Nostradamas was considered right a lot, but I always thought he was rather vague. The only thing he got nearly exactly right was his naming of Hitler (he called him Histler, close- very close, but not exact). Nearly all of his other stuff was so vague that it doesn't really amount to anything.
2006-07-26 17:47:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bernard B 3
·
19⤊
3⤋
Yes, he is always right. That is proven by his prediction of the massive Earthquake in 1987 which created a shift in the San Andreas fault which caused most of the coastal cities to fall into the Pacific Ocean. Oh, wait, that one didn't come true. Hey, most of these didn't happen.
Well, I guess not.
2006-07-27 00:57:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jim T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think that he is always right. I read that book in 1998 whatever was predicted for 2000 was flase.
2006-07-27 00:44:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nikhil G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that only about half of his predictions came true. It's all very interesting though.
2006-07-27 00:56:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Marilyn Monroe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya... I saw that too... and when it happens another way, they say people either misinterpreted him or something like that... Its people that make it sound true..(remember the one about end of the world.... then it didnt happen... now they changed the date etc... what CRAP!!!
2006-07-27 00:44:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sheila 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no he isn't always right........and yes he did predict somethings but a lot of what he said wasn't credible
2006-07-27 00:42:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by ca_license_pl8t 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
not by a mile. there is nothing scientific backing up his predictions. it is our way of interpreting all his "dreams."
2006-07-27 00:44:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. no one can see the future. except me.
2006-07-27 00:42:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by darpdarp 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. just coincidence. the quatrains are just poetry.
2006-07-27 00:48:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by >(",)< 2
·
0⤊
0⤋