HTML sites has limits to creating a site. Is it at least stable enough to create a static web site?

Answer 1

I do not understand your question. A static website by definition is a site with just HTML (and perhaps CSS styles as well as client-side scripting - e.g. Javascript).

Of course HTML is stable enough. In any case, it is a markup language that is up to the browsers (useragents) to parse. The HTML standard has been around since the early days of the web and has evolved into HTML 4.01 (with many new additions and deprecations) and even into XHTML today.

So yes, it is stable enough, and all browsers understand HTML the same way (ignoring minor discrepancies in proprietary tags such as or ). Of course it has to be stable; it's the foundation for every webpage in existance!

Answer 2

Of course, HTML is actually called Static Web Pages.
DHTML is Dynamic HTML that mean Dynamic Pages.
If you want data-driven pages, that's called Server-Side
Scripting.

Answer 3

Use static HTML pages (.html or .htm) for pages that don't change much. This is a lot more stable and won't throw scripting or database errors. Plus they load faster.

Answer 4

of cors no site in the web that doesnt starts with index.html -- no matter how powerful ur site maybe it still comes down to the very basic.


+
visit my sites:
http://www.drawbobo.com
http://www.spaceman.coms.ph

Answer 5

cmon man