Whatever happened to marriage vows? Doesn't Yahoo encourage the joy of marriage? Why would they smugly present that option to 'on the fence' spouses who are looking for assurance to seek 'elsewhere' than their marriage? Does this really piss you off? Think, YOUR spouse, could be under an id that has the label 'married but looking' and talking to some perverted member of the opposite sex about meeting at a motel for kinky sex!
I'm upset! and I dig it!
2006-07-27 04:28:20 · 10 answers · asked by cpt_the_pooh 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
It's called swinging in the non cheater terms. Not realy a problem if both parties are willing. The spouse on the other hand may not be "down" with such.
2006-07-27 04:33:01 · answer #1 · answered by Thomas S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is kinda shocking, but then again, it's not yahoo's job to save anyone's marriage and to perform a moral revolution of society. If married people wanna look, they could lie and say they're single, but that would be unfair to the person who may get involved with them, you understand? It's better for the other person to know what they're getting into.
I respect this institution and I wouldn't want my husband fooling around, but I am not responsible for someone else's marriage.
2006-07-27 11:34:28 · answer #2 · answered by Foxy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey hun....i agree with you..i was 17 and pregnant when i got married and here were are 5yr later still together and making a family...the way is see it (at any age) if your not %100 sure you can hold down a marriage then don't walk down the isle.....wedding vows are one of the most important things you will ever speak because that is a promise to GOD....it's sad and a shame that people have forgotten the true meaning behind them....im glad to see you and most of the other people that have answered still hold them sacred....love daisy
2006-07-27 11:51:42 · answer #3 · answered by crazy_daisy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is shocking. I was not aware that such an option was available. And although Yahoo! is not responsible for keeping folks marriages together they wouldn't have added the option if there wasn't a demand for it. That's what is really scary to me.
2006-07-27 11:43:44 · answer #4 · answered by braverun 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look, obviously there are tons of people out there who are married and looking or the option wouldn't be there. At least it gives people the chance to be honest and to know what they are getting into....Yahoo! is just making sure all resources are there. It's the stupid f*&%ers that use it that p*ss me off.
2006-07-27 11:41:17 · answer #5 · answered by Belle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say better to know that someone was married and looking from the get go then to find out later.
2006-07-27 11:35:11 · answer #6 · answered by tied2tots 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't be mad at Yahoo... they are first and foremost a business. All they want to do is make money - and they're good at it. They couldn't care less about some guy cheating on his wife.
2006-07-27 11:33:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am with you, they should not have that available....it is like that everywhere now. So you know they are looking for if they are married....just pure sex!
2006-07-27 11:32:36 · answer #8 · answered by Virginia Gal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its quite upsetting....wat happended to marriage vows people?
and some folks actually indicate that they belong to this category...crazy....the world's gone crazy! i think yahoo.com should erase that sorta thing.
2006-07-27 12:04:27 · answer #9 · answered by witandsass 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i had no idea! that's horrible, and i totally agree with you. what's with people these days? i don't understand it...
2006-07-27 11:32:50 · answer #10 · answered by cervy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋