or is it all hollywood?
2006-07-26 23:43:42 · 17 answers · asked by muffin 2 in Travel ➔ Other - Destinations
I really don't think they would go through so much effort to fake so many landings. Sounds silly. I can see the propaganda point of the argument, but it just seems more far fetched to fake it that to have actually done it.
2006-07-27 15:26:41 · answer #1 · answered by spudric13 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Not everything is a conspiracy - Yes the US landed on the moon.
If it's fake - why fake it 5 more times? (Six manned moon landing in total - Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17) Wouldn't once be enough considering every time you 'faked it' would increase your chances of getting found out? As for why Hubble can't see lunar landing sites - Hubble is designed to view things like planets, universes, galaxies things millions/billions of miles away, millions/billions of miles across, not things that small and that close.
2006-07-27 03:36:41 · answer #2 · answered by Rockin' Mel S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 things,,read a book called 'nasa mooned america" and also in 2004 a japaneese satalite did the most detailed mapping of the moon ever....when it came out that there was no picture of either the flag or the moon buggy, the american government "asked" them not to reveal this or certain trade and arms deals may be at risk,,,,the pictures were never released ,,as the film was "not of a good enough quality"...japanese minister november 2005....oh and when people asked for hubble to take a picture of the flag,,,N.A.S.A. Said it isnt powerful enough to do this!!!!,,,,hang on this thing can see universes from millions of years ago but not something a few million miles away......go figure
2006-07-26 23:53:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hollywood, I reckon it was a propaganda thing as in "Ooh look what we can do, we're better than everyone else".
If it's true why can't a high powered telescope be used to show the flag they put up there? That would be the best conclusive evidence, they have the technology to do that so why don't they shut us up once and for all? Because they never went there.
2006-07-26 23:49:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they might have really made the effort and done it, and they could do far better now, but why they haven't really casts a shadow of doubt. How much would they have risked to beat the Russians? Everything.
Why do they not go back , I can't fathom. Maybe they want loads of controversy, but they also want to win others over. Probably didn't go.
If the Russians wouldn't let them get away with it, maybe at that time the Russians could not afford it, and in more recent times the Russian leaders have tried to destroy their communism, and have succeeded.
2006-07-26 23:55:15 · answer #5 · answered by Chris cc 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's all Hollywood ...
there are lots of things that indicate that they didn't land on the moon, for example : the shadows (there's no light on the moon that is enough to create shadows) and the movement of the flag (there's no pressure on the moon).
2006-07-26 23:49:01 · answer #6 · answered by >DraMa Qu33N< 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitely the Greenwich observatory do experiments with reflecting lasers which was set up by the moon landing teams. That is solid empirical data that actively proves a moon landing.
2006-07-26 23:56:31 · answer #7 · answered by break 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
During the moon landings Russia and the USA were in the "Space Race" do you think the Russians would have let them get away with faking it?...... I think not !!!
2006-07-26 23:51:27 · answer #8 · answered by BackMan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, they did land on the moon. Theres no way they could have faked it
2006-07-26 23:51:25 · answer #9 · answered by Toomg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amazing how some people will believe any crap. 37 years on and this is still going around. I suppose you think the world is flat as well?
2006-07-26 23:58:21 · answer #10 · answered by Gus M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋