Most people go to war thinking to bring peace.
2006-08-03 16:21:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by nursesr4evr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here are a few that I can think of off-hand:
1. Maudlin women that get on Oprah and cry over a sentimental story but then go home and neglect their kids, sleep around on their husbands, starve their animals, play cat games at the office and on and on.
2. SUV drivers with bumper stickers that support the war in Iraq.
3. Obese women that act like they are more moral because they wear conservative clothes and shoes
4. Obese people that drive SUVs that couldn't fit into any kind of chemical gear and that support the war in Iraq
5. People that drive gas guzzlers complaining about the cost of fuel, when people all over the rest of the world are made to drive reasonable vehicles.
6. Spoiled kids that go to expensive colleges, drive expensive cars and then act like they are more moral than the rest of the world.
7. Jerks that are blowing up schools in Afghanistan, ostensibly for religion, but really to advance their own materialistic agenda.
8. Women (let's be PC) that have tons of kids, so they can't afford much, but then get angry when they see people who have taken a more conservative approach to life and then resort to sneering at them in the street as if they are spoiled white rich witches.
9. Women who go all out to avoid sitting on a toilet seat to avoid germs, but then don't clean their mess up when they ultimately miss and then leave the bathroom without even washing their hands.
10. Capitalistic caregivers (doctors)
11. American health insurance is a contradiction in terms
12. Public servants - yeah whatever.
2006-07-26 17:24:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by LifeMatrix2012 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think most people will serve themselves before others. Not enough people are kind in the world. We are here for a short time, why are we trashing the place so fast? No one bothers to learn they just assume. We are following leaders that at best are just guessing what might happen next. No one has any clue what will happen each day yet we all seem to get out of bed in a hurry so that we aren't late for work. People are all addicted to one very powerful drug and that is life. We will sometimes kill to keep our addictions going but at the same time we destroy someone elses addiction.
I'm sure you can get five seconds out of that heap.
2006-07-26 16:26:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by cancerman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without a doubt, political correctness and liberalism.
Being liberal and politically correct in this day and age is the irony of all ironies. Liberals make laws and rules that are so general that they are one size fits all. Unfortunately, one size never fits all and they are so general and full of loopholes that they actually cover no one.
Political correctness is the same. We have become so paranoid of being different from one another that we have come up with a way to make everyone fit into the same mould. In doing so, we have lost our individuality and our ability to stand up and say something potentially life altering because of offending one person in a crowd of 5000 and suffering possible litigation.
2006-08-03 13:52:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by billydeer_2000 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
excellent: thought provoking and challenging. how about the "one complete idea" being the successful struggle for individuality and "transcendence" in the face of repression and ever increasing societal movement toward mediocrity and conformity. it's really quite archetypal, after all, and thus would automatically resonate with the viewers. you could have a number of vignettes showing different expressions of the struggle, and then end it with an "archetypal" image of "wholeness/success" in the "quest". perhaps something mandalic, or the like. perhaps danced. i see the last scene as coming from a complete fade out before, and then from the blackness the final "image". perhaps in silence. maybe a little too dramatic, but it sounds kind of interesting.
2006-07-26 16:42:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by drakke1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with the religion answer. I'll use Christianity as an example. Christianity was based on the need for power, wealth, and absolute control. In order to have that absolute control, they lied about the conflicting religions. Call those who worshiped the Earth witches. Deemed their acts of praise as sadistic. Those who weren't turned to Christianity by fear of Hell, were tortured. Murdered in the name of God to save their souls. Then they turned around and said murder violates God's laws, and those who do it are condemned to hell. They are told to be more like Jesus. Yet are taught to hate anyone who defies convention. Those who are not straight edged God fearing people who live by 'the good book' are hell bound. Yet the vast majority are living the exact opposite, and pointing their fingers at those who choose not to hide behind the church. Distracting everyone and themselves from the hypocricy they live.
It's unorthodox, and may piss people off. But do some research about the beginning of Christianity, and the death of the female dominated society. I think it'd make for an interesting project.
2006-07-26 16:34:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by porcelainxdecay 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have sent men to the moon and back several times, but we can't invent whiteout for cake icing mistakes?
Evolution gains more and more confirming evidence every day (see evolution of finches in the last 20 years on Indonesian islands) right in front of our faces, and Yet the Kansas school board votes to include Intelligent Design in their science classes.
Many, many religions on the planet each claiming they are the one true religion.
Art is in the eye of the beholder. It is well accepted to say "I can't define art conclusively, but I can tell when I see it!" Hmmm... one man's art is another man's garbage. And one man's garbage is another man's treasure.
Most people tend to absent mindedly think that nature is wonderful and peaceful. Yet, (and there are tons of examples) male lions routinely kill all the small cubs in a pride that he has just taken over from the previously ruling lion. Chimpanzees have been documented clearly making war on neighboring "tribes" of other chimpanzees and killing each other. Many predators will, cruelly to us, play with their food, wounding it first so it can't get away and then chasing and recatching the prey animal over exended periods of time.
Our technology today comes from the application of science for so many things like cars, cell phones, computers, etc., and yet many of those same people that claim to be scientifically knowedgeable will routinely check out their horoscopes which have been clearly, scientifically debunked over and over again.
The Catholic church just recently apologized for having branded Galileo a heritic.
So many religions profess peace and tolerance of their fellow humans, and yet most of the blood spilled throughout history has been driven by religious beliefs in the name of religion.
Those responsible for 911 really, truly did believe they would be rewarded by god for what they did.
Most people would say that our universe is "local" in that something modified over "here" cannot possibly have an effect on something over "there" unless some information or affect travels over "there" to affect it. And Yet, physicists have demonstrated time and again that our universe is actually Non-local at the quantum level of everything: a photon measured over "here" can instantaneously affect a change in another photon many millions of miles away!
Whew! I could go on and on, but now I think I'm just wasting space. Good luck!!
2006-08-03 10:58:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by gdt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's a couple of thoughts...Does life imitate art, or does art imitate life? Or, why are people never satisfied? People always seem to want something that's out of reach, then when they get it, they find it's not what they wanted after all. What they want is what they originally had. Or what about something to do with the old saying "Youth is wasted on the young". Combining the wisdom of age with the enthusiasm and drive of the young.
2006-08-02 20:57:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by wondering 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
pricey Ex Muslim Atheist you have made some good factor's there, with regard to the ideals of a few religious human beings, yet you smash it via employing each and everything to all Christians, authentic that some human beings have some extraordinary fake ideals yet regrettably no longer all Atheists ideals are proper ideals the two, so quite the pointy is that regardless of you have faith or i've got faith till we make sure of all issues we've faith, they may well be far off from the reality then there'll be no fake desire for you nor for me it merely takes extremely artwork to locate issues out, yet of path you may could prefer to be attentive to the reality with regard to the ideals you would be able to hold or you will no longer seek for the reality of the concerns you carry ideals on, in case you had a medical subject you're able to do your superb could you to no longer basically remember to've the proper therapy for it, you does no longer make assumptions and make your min as much as have faith something wheather or no longer it exchange into good merely on account which you had to hold your opinion, could you? truthfully no longer, to your very existence could count on it, properly, your existence relies upon on understanding the reality approximately this very subject additionally so in effect maximum anybody is staking their lives on merely preserving directly to their comments as a result you have such multiple religions maximum of that are fake, for there is basically one reality merely like there is basically one thank you to handle an ailment(with the proper medicine, take the incorrect medicine and you ought to go through harm fairly than heal your self) you're good in that the communicate can g decrease backward and forward and volume to meaningless bickering, and that's a pointless exercising just to maintain your guy or woman opinion most of the time, truthfully a communicate can basically be good if the human beings preserving a communicate do no longer circulate into it with a closed concepts yet open their concepts, then they could learn from one yet another regrettably that does no longer usually take place for most of the Timethe discussions human beings have are with a closed concepts to their very own ideals, it quite is advantageous if that they had made specific that their ideals are proper. as a result you're incorrect interior the assertion that rreligiouspeople have unhappy and pathetic lives, even however some could have not all do, people who make sure of the reality do no longer, fairly they be attentive to what to assume and the thank you to stay an excellent happy existence the two for now and interior the destiny.
2016-11-03 02:13:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the past society was viewed more romantically than nowadays.
nowadays, society viewed as the collection of traditions, customs, etc. that "people" does, just because its what everybody does it. its all what we do without actually thinking about it, mechanically.
life is kind of the contrary than society, although it is implicit in the concept of life that its not always possible to do what you want (rules of society wont let you).
2006-07-26 16:31:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by OrtegaFollower 2
·
0⤊
0⤋