Why get williams?
You have parker and Willis who are good enough!
look at tampas schedule! it is tough! If simms falters they will have to pass to catch up!
Plus alstott gets close goal line carries!
I would not trade moss or fitzgerald!
besides bridget is right just get Peyton LOL!
2006-07-26 20:08:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by happymrzot 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't really see moss doing anything this year. After all, aaron brooks isn't an upgrade from Kerry Collins, Kerry had a stronger arm for the deep ball. The ONLY addition is Michael Huff, and I don't really think Brooks can even throw the ball as far forward as he can backwards! (if you remember that play, yeah it'll be funny. If not then ignore it)
I don't see why ou really need to trade for Cadillac, you have solid RB's, and a decent QB in Favre, Decent TE, Two great WR's, you don't have any huge gaping weaknesses in your team, you're really actually quite solid for now, however you should trade vince to some sucker in your league who doesn't know he's just going to sit the first year, and can't even understand the playbook. Billy Volek WILL get the job, and he WILL start all 16 games barring an injury. You don't really need cadillac, and the only thing you should be trading for is a QB IF you start 2 QB's. If only one, drop vince, pick up somebody else, and you'll be fine except for bye week, which is only one week.
Also, I can GUARUNTEE favre does not go wild, he lost his key WR in Javon Walker, and age is still just catching up to him. Look how great he did last year with his career record for interceptions! He's falling behind, and while still a lower-middle class QB, he's really not doing anything more than just what he did last year. The odds are not in his favor. While he has his RB's back, he had Samkon Gado last year doing wonderful things for him, so RB's relaly don't affect him that much. He's falling, and he can't get up.
2006-07-27 06:26:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by buzzerbeater7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
See if they will take Lewis or Willie Parker for him.
McGahee is the certain starter of the three. Lewis could possibly lose the starting role to Mike Anderson. I'm not hot on Parker for a fantasy back because last year Willie got the yards and Bettis got the scores. This year it will be Deuce or Verron getting the goal line carries. Plus Cowher will sometimes on a gut feel put Parker on the bench in favor of a bigger back for a game.
2006-07-27 04:24:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by TeeDawg 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trade Vince Young, he won't play much this season, if they will accept him. Otherwise Willis Mcgahee for Williams is a good trade, the Bills are not going to be good this year and may not be running the ball much past the first quarter, whereas Tampa will be running the clock in the fourth quarter. You can't give up on Jamal Lewis yet, last season he was hurt, and has bounced back huge the last 2 times he was injured. Look for him to explode this season. Favre has a healthy team around him, look for him to go wild as well. Moss and Fitzgerald are an excellent tag team of receivers, under no circumstances trade either one. Look for Moss to have big numbers this year with Aaron Brooks throwing the ball, and the old Raidr offense back, throw it deep, and who is better at catching that pass if healthy? Nobody, I have Moss and T.O. on my team(lucky me!), because nobody wanted either one, yet I will be laughing when I win the league yet again.
2006-07-27 03:16:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by BigPapi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
See if you can package a deal with either Moss or Fitzgerald and Jamal Lewis for Cadillac and another stud WR. This way, you're getting Cadillac and you get another stud WR and you don't lose anything. Other than that, you could trade McGahee for Cadillac straight up
2006-07-26 18:11:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michael_D_Miller 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
either way ur going to have to give up a stud to get him,a good RB is like a closer in baseball,they sell very high, i would never give up a guy like carnell unless i was getting a stud at another position if someone came to me and wanted carnell i wouldnt give him up unless i had a guy like barber or portis starting,unless this guy has a really good starter at RB and carnell was his backup i dont see u getting him without giving up another stud on ur team and it isnt worth it,carnell wont get alot of TDs because of alstott at FB handilying goaline stuff so moss or fitzgerald would be more valuble in that aspect in yards a RB is always better than a reciever thats why with ur first pick u have to get a RB because WRs are to ranged with yards remember how steve smith destroyed the bears in the playoffs?well the next game he played against the sea hawks he did nothing WRs are to big of a risk always go with a good RB i see u went with a top wide out with ur top pick bad choice running backs are more productive so that probably mest ur whole draft up try fitzgerald for carnell fitzgerald will have a down year because of anquan boldin so it would be a steal for u if u can just get carnell straight up for fitzgerald
2006-07-27 14:45:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ... 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think your backs are ok. McGahee is a ?. Jamal should be back and Willie Parker should be ok, but needs to get some TD's.
Unless the person that has Caddy is a moron, I would think you would at least have to give up Moss to get him.
2006-07-27 01:38:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by gotearz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say you trade Randy Moss for Cadillac Williams.
Moss is an overrated fantasy player, and was a complete bust last year. I see no reason for things to change. Get rid of him while you can.
2006-07-27 02:24:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by ~O.N.E.~ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jamal Lewis and Brett Favre may have their names and nothing else. If you can package those two together for Cadillac, I think you'll have a good trade.
2006-07-27 03:03:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ammy2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in spite of the actual undeniable fact that Tory Holt is poor this 300 and sixty 5 days because of fact of a bad Offensive Line and QB themes, and you'd be getting T.O., Peterson is the wonderful RB interior the league and Kevin Smith is on the factor of a 2d string RB (Rudi Johnson would desire to be beginning over him). do no longer do the commerce. =P
2016-12-10 16:25:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋