English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

using molloy and company look at the ways in which the term 'nothing to express' can be applied. does 'nothing to express' mean the same as expressing nothing? examples fromtext. other references, eg quotes and examples from academics.

2006-07-27 04:35:35 · 6 answers · asked by karrie w 1 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

6 answers

No academic references but I can tell you what I feel as someone who loves his work: Beckett was to drama what Picasso was to art - he strips away all artifice, leaves only an essence and invites you to contemplate this, the epic struggle of existence, without the certainty of right or wrong, left or right, even up or down. Nothing. No perspective, but beauty and terror in one wheezing breath. Or...
Look at one of those famous photographs of Beckett as an older man... and look into the eyes.

2006-07-28 03:58:39 · answer #1 · answered by Tyler's Mate 4 · 0 0

As each and every white guy in those days (the days of Brigham youthful), they have been racist via as we communicate's known, however additionally they have been abolitionists and "*****-fanatics" via the factors of their time. They tried to make experience of their international with the help that they had, inclusive of the biases that they had discovered from their protestant history. And bear in mind, interior the cases those issues have been reported and written, ***** exchange into no longer a foul be conscious. It exchange right into a denominator used via anybody. This introduced approximately the so referred to as "priesthood ban". And returned the subsequent era tried to make experience with the flaws that they had. this is like a puzzle: you have some expertise, you have some revelation, and you attempt to make an entire photograph out of it devoid of understanding the finished photograph in strengthen. each and each time a clean piece comes into the proper place, the photograph gets clearer, and a few aspects of the photograph you imagined could be tossed out, because of the fact they're incorrect. Likewise here, while the hot revelation got here that ended the priesthood ban, previous "truths" had to be tossed out. as a result between the apostles reported: "overlook something I or all and varied else reported (with regard to the priesthood ban and regarding black human beings of African descent) beforehand of this revelation: We did no longer have the certainty now we've."

2016-11-03 02:51:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Beckett was a zero, a stupid little boy who never grew up. Lucky for him, a decadent and childish clique took over the Literary Establishment and offered him a place in their vacuum. So Beckett got even with the living world by imposing his zombie art on it. With his usual pompous nonsense, he means that there is too much intelligence, meaning, and life in the world and it has to be smothered with the anti-matter that oozes from his feeble, whining mind.

2006-07-27 07:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This simply means that he has nothing to comment.Indeed,he is one of the most famous writers of absurdity, and to commnt on absurdity would only complicate things.

2006-07-27 07:48:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am so not doing your homework for you.

2006-07-27 05:56:49 · answer #5 · answered by felineroche 5 · 0 0

????????????????????

2006-07-27 04:37:15 · answer #6 · answered by IrishLassie 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers