Look at history. If we did not have liberals, we would still be living in the dark ages. It is liberal (open to new ideas) policies that have advanced civilizations. If we always stay with the status quo, we would not have advanced to where we are today.
In America, liberals got women the right to vote, ended slavery, changed medicine for the better, set up our free press, ended child labor, created safer work places and highway safety, created environmental policies, created free schools for all. The list could go on and on.
Let's admit we are all liberal and realize the fallacy of "the good old days" was just that. A fallacy.
Life expectancy has never been longer. Crime rates have never been lower. Our middle class, while now paying a larger percentage of taxes then ever before, has never been larger.
Blaming liberals for our nations faults is our way of not taking responsibility for our own actions.
2006-07-27
04:19:37
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Steve R
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
When you answer, could you please do a few things. First, don't be abusive to me. I am trying to have an intelligent debate. Second, check your work. Mistakes only make you look silly. If you want to prove yourself, think things through and go back to read what you have written before you post it.
My premise is that the definition of "liberal" is "favoring progress or reform". How can anyone be opposed to that?
2006-07-27
04:34:42 ·
update #1
I'm with you in principle, but I think your method of getting your point across is slightly flawed. You cannot just attack the term conservative as both the terms conservative AND liberal are 2 sides to a coin that are supposed to represent what is the best interest of the public. They both have some very noble principles at their core.
What is most aggrevating is that the conservative vs. liberal debate is mute because the people that we elect are neither conservative nor liberal. As of right now I think they are far closer to Authoritarian. This is not left vs. right, republican vs. democrat, or liberal vs. conservative. Corporate controlled media has managed to convince people that this is the debate, but the real debate should be the interests of the 2% of people that own 95% of everything vs. the rest of us. Republicans AND Democrats are sellouts and have been for the last century.
It works like this.
1 You get money for your election from corporate sponsers.
2 When you win election those same corporate sponsers take on the boring task of writing legislation you were elected to write.
3 You get more money to run campaigns for bigger offices or the same office, if you win go back to step 2, if you lose go on to step 4
4 You are rewarded after the people see you for the fraud you are by being hired by the corporations you most helped as a lobbyist, thus helping someone else in steps 1-3.
From an intellectual standpoint its pure genius, from a moral one it is utterly reprehensible.
2006-07-27 05:00:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jared H 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh you are so so wrong. Women conservative and otherwise got themselves the right to vote. Slavery was ended by Republicans. That's a fact, look it up. How did it change medicine for the better? The free press was established by our forefathers. They would abhor was a liberal believes in today. So your saying the crime rates are lower during President Bushes Administration? hmm?? Yes the middle class IS paying more taxes, why you ask? Because of all the damn inept inefficient social programs that are supporting the not just the few who actually need it, but every tom dick and lazy butt out there along with millions of illegals. That is why. You caused the taxes to go up.
2006-07-27 04:27:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly, lessee. a million#- i'm professional decision. i'm a guy, so i have not had an abortion. My spouse miscarried, and that sucked. yet I nonetheless imagine that determination is as a lot because the lady, her physician and HER beliefs. #2- i imagine you need to possess each and each and every of the guns you choose. I also imagine guns must have a identify so in the adventure that they are used in a criminal offense, the possession of the gun ought to correctly be traced lower back to the way it were given into the palms of a criminal. i do not hunt, yet venison is okay. I grew up on a Dairy farm and characteristic butchered better cows than you've probable eaten. #3- i'm an Atheist. For my own motives. and that i'm probable better moral than you, as i do not randomly accuse and choose human beings on little or no ideas. #4- Spelling is sturdy. It helps positioned across your message obviously. what's incorrect with that? #5- i'm on medicine for melancholy. SO.... i wager my opinon of myself ought to apply some artwork. concept i attempt to apply good judgment and reason over knee jerk reactions. #6- See #5. My little lady is on no meds. How do we've intense reviews of ourselves if we are depressed? it really is extremely an contridiction. #7-Yep. after I die, it will be plenty like how I remember it previously i develop into born. i'm no longer planning on any omnipotent powers. #8-i do not trust i have used any foul language and characteristic tried to apply impecable deductive reasoning. #9- See #2. Dairy farm. Meat is yummy. thanks for the quiz. Lemme recognize in case you ever have a question. Have a impressive day.
2016-11-26 02:41:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals change with time.
Classical liberals place a particular emphasis on the sovereignty of the individual, with private property rights being seen as essential to individual liberty.
To day it is for Socialism This is what Liberals want Socialism refers to a broad array of doctrines or political movements that envisage a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to social control. As an economic system, socialism is usually associated with state or collective ownership of the means of production.
If you still do not thnik so look at what the dems want to do and who votes for them.
2006-07-27 04:35:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly! You are so damn right it wont quit!
True.People like Matt have a lot of self-loathing,which they take out on others.They react negatively to what they cant have,thus the term reactionary.Like Rush Limbaugh hating Clinton because he had both women AND the presidency.Reactioanries are a sorry lot.
Plent of "liberals" of all stripes have brains and great minds,thanks.
2006-07-27 04:30:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So you have checked the political background of all people who have had new ideas? I bet that took some research!! Can I see the results of your research that ONLY liberals have progressed this country or even the world? That would be some interesting reading for sure.
2006-07-27 04:26:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by MadAxe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't forget selective memory and taking credit for all that's right in the wolrd and none of the responsibility for whats wrong !
France went Liberal , big time , look at them !
20% unemployment , waiting lines for health care , rampant crime , $8.00 gasoline and HUGE TAXES on those who will work .
2006-07-27 04:43:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am liberal. I pay taxes. I absolutely understand why people who work hard would be against welfare and believe that promoting the success of commerce will allow everyone to prosper by the trickle down effect. I understand when/why people have strong beliefs in propriety, religion and believe that others would succeed if only they thought just like them.
2006-07-27 04:29:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by xamayca.com 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they have a brain. that's why there not liberal, wow jim dont act like you know my type, i have no self loathing, i am a very happy go lucky person except when people make stupid comments like how can you not be a liberal
sorry steve if your only point is that change is good, then i disagree with you there. not everything needs to be changed not everthing needs to be fixed.
2006-07-27 04:22:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by matt S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read your history again. After you grow past 18 you will realize what a stupid outlook you have. Ah, the bliss of youth.
2006-07-27 04:23:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋