage of Saddam's trial on British TV , the boogie man of all time, is having a trial and the media is not interested !! ??
We are not meant to know , what he has got to say, what dirty laundry is he hanging out ( or whose ).
The powers that be, will make sure , he takes his secrets to the grave.
If there ever be a trial for GW, all he has to say is " I do not recall such things" !! after all it worked for Reagan !
I wonder if Yanks know what LIBERAL means ? ! Look it up idiots ! before you label anyone ! ......Children ....
2006-07-27 06:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
One is the chief of his united states of america yet no longer chosen democratically who has accredited the unprovoked invasion of a sovereign territory, condoned Human Rights abuses, the detention of human beings without trial and using torture. He has a constrained hold close on the English language and is a non secular bigot. the different became the single time chief of Iraq...
2016-12-10 16:39:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see we got the expected answer from leogirl. No is the answer about keeping Hussain alive abut so is the answer for Blair and Bush.
2006-07-27 06:53:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never mind a trial.....it would only need Tony Blair to do a remake of the film ''The Good The Bad and The Ugly''. Don't ask me who's who??
2006-07-27 06:13:36 · answer #4 · answered by reggie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, you are so silly. Such hyperbole is so cute. Now can you learn how to add and subtract like a big boy?
I love it when these people are so young and cute. But you know what happens when people like this grow up. They stay stupid and work for unions.
b
2006-07-27 06:07:52 · answer #5 · answered by Bacchus 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is idiotic, you must be really uneducated. Sadam tried to kill a whole race, GWB is trying to run a country, something that you couldnt do.
2006-07-27 06:00:54 · answer #6 · answered by FitzBaker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he should be stoned to death by the people he hurt for so many years. They should tear his fingernails and toenails off one by one and he should have all his hairs plucked out of his head one by one!!! There is no amount of suffering he could do that would ever be repayment for what he has done in the past!!!
2006-07-27 06:00:00 · answer #7 · answered by rockinout 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm I didn't know Bush was going on trial. Do you know something that i don't?....in case you didn't catch that, I was being sarcastic. Now stop asking stupid questions.
2006-07-27 06:01:32 · answer #8 · answered by Mags 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what a good question !
or maybe they should keep him alive in case they decide he was doing a much better job in the first place
2006-07-27 06:00:07 · answer #9 · answered by speed777 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why not but not to trial bush,
saddam is a useful thing for usa, he is the man who provided oppurtunity to USA to enter his forces to arab world, he is the agent of CIA
2006-07-27 06:19:36 · answer #10 · answered by sara85blue 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋