English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i heard lebanon is a member

2006-07-27 00:48:37 · 11 answers · asked by thinktank 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

not only arab league,UN also doing very little.

2006-07-27 01:29:32 · answer #1 · answered by nice guy 5 · 1 0

the arab goverments afraid from america and the arab crowd are not allowed to help lebanon if arab crowds can do what they want without a goverment's authority they will destroy israel.

2006-07-27 00:56:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the lebanese christians hated the muslims because the civil conflict in lebanon , and fath al islam turned right into a terrorist team and IT became extremely blended between LEBANESE men AND PALESTINIAN men they were terrorists , notwithstanding the finished sin that the lebanese arny did became hostile to the innocents , the arab governments became encouraging them to annihilate the terrorists regardless of the reality that if it meant to kill innocents . nicely it is what i imagine.

2016-10-15 10:03:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Arab league is a dead organization of dead souls, amirs, sheikhs, princess with hundreds of concubines and equal number of bastards who love their wealth and adore the ignorance of their people and the so called 'religiously' righteous ones who have screwed the entire Islamic cause in the process of their greed and personal autocracy. That was the anger part:).

Arab League consists of countries with lots of wealth, Saudi Arabia, ruled since early 1900's by the house of Faysal since it broke up from the Islamic identity of Turskish Caliphate through the 'kind' acts by the British (seen? the movie lawrence of Arabia), UAE (actually an amalgam of seven tiny states, all oil rich) ruled by the clan of Alnahayan, Kuwait (even tiny country ruled since it was founded by British in 1950's by one clan, the Sabahs), Qatar (solely ruled by a king since it was founded in 1950s), Bahrain (another rotten monarchy), Oman (the Qaboos family bastion of luxury), and less rich countries like Djibouti, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Somalia, Yemen, Algeria. There are few others who can't do anything about anything as the poverty has never let them prosper out of the dark ages. Dark ages have lingered in the minds of the the rulers, (kings and their proteges, Sheiykhs, Khadimain-e-haramein-e-sharifeyn "the custodian-servants-of-holy-shrines (of Islam)" who have now ruled for more than a century and yet not once attempted to introduce any intellectual movements in their countries. Major oil producing arab states like saudi arab, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar. Oman have spent all the petro dollars earned on the construction of luxury villas and imported furniture and automobiles from the Western hemispheres. They did opened a few universities in their countries but never agreed to give their people any share in the matters of the state. Thus obliterating all channels of democratic thinking and pushing their people in the only avenue open with lots of wealth, i.e, happiness in gambling, prostitution, liquour, concubines and illegitimate children in hundreds. They have somehow managed to keep their status as the guardians of faith throughout the Islamic states as the holy cities of Mecca and Medina are situated there. They portray the general lethargy and insensitivity prevalant in most of the Islamic countries. Although they should be termed as "Muslim" territories as there is nothing wrong with the belief system itself. Their adehrence to centuries old code of so called 'honor' and caste/clan preferences are the basic things Islam was founded against, but the clergy in post-caliphate Turkey took sides with the ruling elite and thus started what we know as the dark decay of the Muslim society which saw its glory in Spain through corridors of history but ended eventually in 1492 A. D.
Palestine and Lebanon are both members of this organization which has neither the will or the power to do anything against status quo. They will not awaken from their slumber as there is no collective will left in either the rulers or the ruled which is so common in modern day life. Education, awareness, civil rights are only allowed within the frame work of a strict colonial / clan based society and they can not resists Israeli terror and blatant lies who kill innocent civilians, babies, women and still gets along with its Western allies on its side as the 'defence forces' which are being attacked by the 'cruel' 12 years old gangs of Muslims. Had it been a democratic (incidentally the late Iraq was also part of Arab league) and its rulers have forsaken their bodily luxuries for the intellectual development of their masses and rose to meet tthe challenge of new era few hundred years ago, it would have been impossible for any terrorist state to conquer or look at Lebanon. But as of now Israeli forces have captures few more towns inside a soverign state (Lebanon) and Ms. Rice is saying that 'we will wait for a sustainbale solution' aka till Lebanese people are wiped out and Israel gets another medal of 'honor' annexed in coming days.

2006-07-27 01:27:13 · answer #4 · answered by qualittee 3 · 0 0

they do not want to touch the issue.

They know the world will not tolerate them jumping up and down on Israel, and they also know it will only serve to make the situation worse.

They are smart enough to shut up and not say a word.

2006-07-27 00:56:08 · answer #5 · answered by holdon 4 · 0 0

coz..they are afraid....israel defeated them once.........
also some world pressure..........and most of arab countries are ruled by dictators and monrchies.................they dont wanna loose their power........so the fact is arab leadership is "coward".......the one that could do something "saDDAM HUSSEIN" HAS BEEN TAKEN OUT BY AMERICANS ALREADY......

LETS SEE WHAT Iran CAN DO...............COZ ARAB PPL WILL SUPPORT ACTION AGAINST ISRAEL..........WORLD WAR 3....(.IN WAITING)

2006-07-27 01:07:57 · answer #6 · answered by METICULOUS 3 · 0 0

Because they disagree with the current administration, and past administrations for that matter.

2006-07-27 00:51:09 · answer #7 · answered by Jim C 5 · 0 0

May be because, they fear the kicks they might get on their asses from the think tanks of Israel.

2006-07-27 00:54:07 · answer #8 · answered by Electric 7 · 0 0

they cant afford to show their support openly due to current international pressure.

2006-07-27 00:56:34 · answer #9 · answered by knu 4 · 0 0

They do, just not overtly

2006-07-27 00:52:48 · answer #10 · answered by uncle.bubba 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers