2006-07-27 02:01:48 · 9 answers · asked by dmb 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I believe the people that do care more about the trees feel that an unborn child is not alive. It is very sad to think that something as innocent and defenseless as an unborn child can be just thrown away while some people will protect trees with their lives.
2006-07-27 02:09:13 · answer #1 · answered by waiting4u2believe 1 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Because saving trees affects the lives of the existing and living people! Who cares about those unborn lives when even our own lives are at risk..
2006-07-27 02:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by Forest_aude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is such a broad generalization. Why on earth would you even ask this question? Just because people want to save trees doesn't mean they don't want to save ALL children (NOT just the unborn). Your agenda is showing....
2006-07-27 02:06:19 · answer #3 · answered by clarity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is this another prolife abortion question. These two are different issues. Oh by the way we need trees to sustain us and many other organisms. The human destruction of trees is hurting everything including ourselves on this planet. On other hand if you are talking about abortion, both sides have strong viable arguments. As for trees, it is more clear cut. The people who want to cut down trees care only about money and ignores everything else.
2006-07-27 02:08:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well someone has to look after saving our trees. That's where most of the worlds oxygen supply comes from. Not to say that children arn't important also, some one has to look after them as well.
2006-07-27 02:19:18 · answer #5 · answered by soulvendor2002 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it really is uncomplicated : timber produce oxygen and are a organic source it really is not any longer actual re-plenished . little ones are being born everyday and they are the reason of overpopulation . the better little ones that there are the a lot less foodstuff there is going to be . better human beings ought to apply birth control , and practice secure sex to reduce the variety of undesirable little ones . what's going to human beings eat at the same time as there is not any better room to advance foodstuff , one yet another . remember " Soylent eco-friendly is human beings " .
2016-11-26 02:29:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why I have I heard this stupid question a million times from other right-winger nutjobs?
Listen, you will never stop abortion. I would never have an abortion but women used to die from illegal abortions (or they'd do it themselves) I'd rather abortion be legal and safe, if they're going to do it anyway.
2006-07-27 02:07:57 · answer #7 · answered by spike_is_my_evil_vampire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, if we don't have an enviroment we will cease to exist.
2006-07-27 02:06:59 · answer #8 · answered by catlike curiosity 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a ridiculous question.
The end.
2006-07-27 02:04:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋