English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Following a question on Yahoo answers,
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ao6NMgnFMYQPwfSTnCtVO.AgBgx.?qid=20060726053440AATELpT

Now read this and please come back and comment....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060727/cm_csm/ynorton27;_ylt=ArSOj.2xYEY9VIbkzHabuDis0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--

2006-07-27 01:37:28 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Thank you dude, I have always said the best way to educate simple minds is through analogy. Thank you

2006-07-27 01:55:07 · update #1

21 answers

Following up on some guy's stupid answer... Lebanon did not cultivate terrorists on their soil. Syria and Iran provided funds and weapons to a militia that is stronger than the Lebanese military. If Lebanon would go to war against Hezbollah, the country would be thrown into civil war that Hezbollah would win, thus giving Lebanon to Syria. Didn't you pay attention to Lebanon's previous civil war? Simple answers from simple minds.

Imagine Russia implanting a powerful militia in Mexico. And this militia would outnumber the Mexican military and be better equipped. This militia then starts attacking US from Mexico. Is this Mexico's fault that they are too poor to fight this militia. This is what is happening in Lebanon.

2006-07-27 01:51:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10 2

did any war succeed since ww2
have we any better results to offer then korea,vietnam or any occupation war.
DESERT storm had Iraq retreat from burning down the oil fields on it's border that had performed slant drilling and where stealing Iraq oil.ONCE the UNITED STATES became involved they did not fight but simply retreated back to IRAQ.
WAR today is never going to have the same effect it did in the recent past .
people make up there own minds around the world and do not listen to the government who can order people to stop any and all attacks and turn over those who do not disarm and nothing happens.
You may want to ask why at this point .WHY do we fail at accomplishing the goal of peace full co-existance when it seems so close .
RELIGION is the reason .
YOU can not fight a religion or its followers .
Today all the little wars around the world are about just that .
IF you do not see things my way then you will be killed .THIS is why all attempts at a negotiated truce and peace-full co-habitation is impossble .
IF you took GOD out of the equation then maybe peace could slowly replace war and violence as long as people are treated equally under economy that follows.

2006-07-27 01:52:30 · answer #2 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0 0

We thought that US secretary of state Ms. Condoleezza Rice's visit in Middle East in recent days would lead to immediate cease-fire in the present war in Lebanon; instead, she stoked the fire.

I am sure had the late PM of Israel (Yitzhak Rabin assassinated on 4th November 1995, at the end of a rally in support of the Oslo agreements in Tel Aviv by his fellow countryman for trying to have win-win situation in negotiation) been alive today, the situation in terms of Arab-Israeli relationship would have been much better than where it has already landed, if not very peaceful.

It is not that the Palestinian leadership can absolve themselves from the blames of this failure too. They lost so many golden opportunities for peace in the last decade and Mr. Yaseer Arafat sometimes led them wrongly.

Today the Lebanese people are suffering for the follies of both the sides as well as the USA. By the way, Prez Bush has made almost all the policy planning of his presidency look like failures and blunders.

2006-07-27 01:58:32 · answer #3 · answered by Hafiz 7 · 0 0

Yes. How can they claim to promote the "sanctity of life" while innocent people die with their blessings?

Israel has said it will flatten any village from which a missile is fired. This is akin to the collective punishment used by the Nazi Germany. The führer issued a September 1941 order to use "the harshest measures" against civilians in areas where the Resistance was active, arguing that "only the [collective] death penalty can be a real means of deterrence."

They have become that which they despised...

2006-07-27 02:22:35 · answer #4 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0 0

Iraq is extremely sturdy at this factor, i have not lost any civil rights (and neither have you ever), human beings nevertheless flock to the stay contained in the U. S., and the so-referred to as economic disaster is a economic disaster, no longer an economic one and is not any longer the fault of the Bush administration any extra or less than it is the Clinton administration's. a number of those issues pass decrease back to legislations of the ninety's and it is principally the "fault" of the organization community.

2016-10-15 06:28:20 · answer #5 · answered by machey 4 · 0 0

To know one is incompetent is gracious but to agree to something at the expense of others is i would say sinister. The **** sticks called Israel has been stirring trouble since they sought the pity of the world because Hitler was going around gathering them to be killed. Now that they have stolen the land with the help of the hypocrites, they have grown horns and follow the example of Hitler by doing exactly that? What is wrong with the world, don't they have any dignity as human beings?What is wrong if Muslims prays in ropes, at least we don't go to the church once a week and behave like the devil the rest of the week.Mr. i don't know. you might know more if you go study some spelling.

2006-07-27 02:21:46 · answer #6 · answered by D greendesk 3 · 0 0

You are pointing in the wrong direction fella. Israel is surrounded by people who are sworn to kill every Jew on the face of the earth a fact that whichever way you wanna package it is a statement of fact. The fact that the Bush administration/American people support Israel only gets the attention that it does because left wing extremists have to find a way of justifying their beliefs and Bush in his bumbling way falls foul of them time after time
BUT
It still does not justify Jew bashing by trendy lefties supping Lattes "sharing" the grief of the Palestinian people. The bottom line is that in the region Israel is a beacon of civilisation and Christianity that the Arabs/Islamists literally cannot abide and have sworn to kill them. I for one hope that Israel step up the military action and frighten the terrorists into submission that will calm the region down until some other fanatical Islamic extremist group rise to the for to "kill the infidels"
Of course its tragic - death always is but next time some lunatic fundamentalist thinks about kidnap he may reconsider

2006-07-27 02:12:26 · answer #7 · answered by heath 3 · 0 0

Another disgruntled islamic terrorist or another lost mind infected with the disease called liberalism.
Bush does not call the shots in Lebanon.
Iran and Syria do.
Thank god there is a Bush to protect the world from terrorists because if it were up to the liberal moonbats, we'd all be wearing robes and praying in mosques by now.

2006-07-27 02:07:32 · answer #8 · answered by Munster 4 · 0 0

So you are blaming Bush and Israel for terrorist bombers?

No matter what we are doing, aren't they terrorists either way for ACCEPTING suicide bombing as an acceptable means of attack?
On top of that, Israel wouldn't be attacking had no terrorists existed attacking them in the first place. This is like the chicken and the egg question, except we know that the egg came first, and now the chicken's getting blamed.

2006-07-27 01:41:53 · answer #9 · answered by AprilRocksIt 3 · 0 0

Lebanon must pay for cultivating terrorists in its backyard. Hezbollah started a war but Israel will finish it. Bleeding Heart liberal Democrats would say we made the wrong choice no matter what we did. If we help them we are wrong, if we help lebanon we are wrong, if we do nothing we are wrong. Mabey this is the wrong country for you to be living in. Mabey Africa would be more to your liking?

2006-07-27 01:43:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers