English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

a good one should

2006-07-26 15:44:30 · answer #1 · answered by bobhob222 4 · 0 0

I'd have to say that I don't necessarily think so. A good supervisor should know what is expected of each person in his or her charge, detect each employee's strengths and weaknesses to best use their talents, be alert and attentive to employee/client needs, and constantly learning. I don't think that a supervisor is a compilation of all job titles below "supervisor", if that were the case they would have to be paid much much more than most typically are.

2006-07-26 15:56:26 · answer #2 · answered by lazor_braids 2 · 0 0

You know, that sounds like it should be true, but, over the years, I've pretty much learned the less you know, the better are your chances of being made a supervisor. If I had a dollar for every time I showed a supervisor the easiest part of a job function and they reply, "...ohhhh, that's very interesting! Now, can you show me one more time how that's done???" Amazing. I always want to answer, "...sure, just as soon as you take my 35K job and I'll take your 85K."

2006-07-26 15:49:02 · answer #3 · answered by loveblue 5 · 0 0

Absolutely, a supervisor should be able to do each aspect of every job, so that if they need to step in to help, they can. It only makes them better at supervising, because they know the ins and outs of the whole facility that way.

2006-07-26 15:45:04 · answer #4 · answered by Muggle 3 · 0 0

Of course. A supervisor is overseeing the employee, they should not only be able to do that job but better and faster.

2006-07-26 15:44:47 · answer #5 · answered by fastcarceo25 3 · 0 0

No. A supervisor's job is to insure you do yours and successfully achieve the goals set for the business. They must know what it takes for you to do your job and provide you with the tools necessary.

2006-07-26 16:29:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would say yes.

There's a couple reasons why.

First off, the ability to do the job shows employees the right way things should be done.

Secondly, in a pinch, the super can actually do what needs be done if, say, half her staff is AWOL.

2006-07-26 15:46:37 · answer #7 · answered by kx_wx 3 · 0 0

although that would be the ideal, that's not always reality. but a supervisor should be able to help you get what you need to get your job done. that could mean equipment, or even directing you to where you can get an answer to your questions.

2006-07-26 15:46:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not all that is why there should be a mutual respect relationship. the supervisor respects your expertise in your part of the job they motivate you and konw about your job and you respect them as your superior. Unfortunately this does not happen a lot

2006-07-26 15:46:16 · answer #9 · answered by GutsiePerson 2 · 0 0

Not necessarily. The supervisor's job is getting the people under him/her to be as productive as possible, its not exactly the same job.

2006-07-26 15:46:18 · answer #10 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0 0

i exchange into fired f/ a dream interest after a a million month Probation (a million month in the past) with the aid of fact they mentioned i did no longer slot in ... no particular character conflicts. actuality exchange into, I by no ability slot in extra effectual for a job. I worked with the aid of lunches and breaks, did way extra suitable than my interest description and won a great variety of love f/ the clientele. i exchange into fired with the aid of a supervisor that exchange into purely there for a million/2 of my shifts. I discovered later that the buddy that counseled me for the situation stood to income a $2 hundred- finders bonus had I worked one extra day. a minimum of they're now contributing to my unemployment examine.

2016-10-08 08:56:18 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers