English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

girls think its weird, but they get used to it. I guess

2006-07-26 17:41:13 · answer #1 · answered by gaijin 2 · 0 0

It used to be started in the us and medicalized to curtail male masturbation and sexual urges, the Drs didn't have a clue about the worth of what they were reducing off. It used to be not puzzled. Within the UK and Aus, a number of Drs puzzled it and it was once halted as a horrible removing of healthy erogenous tissue. Lots of the world does not do it and the rate is dropping in the USA. The foreskin isn't just skin and does not just safeguard the glans(head). Circumcision is now recognized to ablate the most sensitive elements of the male genitals. This surgery takes away the principal male pleasure zones with about 20000 high-quality contact and stretch nerve endings amputated. The foreskin has several parts including the ridged band that is exceptional for ones pleasure (this is the reason nutters like Kellogg wanted to chop em off, to curtail masturbation), Masturbation is principal for a mans physical and mental wellbeing. The ridged band instantly contacts the vagina for extraordinarily exceptional pleasure all around. The dynamics of sex and the precise mechanism of the penis are drastically modified with the aid of circumcision. The foreskin can probably be slipped all of the method, or virtually all of the approach, back to the bottom of the penis, and in addition slipped forward beyond the glans. This vast range of motion is the mechanism in which the penis and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are motivated the only contact organ possessing as wealthy erogenous innervation as the foreskin is the clitoris. Circumcision deprives man of 2/3ds of the primary erogenous zone constituted of the foreskin and the glans. The united states is also saved by way of the web. Individuals did not speak about this. With the net people are figuring out they are harming their kid.

2016-08-09 05:04:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, my first partner was uncircumcised and every guy since then has been circumcised.

Could say the first guy was better because of skill or because there was serious affection there, but I think I can pretty honestly say that I preferred the feel of uncircumcised.

2006-07-26 17:40:58 · answer #3 · answered by Calindi15 2 · 2 0

good, my first companion exchange into as quickly as uncircumcised and each and each guy because of the reality that then has been circumcised. could say the 1st guy exchange into extra proper on condition that of skills or because of the reality that there exchange into as quickly as severe affection there, yet I evaluate i will extraordinarily surely say that I conventional the feel of uncircumcised.

2016-11-03 02:19:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LOL I use to know a Derek that wasn't circumcised...do you live FL?

Nonetheless....other than you have to push back the skin no there's no difference in feeling. A penis is a penis.

2006-07-26 17:42:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no,i havent had any uncircumcised partners ever.some of my friends though had and they said its a bit awkward 'inside' coz they can feel a lot of loose skins rubbing against their 'wall'.

2006-07-26 17:44:12 · answer #6 · answered by summer79 5 · 0 0

I wouldn't know....I have never had a partner that was uncircumcised.

2006-07-26 17:45:40 · answer #7 · answered by 2hot2handle 3 · 0 0

It matters not. What is imperative is the endowedment of the biaviian member. We impregnate other species through telepathic means of exasperation.

2006-07-26 17:43:05 · answer #8 · answered by dragonman343 3 · 0 0

Can you tell the difference between a turtle and a snake? I think so!!

2006-07-26 17:41:16 · answer #9 · answered by Nymph 4 · 0 0

apparantly we r supposed 2 b able 2 but i could never feel any diff. its all the same 2 me.

2006-07-26 17:41:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes,but later.Partners of circumcised men absolutely do not get cervical cancer.

2006-07-26 17:42:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers