English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In an economy where a unit of labour can produce either 1 unit of x or 4 units of y (or any linear combination of the two) and a unit of capital can produce either 4 units of x or 1 unit of y (or any linear combination of the two). There are 100 units of each means of production. Suppose now that the discovery of new production technologies allows the production of both x and y by using only one of the two means of production (without a change in their respective productivity).

1) what will be the production possibility curve?

2) What will be the opportunity cost of producing 50 units of x?

2006-07-27 01:41:43 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

4 answers

Yeah, ditto. This should be easy to solve, anyway. If you don't see an approach, try a graphical analysis.

2006-07-27 02:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by Veritatum17 6 · 0 0

a million. He could take an Econ a hundred and one path so he would not sound like such an ignorant fool each and each time he talks approximately something "financial". 2. He could examine a history e book or 3 to comprehend whey socialist and communist regimes have not worked EVER. 3. He could get advisors who've surely run some thing massive and complex and have SUCCEEDED (Mitt Romney could be a clever determination). 4. He could cut back TAXES instead of talking approximately elevating THEM (returned, that's the place that very uncomplicated economics type could quite help him look much less silly). 5. He could stop talking approximately nationalizing companies, regulating pay at inner maximum companies, having government take over wellness care, increasing regulation on companies, introducing a cap and commerce device, fee controls for specific companies. those issues all have unfavourable macroeconomic effects and that they are undesirable, very undesirable (returned, a uncomplicated economics type could help). the subject that's that once Obama took workplace, this wasn't the worst financial disaster in history - - no longer even close. What he has completed on account that taking workplace has rather contributed to a lots shakier inventory industry, lots decrease client self assurance and a real disintegration of our financial device. He has completed extra harm in 40 5 days than I ever imagined he ought to. he's an unmitigated disaster so far and that i'm very in contact approximately the place our united states is now headed. enable's help mitigate his process destruction via electing authentic financial conservatives in 2010 so as that the U. S. Congress can help block the crap Obama is offering or has already put in action.

2016-11-03 02:40:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The KEY here is to understand there you have 1 of 2 possibilities:

1) The PPC curve can shift inward or outward, or
2) You can move to a different position on the curve.

How do you tell which one it will be? Look at the factors that effect the curve, and that will tell you.

For example, with a demand curve, if more consumers enter the market, the demand curve would shift outward and to the right.

2006-07-30 00:35:02 · answer #3 · answered by msoexpert 6 · 0 0

We will not do your homework for you here on Yahoo Answers.

Stay after school or get tutored for extra help!

2006-07-27 01:45:57 · answer #4 · answered by crazyotto65 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers