2006-07-26 17:17:31 · 12 answers · asked by Rajesh Arja 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
big bang is a very unrealistic theory.. your question is one reason why.. because it can't be answered. personally I think that the Universe has always been here and never had a beginning. this sounds confusing but its only because our brains cannot comprehend something not having a beginning or an end.. because anything we have ever known other than the universe it self has had some kind of beginning and some kinds of end whether or not it was in our life time. that is why we assume there was a beginning in the first place. but don't think about your question too hard or the start of the Universe because even if there was a start we will never find out about it.
2006-07-26 20:38:32 · answer #1 · answered by The Answerer 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in the form of a physical formula ?
You see, every schoolboy knows that is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition by the formula T=0K.
2006-07-27 06:07:10 · answer #2 · answered by socratus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Imagine going out to the edge of the universe today, just past the furthest galaxy. Look beyond. You'll see the same stuff.
And sheesh, doesn't handicapper know that the big bang was started by the Wizard of Oz?
2006-07-27 00:20:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing. The big bang was not just the beginning of matter and energy, but the beginning of time and space itself. There was nothing surrounding our universe when it was a point because that would mean that our universe was just a point inside a larger space. It's not easy to visualize, but there was no space when our universe was a point. The big bang was not an explosion *into* space, it was an explosion *OF* space.
2006-07-27 00:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They think now that not one but several big bangs have occurred in our universe.Imagine two huge membranes(moving bubbles)close to one another.Every now and then,these universes touch,sending matter in one direction,anti matter in another.We are in the matter part of the blast...tom science
2006-07-27 00:24:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
anything outside of our universe is (by definition) not within our realm of knowing.
we cannot consider other parallel universes, nor can we consider anything outside the boundary of our universe, since any existing quantities are not measurable.
but keep thinking...you and 6 billion others would love to know the answer!!
2006-07-27 00:22:22 · answer #6 · answered by powhound 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
void
nothing thats why it's the big bang
a perfect vacume
nothing not even space
you still don't understand do you?
there wasn't time space or dimintion yet all started with the big bang.
2006-07-27 00:25:02 · answer #7 · answered by Chris J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly the Borg homeworld?
2006-07-27 06:41:18 · answer #8 · answered by mike j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing. It was just a point surrounded by nothing.
2006-07-27 00:21:10 · answer #9 · answered by EE 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not know.
What started the big bang?
2006-07-27 00:20:20 · answer #10 · answered by nflhandicapper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋