Facts about WMD and Bush ?

Question

NOW YOU SHOULD KNOW HE DID NOT LIE.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=20&artnum=2&issue=20060725

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/elder052506.asp

NOW 50% AMERICAN BELIEVE SADDAM HAD WMD.

ALMOST ALL DEMO. LEADERS BELIEVED IN IRAQ'S WMD.

BUT .. MAYBE IT'S NOT ENOUGH TO CONVINCE BLIND LIBERALS.

Answer 1

umm, sorry, but bush lied, no new weapons were found, they were all decayed weapons from the gulf war era and before, that conflict was settled and the weapons were put to rest, useless, done.
read the articles yourself, and dont listen to jewish world review for middle eastern affairs, try al jazeera to be fair for once

Answer 2

So the Internet doesn't have anyone who lies on here. Really? Get a clue dude. Wilson was sent over there BY bUSH & he stated there were NO WMD'S there. What happened? They "outed" his wife who worked for the CIA. Then YOU NEO-CONS tried to blame it on her or belittle her by stating she wasn't an active CIA agent, she was just a secretary. HE LIED. If you want to believe him, that's on you, but others know the truth. That's why bush is still around 37% on approval ratings, and that came from the conservative news networks.

Answer 3

OMG try Al Jazeera to be fair for once. that's got to be the funniest quote I've seen all day.
I wonder how many liberals can tell you exactly what happened in Mogadishu, or in Serbia. Or why Clinton was bombing Afghanistan in 2000. Or could it be they accepted it as necessary because the Clinton White House said so?
Janet Reno orders the killing of hundreds of people in Waco Texas, and then she denies it, and not one liberal howls for an investigation. The Clinton White House lies to the family of Elian Gonzalez, raides their home one morning out of the blue, and then denies it was a raid.
But no, to hear them tell it, the same old cliche "Bush lied people died"

Answer 4

Okay this has been said a million times but folks like you like to hold on to this story as proof that Bush did'nt lie. The 500 shells of mustard gas were all from before 1992 and they were so old they did'nt even work. There was a couple of shells of sarin that still worked though. The guy Charles Duelfer who you have quoted in one of those sites, wrote a report called the "Duelfer Report" which states these are not the weapons we are looking for, and they do not indicate a reconstituted weapons program, this is from one of the people you cited as proof in the top site. I doubt you or people like you even bothered to read the report, I did because someone like yourself was bringing up this same crap. If you think I am lying go ahead and read it yourself it is called the "Duelfer Report". If people like yourself really think we started the war over 500 shells of 12 year old mustard gas that did'nt even work, than you are not the smartst person in the world. If you really think they were moved to Syria, it astonishes me that this is okay with people like yourself because this is a whole lot worse than if they were in Iraq, Syria now and always has had way more significant ties to terrorism than Iraq, if the massive stockpiles of, smallpox, anthrax, VX, sarin and others were moved to Syria, that just opens up an even worse fukup than if the weapons did'nt exist, I and most people would way rather these weapons not exist rather than being in another way worse terrorist nation than Iraq, but folks like you who believe this think it is A-OK, that does not maqke sense. Hell, maybe Bush did'nt lie totally, I think he knew there were weapons in the country, but that is not the reason why we went to war, it was just an excuse, it may be to put our troops into a strategic position in that area, either way to people like me, it was not the best decision at the time, we had way more dangerous enemies in the area, with way more dangerous weapons, and way higher priorites, most military people will tell you this, after 9-11 Iraq was not the best decision. If you really think there were WMD's in Iraq when we invaded, find out where they are, if you think they are in Syria, ask yourself why that is okay by people like you. We went to war to get the WMD's from Iraq, and people like you say since we did'nt find them in Iraq, they are now in Syria, and that is okay to people like you for some reason, from a dictator with a few ties to Islamic jihadists to a country with terrorist havens and terror supporters everywhere, it is okay to people like you that these weapons are there instead of in American hands like they are supposed to be, that just makes me see how full of shitt people like you are, grow up and open yer eyes goddam it. Oh and another thing, if these weapons justify the reason for our invasion, why don't we hear about it on every media outlet there is, oh yeah you people like to make believe there is a massive media conspiracy out there against you because none of the stuff you hear on the news ever seems to make the Bush administration look good, so why don't the actual Republicans talk about it more, maybe they are in on it too. You people are for the most part kooks and really don't ever ask for prrof when some one tells you something you agree with, it is really sad, maybe some day you will get yer collective heads out of yer collective asses and actually try to do our great nation some good because right now folks, despite all yer make believe, we are in troulble so wake the *** up you peabrained no balls havin shithead we got work to do.

Answer 5

Yep.... I never lost faith in the man.

But the libs will spin this and the left wing media won't report the truth.

Answer 6

We are never going to get through to people that just don't want to know the truth.
Face it, it gives them something to complain about....
Thanks for trying!

Answer 7

He is really religious, prays alot, and hates atheists.

Answer 8

PREACH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And sorry TAD......... Al Jazeera is only good for broadcasting terrorist propaganda.

Answer 9

more right wing propaganda.