English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since roughly half the human population is female, it is fare to say, about half of all abortions are killing girls. Thus, doesn't this actually contradict "women's rights" ? Isn't "abortion rights for women" an oxymoron?

What is worse, men oppressing women, or women, (who claim to stand for women's rights) oppressing young girls?

2006-07-27 04:10:52 · 21 answers · asked by man_id_unknown 4 in Social Science Gender Studies

21 answers

Very true, Sir. Pro-Choicers and Feminists who claim they care for women and are killing unborn girls are nothing but heartless hypocrites. They are only showing that they do not care about all women, just themselves.

I do not understand how they can even look themselves in the mirror without shame. All women should be insulted by their treacherous ways, and murderous lifestyle.

2006-07-28 05:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by man_never_known 2 · 4 13

Fact: Every woman that gets an abortion is not
unmarried nor on welfare

Fact: Some married women are abused by their
husbands, some girls by their brothers,
uncles and in some cases, fathers or
stepfather's, mother's boyfriend, etc...

Fact: If Gods will is for a child to be born, there
is nothing ANYONE can do to stop it,
including the abortionist. (Remember
Moses? Jesus?)

Fact: Some women, (mainly young,uneducated
girls, use abortion as a means of birth
control.


Given the fact that some women use abortion as birth control, which it is not, is actually the main reasoning behind prolife. This is not the issue in every case. It violates the abused rape victims, those wives that can't just "keep their legs closed"because of their abusive husbands, and those women who are abused by family members or guests. Being forced to bear a child to constantly be reminded of their real life horror story, after already having been abused, is horrific. Those people trying to say that all woman getting abortions are murderers are crazy. Because the majority of these people had NO CHOICE in being in their situation. But then again, prolifers must have not gone through the same experiences, and therefore it's easier to have supremist opinions because you must have made better choices in husbands, boyfriends, families, and jobs.
How many people have you helped in your own lifetimes? If you're prolife, why not be PRO LIVING? What about those that are already living or trying to? Until you people are ready to help someone in need before they are faced with a desperate choice of abortion, you have nothing to say now. And saying nothing about the living, Prolifers, makes you phonies.

2006-07-27 17:14:10 · answer #2 · answered by classyjazzcreations 5 · 0 0

Something this controversial isn't easy to say. I am a pro-choice person because I believe every person has a right to say what happens to their own body. I also believe that a fetus isn't alive until it starts moving. You have people with horrible pregnacies that just can't have babies and almost die, and you have girls who are raped by even their own family members. You think it is right for someone to say you can't do what is right for that person.
You have the right to decide which school to attend, car to drive, house to live in without anyone saying it is wrong so you pro-life people think about this. The next time you make love to your partner did someone tell you you couldn't have sex on a certain day. That is kind of what you are saying when you take a womans choice to do with her body what she pleases and makes sense to her.

There isn't anything on the books considering what is the beginning of life. I have also heard that prolife people will not let their daughters go on birth control because if they play they should pay. Want an oxy-moron there you go. We have ways of preventing pregnancy and parents won't help their children not get pregnant. I have heard and read some of your stuff time for you to get off your pedestool and realize that you have 14 year old girls having babies. How wrong is that?

2006-07-27 04:21:23 · answer #3 · answered by Nitengale 2 · 0 0

More than half the population are female.
And, no. That is not in the least ironic. Nor is 'abortion rights for women' an oxymoron.

2006-07-27 22:24:20 · answer #4 · answered by R.I.P. 4 · 0 0

By this logic, there should be funerals for every miscarriage, no matter how early. And, every woman's period should be checked for a "body", because we wouldn't want to not bury the dead.

Or maybe you do that?

But, I somewhat agree that in a perfect world, women shouldn't have to make the difficult, difficult decision to abort. There should be FOOLPROOF contraception and when, in the very, very rare instance that would fail, the baby of tragedy or accident should be celebrated and the mom and baby should be supported for life by the welfare system and they MUST live at least at one demographic income level above any former abortion protester on record. I know you'd want that.

2006-07-27 04:19:36 · answer #5 · answered by oldsoul 3 · 0 0

I doubt they actually consider gender in their support of pro-choice. Being pro-choice doesn't mean you are pro-abortion. I don't believe in abortion (excluding extenuating circumstances) but I also don't believe I have the right to tell some other woman what to do with her body. I would rather her abort than to raise an unwanted child... and screw that whole adoption idea. If you ever get the chance to read the book Freakonomics... there is an awesome section in their about crime rate and how it was related to abortion in the 90's... it will open your mind!

2006-07-27 04:27:11 · answer #6 · answered by MadMaxx 5 · 0 0

No it is not ironic. The way you phrased the question presupposes part of the possible answers.
I challenge you to read up on over population and it's psychological, sociological, and environmental effects then come to a answer that will answer the problem's it causes that does not include abortion as part the answer.
Our society is decaying from effects that are identical to over population effects, and note that over population studies conclusion are VERY nasty and always include the death of the majority or all the subjects.
PS. ( as far as I know at the moment.)

2006-07-27 04:48:19 · answer #7 · answered by Alan G 3 · 0 0

i dont think you can make generalisations about women who chose to have an abortion. The majority of women who chose to have an abortion have no other option. It is not something that anyone would chose to do willingly. Unfortunately, for various reasons, women get pregnant when they shouldnt - people make mistakes. I think there needs to be more understanding of women who get into that situation and there needs to be a lot more sex education and open-ness so that women really do have more of a choice.

2006-07-27 04:30:32 · answer #8 · answered by starshaped5 1 · 0 0

professional-abortion advocates certainly comprehend that we've no interest in what a woman does along with her very own physique. the subject stems from this fact: To be a real professional-abortion recommend is to hold that the ease of the pregnant female is greater considerable than the life that's being taken. there is no solid protection of that place although, so smokescreen arguments would desire to be shaped. Even some human beings of religion attempt to have justifications for it by using arguing that the soul isn't imparted yet - although the bible says that God knew us in the previous we've been shaped. He knew me because of fact the initiating of time, no longer "after the 2d trimester". The "i can take you out because of fact I further you in..." protection additionally must enlarge to mothers who drown their infants. no one (yet) thinks it is okay. I wish human beings would seem at the two real motives abortion is criminal in this united states of america (and observe that Obama needs all of it he can get). a million - So married men can cheat on their better halves with teenage women and the girls can get abortions without planned Parenthood reporting statutory rape (which by using regulation, they'd desire to rfile - yet do no longer) 2 - to limit the style of Black and different minorities born in this united states of america. See the place planned Parenthood places up their abortion clinics and to which inhabitants of ladies they industry.

2016-12-10 16:37:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow, clever play on words. Not a valid argument though. Please stay out of politics. A fetus is not a woman. And nor are you. My uterus is not your concern. You will never experience a point in your life where you will have to make that choice. It is the Pro-Choicer's job to make sure the choice is always there for women that want it.

2006-07-27 05:15:20 · answer #10 · answered by Lisa H 4 · 0 0

Pro choice pro life. I don't think that what a women wants do to with her body is political issue at all. It is no ones business except for the women and/or her partner. Doesn't the government and eveyone else something else to do beside worry about what a women is doing with her body.

2006-07-27 04:16:02 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers