If marriage is between one man and one woman, shouldn't all married people have to be chomisome tested?

Question

If you look at my profile you will see that I am neither male nor female. Oh I look like a dude, but with my regular hormones levels (I don't take Testosterone) I'd look like a dude iin a dress too. How does this law effect those like me? Do I have to marry a man to file as married. If that wouldn't be a gay marriage nothing would. And if it's gender that we are going to base a right on shouldn't there be a chromisome test done to make sure that bug straping girlfriend of farmer john's is really about to be a wife and not a husband? How closely should we look?

two aditional points

1.This question was placed in politcs and government, not in religeon. There is a seperation of church and state in the US that is the law reguarding goverment and politics.

2. I and was not created by God alone. man (a doctor) stuck his big wise shoe in the door when he gave my mother Progestin which introduced androgines to my system at a crucial part of my developement and when I came out looking like a mixxed gender the cut off my dangly bit to make me look more female.

Answer 1

I have another interesting point...if the "people" want so badly to base this marriage thing on procreation, what about the heterosexual couples who CHOOSE to remain childless? Should their marriages be invalidated? And single women and men who do not want to procreate? Should they be prevented from marrying as well? I think they would soon start singing a whole damned different tune if it was THEIR rights being stripped away a little at a time.

Answer 2

As a conservative Christian theologian, this is one area of ethics that I'm struggling to answer well. On the one hand the Bible clearly states that marriage has always been intended by God to be a unique union between a man and his wife. The Bible also clearly condemns homosexuality. Anyone who suggests otherwise is simply twisting what the Bible says to make it say the opposite.

So, where does that leave someone whose gender is undetermined for physical reasons? Based on what's already clear from scripture, I believe I have two choices. First, androgynous people should remain unmarried. God calls many to be single for ministry purposes. Since your creation was not a mistake, then perhaps you should conduct your life like anyone else God has called to be single. The second choice would be to suppose that even though some people's bodies lean toward neither gender, they do indeed belong to one gender or the other, and determining one's true gender is a matter of prayer. If the latter were correct, and the person chose a gender based on personal revelation from God (directly or indirectly), then that person would be free to marry the corresponding gender without suspicion that anything homosexual had occurred.

That's just some initial thoughts. I'll keep working on this area of study. I'd be interested to know what you think.

Answer 3

I think any person should be able to marry any person they wish to, as long as the other person wants that to. It is silly really that I can`t marry (legally) another man you know why, it is because if I have a sex change operation I am then legally a woman and then can marry a man. Don`t any of you get it I am still the same person , I would just have the female parts (that don`t really work anyway). so why is it such a big deal? It is because of what other people perceive the world really to be like if I look like a woman but was born a man it is fine for me to marry another man. But if I stay the way I am then it is an abomination that is the most retard thing Iv`e ever herd of. If people would just change the way they think about how they perceive reality to be then none of this would be an issue.

Answer 4

What percentage of the population consists in individuals born without a distinct gender? In the scheme of the marriage issue, your question is really a red herring. Of course, laws may not be able to address perfectly every conceivable situation; nonetheless laws may provide essential principles for the shape of society. The real issue in the marriage debate is not whether homosexuals have a "right" to get married. The real question is whether American society chooses to have the basic unit of society be the individual or the family. Feminists seek to break down society so that the basic unit in society is the individual; conservatives want the basic unit in society to be the family. Defining marriage has a direct bearing on whether society operates on the basis of the family-unit or the individual-unit. It is interesting to note that the most liberal societies in the world on the issue of marriage (Scandinavia and some other European countries) are also societies that are going to be ethnically extinct in a few decades for lack of regeneration--perhaps societies built on the basis of the individual are not sustainable. The question you should really be asking is whether you prefer a society that values the family as its basic unit or a society based on the assertion of the individual over everything else.

Answer 5

Yeah.. ignore approximately consent or no longer.. any intercourse with a guy's wallet is wallet rape and isn't any longer condoned via Tha Brovvahood... discover ways to worship on the altar of the Holy wallet, and the everlasting Cashflow..... and enable no lady ever take great component approximately you.... BQ:- Do you sense a undeniable connection between your wallet and the Universe?

Answer 6

You are a very special case, I can't advise you because I'm not qualified..... I think if you look and feel like a dude, and you like women, just trry to be yourself, as hard as that may be. Probably be best if you lived in California, where a situation like yours could be considered almost normal. Sorry if I offend in any ways.

Answer 7

In some states, judges have decided that gender is a matter of chromosomes, not external appearance.

Answer 8

Very interesting. That is why they should just allow gay marriages. They are not hurting anybody. I see no point in not allowing them to get married, that way we don't have to do chromosome testing.

Answer 9

Or maybe our pidgeon-holed definitions of "man" and "woman" are too restricting for the biological and social variety that actually exists.

Answer 10

You really need counselling. Try and find a local church to help.